{"title":"空间自相关与地名歧义","authors":"T. Brunner, R. Purves","doi":"10.1145/1460007.1460013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we explore the spatial distribution of the referents of ambiguous toponyms and compare it to the distribution of randomly selected unambiguous toponym pairs. We show that for a number of gazetteers, ambiguous toponyms are spatially autocorrelated and that typical autocorrelations are similar to the size of document scopes for a newspaper corpus.","PeriodicalId":167948,"journal":{"name":"Workshop on Geographic Information Retrieval","volume":"303 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spatial autocorrelation and toponym ambiguity\",\"authors\":\"T. Brunner, R. Purves\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1460007.1460013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we explore the spatial distribution of the referents of ambiguous toponyms and compare it to the distribution of randomly selected unambiguous toponym pairs. We show that for a number of gazetteers, ambiguous toponyms are spatially autocorrelated and that typical autocorrelations are similar to the size of document scopes for a newspaper corpus.\",\"PeriodicalId\":167948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Workshop on Geographic Information Retrieval\",\"volume\":\"303 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Workshop on Geographic Information Retrieval\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1460007.1460013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workshop on Geographic Information Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1460007.1460013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
In this paper, we explore the spatial distribution of the referents of ambiguous toponyms and compare it to the distribution of randomly selected unambiguous toponym pairs. We show that for a number of gazetteers, ambiguous toponyms are spatially autocorrelated and that typical autocorrelations are similar to the size of document scopes for a newspaper corpus.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
