神话与现实

Edward M. Schrock, Henry L. Lefevre
{"title":"神话与现实","authors":"Edward M. Schrock, Henry L. Lefevre","doi":"10.1201/9781003065937-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Firstly, Semi-Pelagianism exerts a pervasive influence amongst traditionally Arminian churches. Many churches that would consider themselves Arminian, as opposed to Calvinist, actually preach and practice their Christianity in a way that shows their core beliefs are not consistent with classical Arminian doctrine. Olson highlights the critical distinctions between classical Arminianism and semi-Pelagianism throughout his book. If semi-Pelagianism is a serious deviation from evangelical doctrine—as it certainly is—then a comprehensive corrective is much needed.","PeriodicalId":171978,"journal":{"name":"The Good and the Bad News About Quality","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Myths and Realities\",\"authors\":\"Edward M. Schrock, Henry L. Lefevre\",\"doi\":\"10.1201/9781003065937-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Firstly, Semi-Pelagianism exerts a pervasive influence amongst traditionally Arminian churches. Many churches that would consider themselves Arminian, as opposed to Calvinist, actually preach and practice their Christianity in a way that shows their core beliefs are not consistent with classical Arminian doctrine. Olson highlights the critical distinctions between classical Arminianism and semi-Pelagianism throughout his book. If semi-Pelagianism is a serious deviation from evangelical doctrine—as it certainly is—then a comprehensive corrective is much needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":171978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Good and the Bad News About Quality\",\"volume\":\"99 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Good and the Bad News About Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003065937-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Good and the Bad News About Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003065937-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

首先,半伯拉纠主义在传统的阿民念派教会中有着广泛的影响。许多认为自己是阿民念主义的教会,而不是加尔文主义的教会,实际上以一种方式宣讲和实践基督教,表明他们的核心信仰与经典阿民念主义教义不一致。奥尔森在他的书中强调了古典阿米念主义和半伯拉纠主义之间的关键区别。如果半伯拉纠主义是对福音教义的严重背离——它确实是——那么全面的纠正是非常必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Myths and Realities
Firstly, Semi-Pelagianism exerts a pervasive influence amongst traditionally Arminian churches. Many churches that would consider themselves Arminian, as opposed to Calvinist, actually preach and practice their Christianity in a way that shows their core beliefs are not consistent with classical Arminian doctrine. Olson highlights the critical distinctions between classical Arminianism and semi-Pelagianism throughout his book. If semi-Pelagianism is a serious deviation from evangelical doctrine—as it certainly is—then a comprehensive corrective is much needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信