{"title":"根据沃利斯的公式","authors":"D. K. Kazarinoff","doi":"10.1017/S095018430000029X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the course of mathematical progress new truths are discovered while older ones are sometimes more precisely articulated and often generalised. Because of their elegance and simplicity, however, some classical statements have been left unchanged. As an example, I have in mind the celebrated formula of John Wallis, which for more than a century has been quoted by writers of textbooks. Usually this formula is written as In this note it is shown that ¼","PeriodicalId":417997,"journal":{"name":"Edinburgh Mathematical Notes","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Wallis' formula\",\"authors\":\"D. K. Kazarinoff\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S095018430000029X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the course of mathematical progress new truths are discovered while older ones are sometimes more precisely articulated and often generalised. Because of their elegance and simplicity, however, some classical statements have been left unchanged. As an example, I have in mind the celebrated formula of John Wallis, which for more than a century has been quoted by writers of textbooks. Usually this formula is written as In this note it is shown that ¼\",\"PeriodicalId\":417997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Edinburgh Mathematical Notes\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Edinburgh Mathematical Notes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S095018430000029X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edinburgh Mathematical Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S095018430000029X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
In the course of mathematical progress new truths are discovered while older ones are sometimes more precisely articulated and often generalised. Because of their elegance and simplicity, however, some classical statements have been left unchanged. As an example, I have in mind the celebrated formula of John Wallis, which for more than a century has been quoted by writers of textbooks. Usually this formula is written as In this note it is shown that ¼