增材制造系统的网络安全需求:国防部环境中的新实施和实施资源

Mark J. Cotteleer, Simon S. Goldenberg, I. Wing, Oyindamola Alliyu, Stephen Kania, Veda Mujumdar, B. Sniderman
{"title":"增材制造系统的网络安全需求:国防部环境中的新实施和实施资源","authors":"Mark J. Cotteleer, Simon S. Goldenberg, I. Wing, Oyindamola Alliyu, Stephen Kania, Veda Mujumdar, B. Sniderman","doi":"10.1145/3462223.3485624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) for the US Department of Defense (DoD) released Audit of the Cybersecurity of Department of Defense Additive Manufacturing Systems (DODIG-2021-098) [1] in July 2021, to determine \"whether DoD [sites] secured additive manufacturing (AM) systems to prevent unauthorized changes and ensure the integrity of the design data.\" The audit report recommends requiring \"all AM systems to obtain an authority to operate in accordance with DoD policy before their use\" [1], and requiring \"AM system owners to immediately identify and implement security controls to minimize risk until obtaining an authority to operate.\" [1] The DoD Chief Information Officer (CIO) responded that existing DoD regulations require both of these for \"all IT systems, including AM systems\" [1]. Such cyber security rules can help guard against vulnerabilities such as design file theft or digital thread hacking, as well as unauthorized prints on AM systems that can impact the safety and integrity of parts used in defense systems, expose critical intellectual property to bad actors and even cause manufacturing facilities to shut down. To improve AM system vendors' understanding of these cybersecurity requirements for DoD and the US Government (USG), we discuss in this paper the process for obtaining an Authority To Operate (ATO) certification for an IT system per DoD and USG cybersecurity regulations, i.e., the Risk Management Framework (RMF) process from the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) [2]. We also describe resources for AM system vendors to understand and implement the RMF process for obtaining an ATO certification, particularly in the DoD environment. [1] Department of Defense Office of Inspector General. 2021. Audit of the Cybersecurity of Department of Defense Additive Manufacturing Systems (DODIG-2021-098). https://www.dodig.mil/reports.html/article/2683843/audit-of-the-cybersecurity-of-department-of-defense-additive-manufacturing-syst/ Full report at: https://media.defense.gov/2021/Jul/07/2002757308/-1/-1/1/DODIG-2021-098.PDF [2]NIST Information Technology Laboratory Computer Security Resource Center. 2021. About the Risk Management Framework (RMF): A Comprehensive, Flexible, Risk-Based Approach https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/risk-management/about-rmf","PeriodicalId":113006,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2021 Workshop on Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing) Security","volume":"353 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cybersecurity Requirements for AM Systems: New Enforcement in DoD Environments, and Resources for Implementation\",\"authors\":\"Mark J. Cotteleer, Simon S. Goldenberg, I. Wing, Oyindamola Alliyu, Stephen Kania, Veda Mujumdar, B. Sniderman\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3462223.3485624\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) for the US Department of Defense (DoD) released Audit of the Cybersecurity of Department of Defense Additive Manufacturing Systems (DODIG-2021-098) [1] in July 2021, to determine \\\"whether DoD [sites] secured additive manufacturing (AM) systems to prevent unauthorized changes and ensure the integrity of the design data.\\\" The audit report recommends requiring \\\"all AM systems to obtain an authority to operate in accordance with DoD policy before their use\\\" [1], and requiring \\\"AM system owners to immediately identify and implement security controls to minimize risk until obtaining an authority to operate.\\\" [1] The DoD Chief Information Officer (CIO) responded that existing DoD regulations require both of these for \\\"all IT systems, including AM systems\\\" [1]. Such cyber security rules can help guard against vulnerabilities such as design file theft or digital thread hacking, as well as unauthorized prints on AM systems that can impact the safety and integrity of parts used in defense systems, expose critical intellectual property to bad actors and even cause manufacturing facilities to shut down. To improve AM system vendors' understanding of these cybersecurity requirements for DoD and the US Government (USG), we discuss in this paper the process for obtaining an Authority To Operate (ATO) certification for an IT system per DoD and USG cybersecurity regulations, i.e., the Risk Management Framework (RMF) process from the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) [2]. We also describe resources for AM system vendors to understand and implement the RMF process for obtaining an ATO certification, particularly in the DoD environment. [1] Department of Defense Office of Inspector General. 