正转与反转涡轮叶片框架的数值研究

Nicolas Krajnc, F. Merli, Asim Hafizovic, A. Peters, E. Göttlich
{"title":"正转与反转涡轮叶片框架的数值研究","authors":"Nicolas Krajnc, F. Merli, Asim Hafizovic, A. Peters, E. Göttlich","doi":"10.1115/gt2022-81083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper presents the numerical comparison of a turbine vane frame (TVF) for future high-bypass turbofan engines for architectures with a co-rotating setup between the high-pressure turbine (HPT) and the low-pressure turbine (LPT) and with a counter-rotating setup. The flow field in the TVF is impacted by the decision of a co- or counter-rotating architecture which is driven not only by aerodynamics but also by the dynamic and mechanical design constraints in an engine.\n As boundary conditions for the steady RANS simulation, measurements are used which were carried out in the engine-representative two-spool rig at the Institute for Thermal Turbomachinery and Machine Dynamics at the Graz University of Technology. The test vehicle in this rig consists of an HPT with nearly axial exit flow and a counter-rotating LPT connected via the TVF with aft-loaded struts and splitters. To reproduce a realistic HPT flow field, purge air is provided by a secondary air system (SAS). The inlet and outlet boundary conditions are defined based on the five-hole probe (5HP) measurement set up- and downstream of the TVF, acquired for three different purge conditions (0%, 100% = nominal, and 200%).\n To simulate a co-rotating configuration, the measured inlet flow field has been mirrored. The focus of this paper is to gain additional insights into the general flow behavior of a TVF in a co- and counter-rotating configuration, respectively. A special focus is placed on the differences between the development of strut secondary flows on their way through the TVF depending on the inlet flow field. Additionally, a duct loss comparison of the two configurations and its sensitivity to different purge flow levels is presented.","PeriodicalId":191970,"journal":{"name":"Volume 10C: Turbomachinery — Design Methods and CFD Modeling for Turbomachinery; Ducts, Noise, and Component Interactions","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical Investigation of a Turbine Vane Frame for Co- and Counter-Rotating Configuration\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas Krajnc, F. Merli, Asim Hafizovic, A. Peters, E. Göttlich\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/gt2022-81083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper presents the numerical comparison of a turbine vane frame (TVF) for future high-bypass turbofan engines for architectures with a co-rotating setup between the high-pressure turbine (HPT) and the low-pressure turbine (LPT) and with a counter-rotating setup. The flow field in the TVF is impacted by the decision of a co- or counter-rotating architecture which is driven not only by aerodynamics but also by the dynamic and mechanical design constraints in an engine.\\n As boundary conditions for the steady RANS simulation, measurements are used which were carried out in the engine-representative two-spool rig at the Institute for Thermal Turbomachinery and Machine Dynamics at the Graz University of Technology. The test vehicle in this rig consists of an HPT with nearly axial exit flow and a counter-rotating LPT connected via the TVF with aft-loaded struts and splitters. To reproduce a realistic HPT flow field, purge air is provided by a secondary air system (SAS). The inlet and outlet boundary conditions are defined based on the five-hole probe (5HP) measurement set up- and downstream of the TVF, acquired for three different purge conditions (0%, 100% = nominal, and 200%).\\n To simulate a co-rotating configuration, the measured inlet flow field has been mirrored. The focus of this paper is to gain additional insights into the general flow behavior of a TVF in a co- and counter-rotating configuration, respectively. A special focus is placed on the differences between the development of strut secondary flows on their way through the TVF depending on the inlet flow field. Additionally, a duct loss comparison of the two configurations and its sensitivity to different purge flow levels is presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":191970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 10C: Turbomachinery — Design Methods and CFD Modeling for Turbomachinery; Ducts, Noise, and Component Interactions\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 10C: Turbomachinery — Design Methods and CFD Modeling for Turbomachinery; Ducts, Noise, and Component Interactions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2022-81083\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 10C: Turbomachinery — Design Methods and CFD Modeling for Turbomachinery; Ducts, Noise, and Component Interactions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2022-81083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对高压涡轮(HPT)与低压涡轮(LPT)同向旋转和反向旋转结构下的未来大涵道比涡扇发动机的涡轮叶片框架(TVF)进行了数值比较。涡轮换能器内的流场不仅受到空气动力学的影响,还受到发动机动力和机械设计约束的影响。作为稳态RANS模拟的边界条件,测量结果是在格拉茨工业大学热涡轮机械与机械动力学研究所的发动机代表性双轴钻机上进行的。该钻井平台的测试车辆包括一个具有近轴向出口流的HPT和一个反向旋转的LPT,通过带有后加载支柱和分离器的TVF连接。为了重现真实的高温高压流场,吹扫空气由二次空气系统(SAS)提供。进口和出口边界条件是根据五孔探头(5HP)测量装置和TVF下游,获得三种不同的吹扫条件(0%,100% =标称和200%)来定义的。为了模拟同向旋转结构,测量的入口流场被镜像。本文的重点是获得额外的见解,一般流动行为的TVF在共旋转和反向旋转构型,分别。特别关注的是通过TVF的支板二次流的发展差异,这取决于进口流场。此外,还比较了两种结构的管道损失及其对不同吹扫流量的敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Numerical Investigation of a Turbine Vane Frame for Co- and Counter-Rotating Configuration
This paper presents the numerical comparison of a turbine vane frame (TVF) for future high-bypass turbofan engines for architectures with a co-rotating setup between the high-pressure turbine (HPT) and the low-pressure turbine (LPT) and with a counter-rotating setup. The flow field in the TVF is impacted by the decision of a co- or counter-rotating architecture which is driven not only by aerodynamics but also by the dynamic and mechanical design constraints in an engine. As boundary conditions for the steady RANS simulation, measurements are used which were carried out in the engine-representative two-spool rig at the Institute for Thermal Turbomachinery and Machine Dynamics at the Graz University of Technology. The test vehicle in this rig consists of an HPT with nearly axial exit flow and a counter-rotating LPT connected via the TVF with aft-loaded struts and splitters. To reproduce a realistic HPT flow field, purge air is provided by a secondary air system (SAS). The inlet and outlet boundary conditions are defined based on the five-hole probe (5HP) measurement set up- and downstream of the TVF, acquired for three different purge conditions (0%, 100% = nominal, and 200%). To simulate a co-rotating configuration, the measured inlet flow field has been mirrored. The focus of this paper is to gain additional insights into the general flow behavior of a TVF in a co- and counter-rotating configuration, respectively. A special focus is placed on the differences between the development of strut secondary flows on their way through the TVF depending on the inlet flow field. Additionally, a duct loss comparison of the two configurations and its sensitivity to different purge flow levels is presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信