新型改进的无线传感器网络通信稳定路由与网络边界维护路由的性能分析

T. Anitha, S. Sridhar
{"title":"新型改进的无线传感器网络通信稳定路由与网络边界维护路由的性能分析","authors":"T. Anitha, S. Sridhar","doi":"10.1109/ICECONF57129.2023.10083655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main intention of the work is to achieve packet transmission steadiness for any abnormal condition and to detect the invalid path in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN), using a novel improved communication steadiness routing (ICSR) over Cluster-Chain Mobile Agent Routing (CCM) is implemented. Materials and Methods: ICSR and CCM are implemented in this research work to increase path stability and minimize energy consumption in order to improve communication. Sample size is considered using $\\mathbf{G}$ power software and determined as 10 per group with pretest power 80%, threshold 0.05% and CI 95%. Results: To discover the incorrect path, a void path identification technique is used if a path is not kept active for an extended period of time, nodes in the route may miss data packets while communicating to each other. As a result, an energy-efficient stable way for routing is required to minimize energy consumption and increase path stability. Path stability, network lifetime, end to end delay packet delivery ratio, and energy consumption, network overhead are the metrics used to measure the performance of ICSR and CCM models at different study groups with $\\boldsymbol{\\mathrm{p} < 0.05}$. ICSR provides a higher of 94.05% compared to CCM with 79.56% in minimizing energy consumption and to increase path stability. The significant charge was 0.000 $\\boldsymbol{(\\mathrm{P} < 0.05)}$ showing that two groups were statistically noteworthy. Conclusion: The Novel Improved Communication Steadiness Routing model's performance is compared with Cluster-Chain Mobile agent routing (CCM) model, from the results it is clear that ICSR outperforms CCM model in all the parameters.","PeriodicalId":436733,"journal":{"name":"2023 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Discovery in Concurrent Engineering (ICECONF)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel Improved Communication Steadiness Routing for Wireless Sensor Network's Performance Analysis compared with Network Boundary Maintenance Routing\",\"authors\":\"T. Anitha, S. Sridhar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICECONF57129.2023.10083655\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main intention of the work is to achieve packet transmission steadiness for any abnormal condition and to detect the invalid path in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN), using a novel improved communication steadiness routing (ICSR) over Cluster-Chain Mobile Agent Routing (CCM) is implemented. Materials and Methods: ICSR and CCM are implemented in this research work to increase path stability and minimize energy consumption in order to improve communication. Sample size is considered using $\\\\mathbf{G}$ power software and determined as 10 per group with pretest power 80%, threshold 0.05% and CI 95%. Results: To discover the incorrect path, a void path identification technique is used if a path is not kept active for an extended period of time, nodes in the route may miss data packets while communicating to each other. As a result, an energy-efficient stable way for routing is required to minimize energy consumption and increase path stability. Path stability, network lifetime, end to end delay packet delivery ratio, and energy consumption, network overhead are the metrics used to measure the performance of ICSR and CCM models at different study groups with $\\\\boldsymbol{\\\\mathrm{p} < 0.05}$. ICSR provides a higher of 94.05% compared to CCM with 79.56% in minimizing energy consumption and to increase path stability. The significant charge was 0.000 $\\\\boldsymbol{(\\\\mathrm{P} < 0.05)}$ showing that two groups were statistically noteworthy. Conclusion: The Novel Improved Communication Steadiness Routing model's performance is compared with Cluster-Chain Mobile agent routing (CCM) model, from the results it is clear that ICSR outperforms CCM model in all the parameters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":436733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Discovery in Concurrent Engineering (ICECONF)\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Discovery in Concurrent Engineering (ICECONF)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECONF57129.2023.10083655\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Discovery in Concurrent Engineering (ICECONF)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECONF57129.2023.10083655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在无线传感器网络(WSN)中,采用一种新的改进的通信稳定性路由(ICSR),在群集链移动代理路由(CCM)的基础上实现了在任何异常情况下的数据包传输稳定性和检测无效路径。材料和方法:ICSR和CCM在本研究工作中实施,以增加路径稳定性和最小化能耗,以改善通信。使用$\mathbf{G}$ power软件考虑样本量,确定为每组10个,预试功率为80%,阈值为0.05%,CI为95%。结果:为了发现错误的路径,需要使用空路径识别技术,如果某条路径长时间处于不激活状态,可能会导致该路由中的节点在相互通信时丢包。因此,需要一种节能稳定的路由方式,以最小化能量消耗并增加路径稳定性。路径稳定性、网络生存期、端到端延迟数据包传送率、能量消耗、网络开销是衡量ICSR和CCM模型在不同研究组的性能的指标,$\boldsymbol{\mathrm{p} < 0.05}$。在最小化能耗和提高路径稳定性方面,ICSR比CCM的79.56%提供了更高的94.05%。显著收费为0.000 $\boldsymbol{(\mathrm{P} < 0.05)}$,表明两组在统计学上具有显著性。结论:将改进的通信稳定性路由模型与簇链移动代理路由(CCM)模型的性能进行了比较,结果表明ICSR在所有参数上都优于CCM模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Novel Improved Communication Steadiness Routing for Wireless Sensor Network's Performance Analysis compared with Network Boundary Maintenance Routing
The main intention of the work is to achieve packet transmission steadiness for any abnormal condition and to detect the invalid path in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN), using a novel improved communication steadiness routing (ICSR) over Cluster-Chain Mobile Agent Routing (CCM) is implemented. Materials and Methods: ICSR and CCM are implemented in this research work to increase path stability and minimize energy consumption in order to improve communication. Sample size is considered using $\mathbf{G}$ power software and determined as 10 per group with pretest power 80%, threshold 0.05% and CI 95%. Results: To discover the incorrect path, a void path identification technique is used if a path is not kept active for an extended period of time, nodes in the route may miss data packets while communicating to each other. As a result, an energy-efficient stable way for routing is required to minimize energy consumption and increase path stability. Path stability, network lifetime, end to end delay packet delivery ratio, and energy consumption, network overhead are the metrics used to measure the performance of ICSR and CCM models at different study groups with $\boldsymbol{\mathrm{p} < 0.05}$. ICSR provides a higher of 94.05% compared to CCM with 79.56% in minimizing energy consumption and to increase path stability. The significant charge was 0.000 $\boldsymbol{(\mathrm{P} < 0.05)}$ showing that two groups were statistically noteworthy. Conclusion: The Novel Improved Communication Steadiness Routing model's performance is compared with Cluster-Chain Mobile agent routing (CCM) model, from the results it is clear that ICSR outperforms CCM model in all the parameters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信