基于鲁棒和灵活漫游车操作的自动机载任务规划

T. Cunningham, D. Spencer
{"title":"基于鲁棒和灵活漫游车操作的自动机载任务规划","authors":"T. Cunningham, D. Spencer","doi":"10.1109/AERO53065.2022.9843729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Activity planning for space mission operations has traditionally been a human-in-the-loop effort, conducted by ground operators. The outputs of the mission planning process are scripted sequences of activities that are uplinked to the space vehicle for execution. Over the past two decades, advances have been made toward automating the mission planning process, in an effort to improve the efficiency of the mission operations system, while increasing the mission return. Some aspects of onboard mission planning are increasingly used for complex missions, particularly for planetary surface missions that are subject to long communication delays. This paper applies an automated mission planning framework to a resource-constrained science rover mission case study. The plans are optimized on the basis of science return, accommodating traverse to sites of scientific interest according to ground-team preferences, while staying within rover engineering and traverse-related constraints. Automated mission planners offer the capability to schedule engineering and science activities onboard, without ground-in-the-loop interaction. Resource modeling and path planning can be done onboard, reducing the need for modeling and validation by ground operators. Further, automated mission planners may incorporate an optimization executive that maximizes the mission return within the available resource constraints. The proposed planners may be utilized on the ground by mission planning teams to provide additional insight during the planning process, or onboard autonomous rovers with limited human support. Using optimization methods, the developed automated mission planner establishes the planned sequence of routes to be followed to sites of high scientific value while adhering to constraints imposed by pathing requirements and resource availability. The activity plans coordinate the traverse planning and science data acquisition within the context of the evolving knowledge of the scientific value of the nearby terrain. The automated mission planning framework is designed to be adapted based upon the application. Optimization methods suitable for different mission planning problems are presented, comparing methods on the basis of computation speed, resources required and solution optimality. Measures of “robustness” and “flexibility” are incorporated into the framework to enable the system to adapt to changing conditions without violating constraints, and to provide additional criteria with which to evaluate and compare the produced activity plans.","PeriodicalId":219988,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO)","volume":"132 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automated Onboard Mission Planning for Robust and Flexible Rover Operations\",\"authors\":\"T. Cunningham, D. Spencer\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AERO53065.2022.9843729\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Activity planning for space mission operations has traditionally been a human-in-the-loop effort, conducted by ground operators. The outputs of the mission planning process are scripted sequences of activities that are uplinked to the space vehicle for execution. Over the past two decades, advances have been made toward automating the mission planning process, in an effort to improve the efficiency of the mission operations system, while increasing the mission return. Some aspects of onboard mission planning are increasingly used for complex missions, particularly for planetary surface missions that are subject to long communication delays. This paper applies an automated mission planning framework to a resource-constrained science rover mission case study. The plans are optimized on the basis of science return, accommodating traverse to sites of scientific interest according to ground-team preferences, while staying within rover engineering and traverse-related constraints. Automated mission planners offer the capability to schedule engineering and science activities onboard, without ground-in-the-loop interaction. Resource modeling and path planning can be done onboard, reducing the need for modeling and validation by ground operators. Further, automated mission planners may incorporate an optimization executive that maximizes the mission return within the available resource constraints. The proposed planners may be utilized on the ground by mission planning teams to provide additional insight during the planning process, or onboard autonomous rovers with limited human support. Using optimization methods, the developed automated mission planner establishes the planned sequence of routes to be followed to sites of high scientific value while adhering to constraints imposed by pathing requirements and resource availability. The activity plans coordinate the traverse planning and science data acquisition within the context of the evolving knowledge of the scientific value of the nearby terrain. The automated mission planning framework is designed to be adapted based upon the application. Optimization methods suitable for different mission planning problems are presented, comparing methods on the basis of computation speed, resources required and solution optimality. Measures of “robustness” and “flexibility” are incorporated into the framework to enable the system to adapt to changing conditions without violating constraints, and to provide additional criteria with which to evaluate and compare the produced activity plans.\",\"PeriodicalId\":219988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO)\",\"volume\":\"132 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO53065.2022.9843729\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO53065.2022.9843729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

空间任务操作的活动规划传统上是由地面操作人员进行的“人在环”工作。任务规划过程的输出是活动的脚本序列,这些活动被连接到空间飞行器上执行。过去二十年来,在任务规划过程自动化方面取得了进展,努力提高任务业务系统的效率,同时增加任务回报。机载任务规划的某些方面越来越多地用于复杂的任务,特别是通信延迟时间长的行星表面任务。本文将自动化任务规划框架应用于资源受限的科学探测车任务案例研究。这些计划是在科学回报的基础上进行优化的,根据地面团队的偏好,在保持漫游车工程和穿越相关约束的同时,适应科学兴趣地点的穿越。自动化任务规划器提供了在没有地面环内交互的情况下安排机载工程和科学活动的能力。资源建模和路径规划可以在机载完成,减少了地面操作人员建模和验证的需要。此外,自动化任务规划者可能包含一个优化执行,在可用资源约束下使任务回报最大化。提议的规划人员可以在地面上由任务规划团队在规划过程中提供额外的见解,也可以在有限的人工支持下在自主漫游车上使用。利用优化方法,开发的自动化任务规划器在遵守路径要求和资源可用性约束的情况下,建立了到达高科学价值地点的规划路线序列。活动计划在不断发展的附近地形科学价值知识的背景下协调导线规划和科学数据采集。自动任务规划框架被设计为根据应用进行调整。提出了适用于不同任务规划问题的优化方法,并从计算速度、所需资源和解的最优性等方面进行了比较。“稳健性”和“灵活性”的措施被纳入框架,使系统能够适应不断变化的条件而不违反限制,并提供评价和比较已制定的活动计划的额外标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Automated Onboard Mission Planning for Robust and Flexible Rover Operations
Activity planning for space mission operations has traditionally been a human-in-the-loop effort, conducted by ground operators. The outputs of the mission planning process are scripted sequences of activities that are uplinked to the space vehicle for execution. Over the past two decades, advances have been made toward automating the mission planning process, in an effort to improve the efficiency of the mission operations system, while increasing the mission return. Some aspects of onboard mission planning are increasingly used for complex missions, particularly for planetary surface missions that are subject to long communication delays. This paper applies an automated mission planning framework to a resource-constrained science rover mission case study. The plans are optimized on the basis of science return, accommodating traverse to sites of scientific interest according to ground-team preferences, while staying within rover engineering and traverse-related constraints. Automated mission planners offer the capability to schedule engineering and science activities onboard, without ground-in-the-loop interaction. Resource modeling and path planning can be done onboard, reducing the need for modeling and validation by ground operators. Further, automated mission planners may incorporate an optimization executive that maximizes the mission return within the available resource constraints. The proposed planners may be utilized on the ground by mission planning teams to provide additional insight during the planning process, or onboard autonomous rovers with limited human support. Using optimization methods, the developed automated mission planner establishes the planned sequence of routes to be followed to sites of high scientific value while adhering to constraints imposed by pathing requirements and resource availability. The activity plans coordinate the traverse planning and science data acquisition within the context of the evolving knowledge of the scientific value of the nearby terrain. The automated mission planning framework is designed to be adapted based upon the application. Optimization methods suitable for different mission planning problems are presented, comparing methods on the basis of computation speed, resources required and solution optimality. Measures of “robustness” and “flexibility” are incorporated into the framework to enable the system to adapt to changing conditions without violating constraints, and to provide additional criteria with which to evaluate and compare the produced activity plans.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信