2021. Audit of the Cybersecurity of Department of Defense Additive Manufacturing Systems (DODIG-2021-098). https://www.dodig.mil/reports.html/article/2683843/audit-of-the-cybersecurity-of-department-of-defense-additive-manufacturing-syst/ Full report at: https://media.defense.gov/2021/Jul/07/2002757308/-1/-1/1/DODIG-2021-098.PDF [2]NIST Information Technology Laboratory Computer Security Resource Center. 2021. About the Risk Management Framework (RMF): A Comprehensive, Flexible, Risk-Based Approach https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/risk-management/about-rmf\",\"PeriodicalId\":113006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2021 Workshop on Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing) Security\",\"volume\":\"353 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2021 Workshop on Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing) Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3462223.3485624\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2021 Workshop on Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing) Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3462223.3485624","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国国防部监察长办公室(OIG)于2021年7月发布了国防部增材制造系统网络安全审计(DODIG-2021-098)[1],以确定“国防部[站点]是否保护增材制造(AM)系统以防止未经授权的更改并确保设计数据的完整性。”审计报告建议要求“所有AM系统在使用b[1]之前获得按照国防部政策运行的权限”,并要求“AM系统所有者立即识别和实施安全控制,以最大限度地降低风险,直到获得操作权限”。国防部首席信息官(CIO)回应说,现有的国防部法规要求“所有IT系统,包括AM系统”都具备这两种功能。此类网络安全规则可以帮助防范设计文件盗窃或数字线程黑客攻击等漏洞,以及AM系统上未经授权的打印,这些漏洞可能会影响国防系统中使用的部件的安全性和完整性,将关键知识产权暴露给不良行为者,甚至导致制造设施关闭。为了提高增材制造系统供应商对国防部和美国政府(USG)这些网络安全要求的理解,我们在本文中讨论了根据国防部和USG网络安全法规为IT系统获得运营授权(ATO)认证的过程,即美国国家标准与技术研究院(NIST)[2]的风险管理框架(RMF)过程。我们还描述了增材制造系统供应商了解和实现RMF过程以获得ATO认证的资源,特别是在国防部环境中。[1]国防部监察长办公室。2021。国防部增材制造系统网络安全审计(DODIG-2021-098)。https://www.dodig.mil/reports.html/article/2683843/audit-of-the-cybersecurity-of-department-of-defense-additive-manufacturing-syst/报告全文:https://media.defense.gov/2021/Jul/07/2002757308/-1/-1/1/DODIG-2021-098.PDF [2]NIST信息技术实验室计算机安全资源中心。2021。关于风险管理框架(RMF):一种全面、灵活、基于风险的方法https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/risk-management/about-rmf
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cybersecurity Requirements for AM Systems: New Enforcement in DoD Environments, and Resources for Implementation
The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) for the US Department of Defense (DoD) released Audit of the Cybersecurity of Department of Defense Additive Manufacturing Systems (DODIG-2021-098) [1] in July 2021, to determine "whether DoD [sites] secured additive manufacturing (AM) systems to prevent unauthorized changes and ensure the integrity of the design data." The audit report recommends requiring "all AM systems to obtain an authority to operate in accordance with DoD policy before their use" [1], and requiring "AM system owners to immediately identify and implement security controls to minimize risk until obtaining an authority to operate." [1] The DoD Chief Information Officer (CIO) responded that existing DoD regulations require both of these for "all IT systems, including AM systems" [1]. Such cyber security rules can help guard against vulnerabilities such as design file theft or digital thread hacking, as well as unauthorized prints on AM systems that can impact the safety and integrity of parts used in defense systems, expose critical intellectual property to bad actors and even cause manufacturing facilities to shut down. To improve AM system vendors' understanding of these cybersecurity requirements for DoD and the US Government (USG), we discuss in this paper the process for obtaining an Authority To Operate (ATO) certification for an IT system per DoD and USG cybersecurity regulations, i.e., the Risk Management Framework (RMF) process from the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) [2]. We also describe resources for AM system vendors to understand and implement the RMF process for obtaining an ATO certification, particularly in the DoD environment. [1] Department of Defense Office of Inspector General. 2021. Audit of the Cybersecurity of Department of Defense Additive Manufacturing Systems (DODIG-2021-098). https://www.dodig.mil/reports.html/article/2683843/audit-of-the-cybersecurity-of-department-of-defense-additive-manufacturing-syst/ Full report at: https://media.defense.gov/2021/Jul/07/2002757308/-1/-1/1/DODIG-2021-098.PDF [2]NIST Information Technology Laboratory Computer Security Resource Center. 2021. About the Risk Management Framework (RMF): A Comprehensive, Flexible, Risk-Based Approach https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/risk-management/about-rmf
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信