楼宇控制中MPC策略的比较

Ján Drgoňa, M. Kvasnica
{"title":"楼宇控制中MPC策略的比较","authors":"Ján Drgoňa, M. Kvasnica","doi":"10.1109/PC.2013.6581444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose three different Model Predictive Control (MPC) strategies for controlling temperatures in buildings. We show that maximization of thermal comfort, along with minimization of energy consumption, can be cast in various ways, each having their pros and cons. The three strategies include tracking of setpoint temperatures, tracking of a comfort zone, and minimization of number of violations of such a zone. Even though the latter formulation is the most demanding from a computational point of view, it indeed provides best thermal comfort. All proposed methods are compared with respect to two qualitative criteria on simulations.","PeriodicalId":232418,"journal":{"name":"2013 International Conference on Process Control (PC)","volume":"207 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of MPC strategies for building control\",\"authors\":\"Ján Drgoňa, M. Kvasnica\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PC.2013.6581444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We propose three different Model Predictive Control (MPC) strategies for controlling temperatures in buildings. We show that maximization of thermal comfort, along with minimization of energy consumption, can be cast in various ways, each having their pros and cons. The three strategies include tracking of setpoint temperatures, tracking of a comfort zone, and minimization of number of violations of such a zone. Even though the latter formulation is the most demanding from a computational point of view, it indeed provides best thermal comfort. All proposed methods are compared with respect to two qualitative criteria on simulations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":232418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 International Conference on Process Control (PC)\",\"volume\":\"207 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 International Conference on Process Control (PC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PC.2013.6581444\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 International Conference on Process Control (PC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PC.2013.6581444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

我们提出了三种不同的模型预测控制(MPC)策略来控制建筑物的温度。我们表明,热舒适的最大化以及能耗的最小化可以通过各种方式实现,每种方式都有其优点和缺点。这三种策略包括跟踪设定点温度、跟踪舒适区域以及最小化违反该区域的次数。尽管从计算的角度来看,后一种公式是最苛刻的,但它确实提供了最好的热舒适。根据模拟的两个定性标准对所有提出的方法进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of MPC strategies for building control
We propose three different Model Predictive Control (MPC) strategies for controlling temperatures in buildings. We show that maximization of thermal comfort, along with minimization of energy consumption, can be cast in various ways, each having their pros and cons. The three strategies include tracking of setpoint temperatures, tracking of a comfort zone, and minimization of number of violations of such a zone. Even though the latter formulation is the most demanding from a computational point of view, it indeed provides best thermal comfort. All proposed methods are compared with respect to two qualitative criteria on simulations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信