机器学习产品关键性能指标与模型评估的一致性

Ioannis Bakagiannis, V. Gerogiannis, George Kakarontzas, A. Karageorgos
{"title":"机器学习产品关键性能指标与模型评估的一致性","authors":"Ioannis Bakagiannis, V. Gerogiannis, George Kakarontzas, A. Karageorgos","doi":"10.1109/CTISC52352.2021.00039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Machine Learning has seen amazing progress the past years with increasing commercial use from industries across the business spectrum. Businesses strive for alignment of vision and mission statement to the actual products they sell. For that reason tools like the Key Performance Indicators exist in order to monitor such progress. Nevertheless, products that embed a machine learning component are being optimized with other objective functions and are being evaluated in a vacuum with specific performance evaluation metrics that often have nothing to do with the business vision. In this position paper, we highlight this gap in different instances of the machine learning life cycle, explore and critically evaluate the current available solutions in the literature and introduce Key Performance Indicators in the machine learning development process. The paper also discusses representative machine learning KPIs in the development and deployment process.","PeriodicalId":268378,"journal":{"name":"2021 3rd International Conference on Advances in Computer Technology, Information Science and Communication (CTISC)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning product key performance indicators and alignment to model evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Ioannis Bakagiannis, V. Gerogiannis, George Kakarontzas, A. Karageorgos\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CTISC52352.2021.00039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Machine Learning has seen amazing progress the past years with increasing commercial use from industries across the business spectrum. Businesses strive for alignment of vision and mission statement to the actual products they sell. For that reason tools like the Key Performance Indicators exist in order to monitor such progress. Nevertheless, products that embed a machine learning component are being optimized with other objective functions and are being evaluated in a vacuum with specific performance evaluation metrics that often have nothing to do with the business vision. In this position paper, we highlight this gap in different instances of the machine learning life cycle, explore and critically evaluate the current available solutions in the literature and introduce Key Performance Indicators in the machine learning development process. The paper also discusses representative machine learning KPIs in the development and deployment process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":268378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 3rd International Conference on Advances in Computer Technology, Information Science and Communication (CTISC)\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 3rd International Conference on Advances in Computer Technology, Information Science and Communication (CTISC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CTISC52352.2021.00039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 3rd International Conference on Advances in Computer Technology, Information Science and Communication (CTISC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CTISC52352.2021.00039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机器学习在过去几年里取得了惊人的进步,在各个行业的商业应用越来越多。企业努力将愿景和使命声明与他们销售的实际产品保持一致。因此,存在诸如关键绩效指标之类的工具来监测这种进展。然而,嵌入机器学习组件的产品正在使用其他目标功能进行优化,并且在真空中使用特定的性能评估指标进行评估,这些指标通常与业务愿景无关。在这篇立场文件中,我们强调了机器学习生命周期的不同实例中的这一差距,探索和批判性地评估了文献中当前可用的解决方案,并介绍了机器学习开发过程中的关键绩效指标。本文还讨论了开发和部署过程中具有代表性的机器学习kpi。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Machine learning product key performance indicators and alignment to model evaluation
Machine Learning has seen amazing progress the past years with increasing commercial use from industries across the business spectrum. Businesses strive for alignment of vision and mission statement to the actual products they sell. For that reason tools like the Key Performance Indicators exist in order to monitor such progress. Nevertheless, products that embed a machine learning component are being optimized with other objective functions and are being evaluated in a vacuum with specific performance evaluation metrics that often have nothing to do with the business vision. In this position paper, we highlight this gap in different instances of the machine learning life cycle, explore and critically evaluate the current available solutions in the literature and introduce Key Performance Indicators in the machine learning development process. The paper also discusses representative machine learning KPIs in the development and deployment process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信