受约束通道上的争用解析

Elijah Hradovich, M. Klonowski, D. Kowalski
{"title":"受约束通道上的争用解析","authors":"Elijah Hradovich, M. Klonowski, D. Kowalski","doi":"10.1109/ICPADS51040.2020.00022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine deterministic contention resolution on a multiple-access channel when packets are injected continuously by an adversary to the buffers of $n$ available stations in the system, arbitrarily at rate at most $\\rho$ packets per round. The aim is to successfully transmit packets and maintain system stability, that is, bounded queues, even in infinite executions. The largest injection rate for which a given contention resolution algorithm guaranties stability is called (algorithm's) throughput. In contrast to the previous work, we consider a channel in which there is a strict limit $k$ on the total number of stations allowed to transmit or listen to the channel at a given time, that can never be exceeded; we call such channel a $k$-restrained channel. We construct adaptive and full sensing protocols with optimal throughput 1 and almost optimal throughput $1-1/n$, respectively, in a constant-restrained channel. By contrast, we show that restricted protocols based on schedules known in advance obtain throughput at most $\\min\\{\\frac{k}{n}, \\frac{1}{3\\log n}\\}$. We also support our theoretical analysis by simulation results of our algorithms in systems of moderate, realistic sizes and scenarios, and compare them with popular backoff protocols.","PeriodicalId":196548,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE 26th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS)","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contention resolution on a restrained channel\",\"authors\":\"Elijah Hradovich, M. Klonowski, D. Kowalski\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICPADS51040.2020.00022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We examine deterministic contention resolution on a multiple-access channel when packets are injected continuously by an adversary to the buffers of $n$ available stations in the system, arbitrarily at rate at most $\\\\rho$ packets per round. The aim is to successfully transmit packets and maintain system stability, that is, bounded queues, even in infinite executions. The largest injection rate for which a given contention resolution algorithm guaranties stability is called (algorithm's) throughput. In contrast to the previous work, we consider a channel in which there is a strict limit $k$ on the total number of stations allowed to transmit or listen to the channel at a given time, that can never be exceeded; we call such channel a $k$-restrained channel. We construct adaptive and full sensing protocols with optimal throughput 1 and almost optimal throughput $1-1/n$, respectively, in a constant-restrained channel. By contrast, we show that restricted protocols based on schedules known in advance obtain throughput at most $\\\\min\\\\{\\\\frac{k}{n}, \\\\frac{1}{3\\\\log n}\\\\}$. We also support our theoretical analysis by simulation results of our algorithms in systems of moderate, realistic sizes and scenarios, and compare them with popular backoff protocols.\",\"PeriodicalId\":196548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE 26th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS)\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE 26th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPADS51040.2020.00022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE 26th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPADS51040.2020.00022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

当对手连续地将数据包注入系统中$n$可用站的缓冲区时,我们检查了多址通道上的确定性争用解决方案,任意速率最多为每轮$\rho$个数据包。其目的是成功传输数据包并保持系统稳定性,即有界队列,即使在无限执行中也是如此。给定争用解决算法保证稳定性的最大注入速率称为(算法)吞吐量。与之前的工作相反,我们考虑一个频道,其中在给定时间允许传输或收听该频道的电台总数有严格限制$k$,该限制永远不会超过;我们称这种通道为$k$约束通道。我们在恒定约束的信道中分别构建了具有最优吞吐量1和几乎最优吞吐量$1-1/n$的自适应和全感知协议。相比之下,我们表明基于事先已知调度的受限协议最多可获得$\min\{\frac{k}{n}, \frac{1}{3\log n}\}$吞吐量。我们还通过我们的算法在中等、现实规模和场景的系统中的模拟结果来支持我们的理论分析,并将它们与流行的后退协议进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contention resolution on a restrained channel
We examine deterministic contention resolution on a multiple-access channel when packets are injected continuously by an adversary to the buffers of $n$ available stations in the system, arbitrarily at rate at most $\rho$ packets per round. The aim is to successfully transmit packets and maintain system stability, that is, bounded queues, even in infinite executions. The largest injection rate for which a given contention resolution algorithm guaranties stability is called (algorithm's) throughput. In contrast to the previous work, we consider a channel in which there is a strict limit $k$ on the total number of stations allowed to transmit or listen to the channel at a given time, that can never be exceeded; we call such channel a $k$-restrained channel. We construct adaptive and full sensing protocols with optimal throughput 1 and almost optimal throughput $1-1/n$, respectively, in a constant-restrained channel. By contrast, we show that restricted protocols based on schedules known in advance obtain throughput at most $\min\{\frac{k}{n}, \frac{1}{3\log n}\}$. We also support our theoretical analysis by simulation results of our algorithms in systems of moderate, realistic sizes and scenarios, and compare them with popular backoff protocols.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信