{"title":"作为主体的他者:专制与民主的政治神学","authors":"C. Keller","doi":"10.29357/2789-1577.2022.20.2.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Сrisis of war leads some people of faith to the question – how can a God of love let such horrors happen? To us as subjects, to us as others? Some with more Calvinist leanings may ask – how can this be part of God’s providential direction of history? These are the questions of theodicy. They presume a standard view of God’s power as an omnipotent control, an omnipotence allowing some degree of human freedom, some version of the human subject’s responsibility. Let me emphasize that the driving question behind the theodicy question is that of divine power. If God has total control, if God is omnipotent in the classical sense, then evil is either directly willed by “Him” or “permitted” – in which case He could step in to stop Putin, could give Putin a heart attack or a change of heart, but for His own inscrutable reasons chooses not to. In other words the intimately disturbing question of theodicy comes down to the broader question of political theology.","PeriodicalId":131385,"journal":{"name":"Theological Reflections: Eastern European Journal of Theology","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Other as Subject: Political Theologies of Autocracy and Democracy\",\"authors\":\"C. Keller\",\"doi\":\"10.29357/2789-1577.2022.20.2.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Сrisis of war leads some people of faith to the question – how can a God of love let such horrors happen? To us as subjects, to us as others? Some with more Calvinist leanings may ask – how can this be part of God’s providential direction of history? These are the questions of theodicy. They presume a standard view of God’s power as an omnipotent control, an omnipotence allowing some degree of human freedom, some version of the human subject’s responsibility. Let me emphasize that the driving question behind the theodicy question is that of divine power. If God has total control, if God is omnipotent in the classical sense, then evil is either directly willed by “Him” or “permitted” – in which case He could step in to stop Putin, could give Putin a heart attack or a change of heart, but for His own inscrutable reasons chooses not to. In other words the intimately disturbing question of theodicy comes down to the broader question of political theology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":131385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theological Reflections: Eastern European Journal of Theology\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theological Reflections: Eastern European Journal of Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29357/2789-1577.2022.20.2.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theological Reflections: Eastern European Journal of Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29357/2789-1577.2022.20.2.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Other as Subject: Political Theologies of Autocracy and Democracy
Сrisis of war leads some people of faith to the question – how can a God of love let such horrors happen? To us as subjects, to us as others? Some with more Calvinist leanings may ask – how can this be part of God’s providential direction of history? These are the questions of theodicy. They presume a standard view of God’s power as an omnipotent control, an omnipotence allowing some degree of human freedom, some version of the human subject’s responsibility. Let me emphasize that the driving question behind the theodicy question is that of divine power. If God has total control, if God is omnipotent in the classical sense, then evil is either directly willed by “Him” or “permitted” – in which case He could step in to stop Putin, could give Putin a heart attack or a change of heart, but for His own inscrutable reasons chooses not to. In other words the intimately disturbing question of theodicy comes down to the broader question of political theology.