作为主体的他者:专制与民主的政治神学

C. Keller
{"title":"作为主体的他者:专制与民主的政治神学","authors":"C. Keller","doi":"10.29357/2789-1577.2022.20.2.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Сrisis of war leads some people of faith to the question – how can a God of love let such horrors happen? To us as subjects, to us as others?  Some with more Calvinist leanings may ask – how can this be part of God’s providential direction of history?  These are the questions of theodicy. They presume a standard view of God’s power as an omnipotent control, an omnipotence allowing some degree of human freedom, some version of the human subject’s responsibility. Let me emphasize that the driving question behind the theodicy question is that of divine power. If God has total control, if God is omnipotent in the classical sense, then evil is either directly willed by “Him”  or “permitted” – in which case He could step in to stop Putin, could give Putin a heart attack or a change of heart, but for His own inscrutable reasons chooses not to.  In other words the intimately disturbing question of theodicy comes down to the broader question of political theology.","PeriodicalId":131385,"journal":{"name":"Theological Reflections: Eastern European Journal of Theology","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Other as Subject: Political Theologies of Autocracy and Democracy\",\"authors\":\"C. Keller\",\"doi\":\"10.29357/2789-1577.2022.20.2.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Сrisis of war leads some people of faith to the question – how can a God of love let such horrors happen? To us as subjects, to us as others?  Some with more Calvinist leanings may ask – how can this be part of God’s providential direction of history?  These are the questions of theodicy. They presume a standard view of God’s power as an omnipotent control, an omnipotence allowing some degree of human freedom, some version of the human subject’s responsibility. Let me emphasize that the driving question behind the theodicy question is that of divine power. If God has total control, if God is omnipotent in the classical sense, then evil is either directly willed by “Him”  or “permitted” – in which case He could step in to stop Putin, could give Putin a heart attack or a change of heart, but for His own inscrutable reasons chooses not to.  In other words the intimately disturbing question of theodicy comes down to the broader question of political theology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":131385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theological Reflections: Eastern European Journal of Theology\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theological Reflections: Eastern European Journal of Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29357/2789-1577.2022.20.2.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theological Reflections: Eastern European Journal of Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29357/2789-1577.2022.20.2.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Сrisis的战争导致一些信仰的人的问题-上帝的爱怎么能让这样的恐怖发生?把我们当臣民,把我们当其他人?一些有加尔文主义倾向的人可能会问——这怎么可能是上帝天意引导历史的一部分呢?这些都是神正论的问题。他们认为上帝的权力是一种万能的控制,一种允许人类一定程度自由的全能,一种人类主体的责任。让我强调一下,神正论问题背后的驱动问题是神的力量。如果上帝完全控制一切,如果上帝在经典意义上是无所不能的,那么邪恶要么是“他”直接决定的,要么是“允许的”——在这种情况下,他可以介入阻止普京,可以让普京心脏病发作或改变心意,但出于他自己不可思议的原因,他选择不这样做。换句话说,神正论这个令人不安的问题,可以归结为政治神学这个更广泛的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Other as Subject: Political Theologies of Autocracy and Democracy
Сrisis of war leads some people of faith to the question – how can a God of love let such horrors happen? To us as subjects, to us as others?  Some with more Calvinist leanings may ask – how can this be part of God’s providential direction of history?  These are the questions of theodicy. They presume a standard view of God’s power as an omnipotent control, an omnipotence allowing some degree of human freedom, some version of the human subject’s responsibility. Let me emphasize that the driving question behind the theodicy question is that of divine power. If God has total control, if God is omnipotent in the classical sense, then evil is either directly willed by “Him”  or “permitted” – in which case He could step in to stop Putin, could give Putin a heart attack or a change of heart, but for His own inscrutable reasons chooses not to.  In other words the intimately disturbing question of theodicy comes down to the broader question of political theology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信