{"title":"工具链的熟练沟通","authors":"Timm Felden","doi":"10.1109/SANER.2015.7081886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The creation of a program analysis toolchain involves design choices regarding intermediate representations (IRs). Good choices for an IR depend on the analyses performed by a toolchain. In academia, new analyses are developed frequently. Therefore, the best single IR of a research-oriented toolchain does not exist. Thus, we will describe our design of an IR that can be easily adapted to new requirements.","PeriodicalId":355949,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering (SANER)","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SKilLed communication for toolchains\",\"authors\":\"Timm Felden\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SANER.2015.7081886\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The creation of a program analysis toolchain involves design choices regarding intermediate representations (IRs). Good choices for an IR depend on the analyses performed by a toolchain. In academia, new analyses are developed frequently. Therefore, the best single IR of a research-oriented toolchain does not exist. Thus, we will describe our design of an IR that can be easily adapted to new requirements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":355949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering (SANER)\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering (SANER)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER.2015.7081886\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering (SANER)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER.2015.7081886","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The creation of a program analysis toolchain involves design choices regarding intermediate representations (IRs). Good choices for an IR depend on the analyses performed by a toolchain. In academia, new analyses are developed frequently. Therefore, the best single IR of a research-oriented toolchain does not exist. Thus, we will describe our design of an IR that can be easily adapted to new requirements.