失代偿性心力衰竭住院患者不同时间点收缩压与出院后事件的预后关系

Younan Yao, Rong-cheng Zhang, T. An, Qi Zhang, Xinke Zhao, Jian Zhang
{"title":"失代偿性心力衰竭住院患者不同时间点收缩压与出院后事件的预后关系","authors":"Younan Yao, Rong-cheng Zhang, T. An, Qi Zhang, Xinke Zhao, Jian Zhang","doi":"10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.09.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The association of systolic blood pressure (SBP) with mortality in heart failure (HF) patients is paradoxical, and the time points of baseline SBP are also different across prior studies. We hypothesized that the levels of SBP at admission and at discharge had different associations with postdischarge events. Methods The study population included patients hospitalized for decompensated HF in the Heart Failure Center of Fuwai Hospital from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2014. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular (CV) death and heart transplantation. Multivariate Cox proportional-hazards and restricted cubic spline analyses were used to assess the relationships between SBP at different time points and outcomes. Results In total, 2005 patients were included with a median follow-up of 48.4 months. The median age was 59 years, and 69.9% were male. Multivariate Cox analyses showed that compared with SBP < 105 mmHg, higher SBP at admission was associated with better long-term primary outcome (105–119 mmHg, HR = 0.764, P = 0.005; 120–134 mmHg, HR = 0.658, P < 0.001; ≥ 135 mmHg, HR = 0.657, P = 0.001). Patients whose discharge SBP was higher than 135 mmHg had a similar primary outcome as those with SBP < 105 mmHg (HR = 0.969, P = 0.867), and the results remained unchanged even after adjusting for admission SBP (HR = 1.235, P = 0.291). The results of restricted cubic spline analysis indicated similar associations. Conclusions Lower but not higher SBP at admission is associated with more CV deaths/heart transplantations (a reverse J-shaped curve). In contrast, there is a U-shaped association between discharge SBP and CV mortality/heart transplantation.","PeriodicalId":285674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Different prognostic association of systolic blood pressure at different time points with postdischarge events in patients hospitalized for decompensated heart failure\",\"authors\":\"Younan Yao, Rong-cheng Zhang, T. An, Qi Zhang, Xinke Zhao, Jian Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.09.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background The association of systolic blood pressure (SBP) with mortality in heart failure (HF) patients is paradoxical, and the time points of baseline SBP are also different across prior studies. We hypothesized that the levels of SBP at admission and at discharge had different associations with postdischarge events. Methods The study population included patients hospitalized for decompensated HF in the Heart Failure Center of Fuwai Hospital from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2014. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular (CV) death and heart transplantation. Multivariate Cox proportional-hazards and restricted cubic spline analyses were used to assess the relationships between SBP at different time points and outcomes. Results In total, 2005 patients were included with a median follow-up of 48.4 months. The median age was 59 years, and 69.9% were male. Multivariate Cox analyses showed that compared with SBP < 105 mmHg, higher SBP at admission was associated with better long-term primary outcome (105–119 mmHg, HR = 0.764, P = 0.005; 120–134 mmHg, HR = 0.658, P < 0.001; ≥ 135 mmHg, HR = 0.657, P = 0.001). Patients whose discharge SBP was higher than 135 mmHg had a similar primary outcome as those with SBP < 105 mmHg (HR = 0.969, P = 0.867), and the results remained unchanged even after adjusting for admission SBP (HR = 1.235, P = 0.291). The results of restricted cubic spline analysis indicated similar associations. Conclusions Lower but not higher SBP at admission is associated with more CV deaths/heart transplantations (a reverse J-shaped curve). In contrast, there is a U-shaped association between discharge SBP and CV mortality/heart transplantation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":285674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC\",\"volume\":\"133 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.09.009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.09.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景收缩压(SBP)与心力衰竭(HF)患者死亡率的关系是矛盾的,并且在先前的研究中,基线收缩压的时间点也不同。我们假设入院和出院时收缩压水平与出院后事件有不同的关联。方法选取阜外医院心力衰竭中心2009年1月1日至2014年12月31日收治的失代偿性心衰患者作为研究对象。主要结局是心血管(CV)死亡和心脏移植的综合结局。采用多变量Cox比例风险分析和限制性三次样条分析来评估不同时间点收缩压与预后之间的关系。结果共纳入2005例患者,中位随访48.4个月。中位年龄为59岁,69.9%为男性。多因素Cox分析显示,与收缩压< 105 mmHg的患者相比,入院时收缩压较高与较好的长期主要预后相关(105 - 119 mmHg, HR = 0.764, P = 0.005;120 ~ 134 mmHg, HR = 0.658, P < 0.001;≥135 mmHg, HR = 0.657, P = 0.001)。出院时收缩压高于135 mmHg的患者与收缩压< 105 mmHg的患者的主要结局相似(HR = 0.969, P = 0.867),即使调整入院时收缩压,结果仍保持不变(HR = 1.235, P = 0.291)。限制三次样条分析的结果表明了类似的关联。结论入院时较低的收缩压与更多的心血管死亡/心脏移植相关(反向j型曲线)。相反,出院收缩压与心血管死亡率/心脏移植之间呈u型相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Different prognostic association of systolic blood pressure at different time points with postdischarge events in patients hospitalized for decompensated heart failure
Background The association of systolic blood pressure (SBP) with mortality in heart failure (HF) patients is paradoxical, and the time points of baseline SBP are also different across prior studies. We hypothesized that the levels of SBP at admission and at discharge had different associations with postdischarge events. Methods The study population included patients hospitalized for decompensated HF in the Heart Failure Center of Fuwai Hospital from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2014. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular (CV) death and heart transplantation. Multivariate Cox proportional-hazards and restricted cubic spline analyses were used to assess the relationships between SBP at different time points and outcomes. Results In total, 2005 patients were included with a median follow-up of 48.4 months. The median age was 59 years, and 69.9% were male. Multivariate Cox analyses showed that compared with SBP < 105 mmHg, higher SBP at admission was associated with better long-term primary outcome (105–119 mmHg, HR = 0.764, P = 0.005; 120–134 mmHg, HR = 0.658, P < 0.001; ≥ 135 mmHg, HR = 0.657, P = 0.001). Patients whose discharge SBP was higher than 135 mmHg had a similar primary outcome as those with SBP < 105 mmHg (HR = 0.969, P = 0.867), and the results remained unchanged even after adjusting for admission SBP (HR = 1.235, P = 0.291). The results of restricted cubic spline analysis indicated similar associations. Conclusions Lower but not higher SBP at admission is associated with more CV deaths/heart transplantations (a reverse J-shaped curve). In contrast, there is a U-shaped association between discharge SBP and CV mortality/heart transplantation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信