软件定义网络控制器在不同网络拓扑下的性能

Kamel Alrashedy, Ben Kimmett, T. Gulliver
{"title":"软件定义网络控制器在不同网络拓扑下的性能","authors":"Kamel Alrashedy, Ben Kimmett, T. Gulliver","doi":"10.1109/PACRIM.2017.8121925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the increasing complexity of networks, Software Defined Networks (SDNs) have been developed to help administrators configure and operate network services with controllers such as Beacon, OpenDaylight and Floodlight. These controllers provide a suitable platform for high bandwidth applications. In this paper, several SDN controllers are evaluated using different network topologies. Some controllers cannot operate on topologies containing loops such as Pox and Beacon. OpenDaylight can be used on topologies with loops, but does not provide any benefit for multiple paths, i.e. when there is more than one path for a packet to reach its destination. Floodlight is the most efficient and adaptable controller with topologies containing loops and multiple paths. The controllers are evaluated on Mininet using ping and iperf, and the initial packet latency and throughput for the topologies are compared.","PeriodicalId":308087,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE Pacific Rim Conference on Communications, Computers and Signal Processing (PACRIM)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of software-defined networking controllers for different network topologies\",\"authors\":\"Kamel Alrashedy, Ben Kimmett, T. Gulliver\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PACRIM.2017.8121925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the increasing complexity of networks, Software Defined Networks (SDNs) have been developed to help administrators configure and operate network services with controllers such as Beacon, OpenDaylight and Floodlight. These controllers provide a suitable platform for high bandwidth applications. In this paper, several SDN controllers are evaluated using different network topologies. Some controllers cannot operate on topologies containing loops such as Pox and Beacon. OpenDaylight can be used on topologies with loops, but does not provide any benefit for multiple paths, i.e. when there is more than one path for a packet to reach its destination. Floodlight is the most efficient and adaptable controller with topologies containing loops and multiple paths. The controllers are evaluated on Mininet using ping and iperf, and the initial packet latency and throughput for the topologies are compared.\",\"PeriodicalId\":308087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE Pacific Rim Conference on Communications, Computers and Signal Processing (PACRIM)\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE Pacific Rim Conference on Communications, Computers and Signal Processing (PACRIM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PACRIM.2017.8121925\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE Pacific Rim Conference on Communications, Computers and Signal Processing (PACRIM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PACRIM.2017.8121925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

随着网络的日益复杂,软件定义网络(sdn)已经被开发出来,以帮助管理员通过Beacon、OpenDaylight和Floodlight等控制器配置和操作网络服务。这些控制器为高带宽应用提供了合适的平台。在本文中,使用不同的网络拓扑对几个SDN控制器进行了评估。有些控制器不能在包含Pox和Beacon等循环的拓扑上操作。OpenDaylight可以用在有环路的拓扑结构上,但是对于多路径没有任何好处,也就是说,当一个数据包到达目的地有多条路径时。泛光灯是最有效和适应性强的控制器,其拓扑结构包含环路和多路径。在Mininet上使用ping和iperf对控制器进行评估,并比较了拓扑的初始数据包延迟和吞吐量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance of software-defined networking controllers for different network topologies
With the increasing complexity of networks, Software Defined Networks (SDNs) have been developed to help administrators configure and operate network services with controllers such as Beacon, OpenDaylight and Floodlight. These controllers provide a suitable platform for high bandwidth applications. In this paper, several SDN controllers are evaluated using different network topologies. Some controllers cannot operate on topologies containing loops such as Pox and Beacon. OpenDaylight can be used on topologies with loops, but does not provide any benefit for multiple paths, i.e. when there is more than one path for a packet to reach its destination. Floodlight is the most efficient and adaptable controller with topologies containing loops and multiple paths. The controllers are evaluated on Mininet using ping and iperf, and the initial packet latency and throughput for the topologies are compared.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信