双宽度加权模型计数

R. Ganian, Filip Pokr'yvka, André Schidler, Kirill Simonov, Stefan Szeider
{"title":"双宽度加权模型计数","authors":"R. Ganian, Filip Pokr'yvka, André Schidler, Kirill Simonov, Stefan Szeider","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2206.01706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bonnet et al. (FOCS 2020) introduced the graph invariant twin-width and showed that many NP-hard problems are tractable for graphs of bounded twin-width, generalizing similar results for other width measures, including treewidth and clique-width. In this paper, we investigate the use of twin-width for solving the propositional satisfiability problem (SAT) and propositional model counting. We particularly focus on Bounded-ones Weighted Model Counting (BWMC), which takes as input a CNF formula $F$ along with a bound $k$ and asks for the weighted sum of all models with at most $k$ positive literals. BWMC generalizes not only SAT but also (weighted) model counting. We develop the notion of\"signed\"twin-width of CNF formulas and establish that BWMC is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by the certified signed twin-width of $F$ plus $k$. We show that this result is tight: it is neither possible to drop the bound $k$ nor use the vanilla twin-width instead if one wishes to retain fixed-parameter tractability, even for the easier problem SAT. Our theoretical results are complemented with an empirical evaluation and comparison of signed twin-width on various classes of CNF formulas.","PeriodicalId":446175,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Weighted Model Counting with Twin-Width\",\"authors\":\"R. Ganian, Filip Pokr'yvka, André Schidler, Kirill Simonov, Stefan Szeider\",\"doi\":\"10.48550/arXiv.2206.01706\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bonnet et al. (FOCS 2020) introduced the graph invariant twin-width and showed that many NP-hard problems are tractable for graphs of bounded twin-width, generalizing similar results for other width measures, including treewidth and clique-width. In this paper, we investigate the use of twin-width for solving the propositional satisfiability problem (SAT) and propositional model counting. We particularly focus on Bounded-ones Weighted Model Counting (BWMC), which takes as input a CNF formula $F$ along with a bound $k$ and asks for the weighted sum of all models with at most $k$ positive literals. BWMC generalizes not only SAT but also (weighted) model counting. We develop the notion of\\\"signed\\\"twin-width of CNF formulas and establish that BWMC is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by the certified signed twin-width of $F$ plus $k$. We show that this result is tight: it is neither possible to drop the bound $k$ nor use the vanilla twin-width instead if one wishes to retain fixed-parameter tractability, even for the easier problem SAT. Our theoretical results are complemented with an empirical evaluation and comparison of signed twin-width on various classes of CNF formulas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":446175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.01706\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.01706","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

Bonnet等人(FOCS 2020)引入了图不变双宽度,并表明许多NP-hard问题对于有界双宽度的图是可处理的,并将类似的结果推广到其他宽度度量,包括树宽度和团宽度。本文研究了双宽度在命题可满足性问题(SAT)和命题模型计数中的应用。我们特别关注有界加权模型计数(BWMC),它将CNF公式$F$和有界$k$作为输入,并要求具有最多$k$正数的所有模型的加权和。BWMC不仅推广了SAT,而且推广了(加权)模型计数。我们提出了CNF公式的“有符号”双宽度的概念,并证明了当用F + k的证明有符号双宽度参数化时,BWMC是固定参数可处理的。我们证明了这个结果是紧密的:如果希望保持固定参数的可追溯性,即使对于更简单的SAT问题,也不可能放弃界$k$或使用普通的双宽度。我们的理论结果与各种CNF公式上的有符号双宽度的经验评估和比较相补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Weighted Model Counting with Twin-Width
Bonnet et al. (FOCS 2020) introduced the graph invariant twin-width and showed that many NP-hard problems are tractable for graphs of bounded twin-width, generalizing similar results for other width measures, including treewidth and clique-width. In this paper, we investigate the use of twin-width for solving the propositional satisfiability problem (SAT) and propositional model counting. We particularly focus on Bounded-ones Weighted Model Counting (BWMC), which takes as input a CNF formula $F$ along with a bound $k$ and asks for the weighted sum of all models with at most $k$ positive literals. BWMC generalizes not only SAT but also (weighted) model counting. We develop the notion of"signed"twin-width of CNF formulas and establish that BWMC is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by the certified signed twin-width of $F$ plus $k$. We show that this result is tight: it is neither possible to drop the bound $k$ nor use the vanilla twin-width instead if one wishes to retain fixed-parameter tractability, even for the easier problem SAT. Our theoretical results are complemented with an empirical evaluation and comparison of signed twin-width on various classes of CNF formulas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信