{"title":"1956年《性犯罪法》中对未成年人性交的起诉时限:一个持续的问题","authors":"J. Rogers","doi":"10.5040/9781509916801.ch-007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"committed when that Act was in force, ie, up until 30 April 2004. In relation to men who, before then, had (possibly) consensual sex with girls who were aged 13 or over, but under 16, there arises a serious problem. There was a time limit for commencing prosecutions of one year from the alleged commission of the offence under section 6 of the SOA 1956, which has been assumed to continue to apply. So it has long been impermissible to charge","PeriodicalId":324483,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Law Reform Now","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Time Limit on Prosecutions for Underage Sexual Intercourse in the Sexual Offences Act 1956: A Continuing Problem\",\"authors\":\"J. Rogers\",\"doi\":\"10.5040/9781509916801.ch-007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"committed when that Act was in force, ie, up until 30 April 2004. In relation to men who, before then, had (possibly) consensual sex with girls who were aged 13 or over, but under 16, there arises a serious problem. There was a time limit for commencing prosecutions of one year from the alleged commission of the offence under section 6 of the SOA 1956, which has been assumed to continue to apply. So it has long been impermissible to charge\",\"PeriodicalId\":324483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Criminal Law Reform Now\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Criminal Law Reform Now\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509916801.ch-007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminal Law Reform Now","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509916801.ch-007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Time Limit on Prosecutions for Underage Sexual Intercourse in the Sexual Offences Act 1956: A Continuing Problem
committed when that Act was in force, ie, up until 30 April 2004. In relation to men who, before then, had (possibly) consensual sex with girls who were aged 13 or over, but under 16, there arises a serious problem. There was a time limit for commencing prosecutions of one year from the alleged commission of the offence under section 6 of the SOA 1956, which has been assumed to continue to apply. So it has long been impermissible to charge
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
