共同海损与其他:早期现代海上风险缓解的法律与经济学

Ron Harris
{"title":"共同海损与其他:早期现代海上风险缓解的法律与经济学","authors":"Ron Harris","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3739491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The environment of pre-modern maritime trade activities was, in economists’ terms, one of uncertainties, high risks, vast information asymmetries, augmented agency problems, weak enforcement of contracts, and fragile protection of property rights. Dealing with such a tough environment was a foremost institutional challenge for pre-modern contemporary merchants, jurists, and rulers. Maritime trade is where the institutional cutting-edge could be found. This is where new and innovative organizational solutions, such as general average, insurance and the business corporation, were designed.<br><br>Traditional historical analysis is good at reconstructing the pattern of development of maritime trade institutions, but it is not as good at explaining the timing of origins and path of evolution of these institutions. I will use here a theoretical framework that combines insights from Frank Knight, Douglass North and Robert Scott. Knight calls attention to the role of information in the shift from uncertainty to risk and the development of insurance. North calls our attention to the role of information in reducing transaction costs and enhancing growth. Scott reminds us that institutions involve contractual drafting and that contracts can deal with information shortage and information generation. This framework focuses our attention on how to solve the informational challenges with respect to risk assessment and pricing and contractual. It takes us a long way forward in understanding the history of risk mitigation trade institutions.<br><br>The history of organizational solutions for mitigation of maritime uncertainties and risks, from general average and sea loan to insurance and the business corporation benefits from and contribute to the theory of institutional development more generally.","PeriodicalId":254768,"journal":{"name":"Legal History eJournal","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"General Average and All the Rest: The Law and Economics of Early Modern Maritime Risk Mitigation\",\"authors\":\"Ron Harris\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3739491\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The environment of pre-modern maritime trade activities was, in economists’ terms, one of uncertainties, high risks, vast information asymmetries, augmented agency problems, weak enforcement of contracts, and fragile protection of property rights. Dealing with such a tough environment was a foremost institutional challenge for pre-modern contemporary merchants, jurists, and rulers. Maritime trade is where the institutional cutting-edge could be found. This is where new and innovative organizational solutions, such as general average, insurance and the business corporation, were designed.<br><br>Traditional historical analysis is good at reconstructing the pattern of development of maritime trade institutions, but it is not as good at explaining the timing of origins and path of evolution of these institutions. I will use here a theoretical framework that combines insights from Frank Knight, Douglass North and Robert Scott. Knight calls attention to the role of information in the shift from uncertainty to risk and the development of insurance. North calls our attention to the role of information in reducing transaction costs and enhancing growth. Scott reminds us that institutions involve contractual drafting and that contracts can deal with information shortage and information generation. This framework focuses our attention on how to solve the informational challenges with respect to risk assessment and pricing and contractual. It takes us a long way forward in understanding the history of risk mitigation trade institutions.<br><br>The history of organizational solutions for mitigation of maritime uncertainties and risks, from general average and sea loan to insurance and the business corporation benefits from and contribute to the theory of institutional development more generally.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legal History eJournal\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legal History eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3739491\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal History eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3739491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

用经济学家的话说,前现代海上贸易活动的环境是不确定的、高风险的、巨大的信息不对称的、增加的代理问题、合同执行不力和脆弱的产权保护。对于前现代时代的商人、法学家和统治者来说,应对这样严酷的环境是最重要的制度挑战。海上贸易是可以找到制度前沿的地方。这就是设计新的和创新的组织解决方案的地方,例如共同海损,保险和商业公司。传统的历史分析善于重构海上贸易制度的发展格局,但对海上贸易制度产生的时间和演变路径的解释却不够充分。我将在这里使用一个理论框架,它结合了弗兰克·奈特、道格拉斯·诺斯和罗伯特·斯科特的见解。奈特呼吁人们注意信息在从不确定性到风险的转变和保险发展中的作用。诺斯提醒我们注意信息在降低交易成本和促进增长方面的作用。斯科特提醒我们,制度涉及合同起草,合同可以处理信息短缺和信息生成。该框架将我们的注意力集中在如何解决风险评估、定价和合同方面的信息挑战上。在了解风险缓解贸易机构的历史方面,我们还有很长的路要走。减轻海事不确定性和风险的组织解决办法的历史,从共同海损和海上贷款到保险和商业公司,从更普遍的制度发展理论中受益并作出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
General Average and All the Rest: The Law and Economics of Early Modern Maritime Risk Mitigation
The environment of pre-modern maritime trade activities was, in economists’ terms, one of uncertainties, high risks, vast information asymmetries, augmented agency problems, weak enforcement of contracts, and fragile protection of property rights. Dealing with such a tough environment was a foremost institutional challenge for pre-modern contemporary merchants, jurists, and rulers. Maritime trade is where the institutional cutting-edge could be found. This is where new and innovative organizational solutions, such as general average, insurance and the business corporation, were designed.

Traditional historical analysis is good at reconstructing the pattern of development of maritime trade institutions, but it is not as good at explaining the timing of origins and path of evolution of these institutions. I will use here a theoretical framework that combines insights from Frank Knight, Douglass North and Robert Scott. Knight calls attention to the role of information in the shift from uncertainty to risk and the development of insurance. North calls our attention to the role of information in reducing transaction costs and enhancing growth. Scott reminds us that institutions involve contractual drafting and that contracts can deal with information shortage and information generation. This framework focuses our attention on how to solve the informational challenges with respect to risk assessment and pricing and contractual. It takes us a long way forward in understanding the history of risk mitigation trade institutions.

The history of organizational solutions for mitigation of maritime uncertainties and risks, from general average and sea loan to insurance and the business corporation benefits from and contribute to the theory of institutional development more generally.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信