突发公共卫生事件证券化:对塞拉利昂埃博拉疫情军事干预起源的定性考察

S. Boland, S. Mayhew, D. Balabanova
{"title":"突发公共卫生事件证券化:对塞拉利昂埃博拉疫情军事干预起源的定性考察","authors":"S. Boland, S. Mayhew, D. Balabanova","doi":"10.1136/bmjph-2023-000236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2013–2016 West Africa Ebola Epidemic remains the largest recorded Ebola outbreak. In response to the escalating number of cases in Sierra Leone in the summer and early autumn of 2014, the British Armed Forces and Republic of Sierra Leone Armed Forces intervened in support of the outbreak response. Among other contributions, the militaries established and subsequently helped to lead a national network of bespoke (and inherently militarised) coordination centres, from which almost all formal Ebola response operations were organised. Their contributions were therefore central to the outbreak response. However, the decision and process by which these actors first intervened is not well documented.In order to examine the historical origin of the militaries’ intervention, 110 semistructured qualitative interviews with key stakeholders at the international, national and subnational level were conducted and analysed.Military support to Sierra Leone’s Ebola response was found to result from the advocacy and careful planning of a small number of individuals operating in Freetown, alongside closed-door negotiations occurring at the highest level of government in the UK.This has important implications for understanding elite decision-making related to the militarisation of aid and the wider securitisation agenda.","PeriodicalId":101362,"journal":{"name":"BMJ public health","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Securitising public health emergencies: a qualitative examination of the origins of military intervention in Sierra Leone’s Ebola Epidemic\",\"authors\":\"S. Boland, S. Mayhew, D. Balabanova\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjph-2023-000236\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The 2013–2016 West Africa Ebola Epidemic remains the largest recorded Ebola outbreak. In response to the escalating number of cases in Sierra Leone in the summer and early autumn of 2014, the British Armed Forces and Republic of Sierra Leone Armed Forces intervened in support of the outbreak response. Among other contributions, the militaries established and subsequently helped to lead a national network of bespoke (and inherently militarised) coordination centres, from which almost all formal Ebola response operations were organised. Their contributions were therefore central to the outbreak response. However, the decision and process by which these actors first intervened is not well documented.In order to examine the historical origin of the militaries’ intervention, 110 semistructured qualitative interviews with key stakeholders at the international, national and subnational level were conducted and analysed.Military support to Sierra Leone’s Ebola response was found to result from the advocacy and careful planning of a small number of individuals operating in Freetown, alongside closed-door negotiations occurring at the highest level of government in the UK.This has important implications for understanding elite decision-making related to the militarisation of aid and the wider securitisation agenda.\",\"PeriodicalId\":101362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ public health\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2023-000236\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2023-000236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2013-2016年西非埃博拉疫情仍然是有记录以来规模最大的埃博拉疫情。为应对2014年夏季和初秋塞拉利昂不断上升的病例数,英国武装部队和塞拉利昂共和国武装部队进行了干预,支持疫情应对工作。在其他贡献中,军方建立并随后帮助领导了一个由定制的(本质上是军事化的)协调中心组成的国家网络,几乎所有正式的埃博拉应对行动都是由这些中心组织起来的。因此,他们的贡献对疫情应对至关重要。然而,这些参与者最初进行干预的决定和过程并没有得到很好的记录。为了研究军队干预的历史起源,对国际、国家和国家以下各级的主要利益相关者进行了110次半结构化定性访谈并进行了分析。调查发现,对塞拉利昂埃博拉应对行动的军事支持源于在弗里敦活动的少数个人的倡导和精心规划,以及英国政府最高层进行的闭门谈判。这对于理解与援助军事化和更广泛的证券化议程相关的精英决策具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Securitising public health emergencies: a qualitative examination of the origins of military intervention in Sierra Leone’s Ebola Epidemic
The 2013–2016 West Africa Ebola Epidemic remains the largest recorded Ebola outbreak. In response to the escalating number of cases in Sierra Leone in the summer and early autumn of 2014, the British Armed Forces and Republic of Sierra Leone Armed Forces intervened in support of the outbreak response. Among other contributions, the militaries established and subsequently helped to lead a national network of bespoke (and inherently militarised) coordination centres, from which almost all formal Ebola response operations were organised. Their contributions were therefore central to the outbreak response. However, the decision and process by which these actors first intervened is not well documented.In order to examine the historical origin of the militaries’ intervention, 110 semistructured qualitative interviews with key stakeholders at the international, national and subnational level were conducted and analysed.Military support to Sierra Leone’s Ebola response was found to result from the advocacy and careful planning of a small number of individuals operating in Freetown, alongside closed-door negotiations occurring at the highest level of government in the UK.This has important implications for understanding elite decision-making related to the militarisation of aid and the wider securitisation agenda.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信