Operating Cash Flow and Earnings Under IFRS/GAAP: Evidence from Australia, France & UK

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the difference in the value relevance of operating cash flow and earnings in stock price before and after the mandatory IFRS adoption. The study basically uses Feltham and Ohlson (1995), Joos (1997) and other related studies valuation model. Using a sample of firms from 3 IFRS countries from 2003 to 2012, we find that operating cash flows seem to be more value relevance than earnings within and across country border after a switch to IFRS in Australia and the UK, and earnings seem to be more value relevance than operating cash flows in France. Additionally, Operating cash flow and earnings convey incremental explanatory power to explain share prices in Australia, France and the UK. After a switch to IFRS in 2005, our study shows that the difference in account number (operating cash flows and earnings) reduces across country border but increases within country when both the IFRS and local accounting standards are used. Taken together, our findings suggests that after a swift to the mandatory IFRS adoption, even though income statement and the statement of cash flow are very vital for strategic decisions, investors in Australia and UK are more likely to pay more value relevance to the statement of cash flow than income statement whereas in France, income state is more required than statement of cash flow.