定义和分析凤凰活动

H. Anderson, Ann O’Connell, I. Ramsay, M. Welsh, H. Withers
{"title":"定义和分析凤凰活动","authors":"H. Anderson, Ann O’Connell, I. Ramsay, M. Welsh, H. Withers","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2536248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Phoenix activity occurs where the business of a failed company is transferred to a second (typically newly incorporated) company and the second company’s controllers are the same as the first company’s controllers. Phoenix activity can be legal as well as illegal. Phoenix activity has become a significant concern for governments because of the number of individuals promoting illegal phoenix activity, the significant loss of tax revenue it causes, and the recognition of the potentially devastating impact it has on creditors and employees. A key problem faced by regulators is the difficulty associated with identifying whether particular phoenix activity is illegal or not. This report (which forms part of a larger research project) profiles the characteristics of both legal and illegal phoenix activity to assist regulators in formulating education, detection, and enforcement strategies. The report examines the various historical attempts to define phoenix activity and then identifies the following five categories of phoenix activity and provides examples of each: (1) the legal phoenix or business rescue; (2) the problematic phoenix; (3) illegal type 1 phoenix: intention to avoid debts formed as company starts to fail; (4) illegal type 2 phoenix: phoenix as a business model; and (5) complex illegal phoenix activity.The report also examines the role of professional advisors in facilitating illegal phoenix activity, the victims of illegal phoenix activity (including governments, unsecured trade creditors and employees) and two industries (the building and construction industry and the financial services industry) where illegal phoenix activity has been identified as a particular concern.","PeriodicalId":223837,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Criminal Law (Public Law - Crime) (Topic)","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining and Profiling Phoenix Activity\",\"authors\":\"H. Anderson, Ann O’Connell, I. Ramsay, M. Welsh, H. Withers\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2536248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Phoenix activity occurs where the business of a failed company is transferred to a second (typically newly incorporated) company and the second company’s controllers are the same as the first company’s controllers. Phoenix activity can be legal as well as illegal. Phoenix activity has become a significant concern for governments because of the number of individuals promoting illegal phoenix activity, the significant loss of tax revenue it causes, and the recognition of the potentially devastating impact it has on creditors and employees. A key problem faced by regulators is the difficulty associated with identifying whether particular phoenix activity is illegal or not. This report (which forms part of a larger research project) profiles the characteristics of both legal and illegal phoenix activity to assist regulators in formulating education, detection, and enforcement strategies. The report examines the various historical attempts to define phoenix activity and then identifies the following five categories of phoenix activity and provides examples of each: (1) the legal phoenix or business rescue; (2) the problematic phoenix; (3) illegal type 1 phoenix: intention to avoid debts formed as company starts to fail; (4) illegal type 2 phoenix: phoenix as a business model; and (5) complex illegal phoenix activity.The report also examines the role of professional advisors in facilitating illegal phoenix activity, the victims of illegal phoenix activity (including governments, unsecured trade creditors and employees) and two industries (the building and construction industry and the financial services industry) where illegal phoenix activity has been identified as a particular concern.\",\"PeriodicalId\":223837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Criminal Law (Public Law - Crime) (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Criminal Law (Public Law - Crime) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2536248\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Criminal Law (Public Law - Crime) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2536248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

凤凰活动发生在破产公司的业务转移到第二家(通常是新成立的)公司,而第二家公司的控制人与第一家公司的控制人相同的情况下。凤凰的活动可能是合法的,也可能是非法的。凤凰活动已经成为政府关注的一个重要问题,因为有很多人在推动非法凤凰活动,它造成了巨大的税收损失,并且认识到它对债权人和雇员的潜在破坏性影响。监管机构面临的一个关键问题是,难以确定特定的凤凰活动是否违法。这份报告(是一个更大的研究项目的一部分)概述了合法和非法凤凰活动的特点,以帮助监管机构制定教育、侦查和执法策略。报告考察了历史上对凤凰活动定义的各种尝试,然后确定了凤凰活动的以下五类,并提供了每个类别的例子:(1)法律凤凰或商业救援;(2)问题凤凰;(3)非法第一类凤凰:公司开始破产时形成的意图逃避债务;(4)凤凰违法类型2:以凤凰为经营模式;(5)复杂的非法凤凰活动。报告还探讨了专业顾问在促进非法凤凰活动方面的作用,非法凤凰活动的受害者(包括政府、无担保的贸易债权人和雇员)以及非法凤凰活动被确定为特别关注的两个行业(建筑和建筑业和金融服务业)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Defining and Profiling Phoenix Activity
Phoenix activity occurs where the business of a failed company is transferred to a second (typically newly incorporated) company and the second company’s controllers are the same as the first company’s controllers. Phoenix activity can be legal as well as illegal. Phoenix activity has become a significant concern for governments because of the number of individuals promoting illegal phoenix activity, the significant loss of tax revenue it causes, and the recognition of the potentially devastating impact it has on creditors and employees. A key problem faced by regulators is the difficulty associated with identifying whether particular phoenix activity is illegal or not. This report (which forms part of a larger research project) profiles the characteristics of both legal and illegal phoenix activity to assist regulators in formulating education, detection, and enforcement strategies. The report examines the various historical attempts to define phoenix activity and then identifies the following five categories of phoenix activity and provides examples of each: (1) the legal phoenix or business rescue; (2) the problematic phoenix; (3) illegal type 1 phoenix: intention to avoid debts formed as company starts to fail; (4) illegal type 2 phoenix: phoenix as a business model; and (5) complex illegal phoenix activity.The report also examines the role of professional advisors in facilitating illegal phoenix activity, the victims of illegal phoenix activity (including governments, unsecured trade creditors and employees) and two industries (the building and construction industry and the financial services industry) where illegal phoenix activity has been identified as a particular concern.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信