基于神经网络的文本独立离线写作者识别

D. A. Valkaniotis, J. Sirigos, N. Fakotakis, G. Kokkinakis
{"title":"基于神经网络的文本独立离线写作者识别","authors":"D. A. Valkaniotis, J. Sirigos, N. Fakotakis, G. Kokkinakis","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.36306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we present a text-independent offline writer recognition system based on multilayer perceptrons (MLPs). The system can be used for both identification and verification purposes. It was tested on a population of 20 writers with non-correlated training and test specimens. The mean error for identification was 3.5% while error rates as low as 0.5% were achieved on specimens with more than 25 characters. For verification the mean error was 1.2% (2.22% false rejection, 0.18% false acceptance) considering a minimum of 15 characters per test specimen. These error rates are comparable to those achieved by classical methods while the response of the system is substantially faster.","PeriodicalId":282153,"journal":{"name":"1996 8th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO 1996)","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Text-independent off-line writer recognition using neural networks\",\"authors\":\"D. A. Valkaniotis, J. Sirigos, N. Fakotakis, G. Kokkinakis\",\"doi\":\"10.5281/ZENODO.36306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we present a text-independent offline writer recognition system based on multilayer perceptrons (MLPs). The system can be used for both identification and verification purposes. It was tested on a population of 20 writers with non-correlated training and test specimens. The mean error for identification was 3.5% while error rates as low as 0.5% were achieved on specimens with more than 25 characters. For verification the mean error was 1.2% (2.22% false rejection, 0.18% false acceptance) considering a minimum of 15 characters per test specimen. These error rates are comparable to those achieved by classical methods while the response of the system is substantially faster.\",\"PeriodicalId\":282153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"1996 8th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO 1996)\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"1996 8th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO 1996)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.36306\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1996 8th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO 1996)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.36306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文提出了一种基于多层感知器(mlp)的与文本无关的离线作家识别系统。该系统可用于识别和核查目的。它在20位作家身上进行了测试,这些作家的训练和测试样本不相关。鉴定的平均误差为3.5%,而对大于25个字符的标本的误差率低至0.5%。为了验证,考虑到每个测试样本至少15个字符,平均误差为1.2%(2.22%错误拒绝,0.18%错误接受)。这些错误率与传统方法的错误率相当,而系统的响应速度要快得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Text-independent off-line writer recognition using neural networks
In this paper we present a text-independent offline writer recognition system based on multilayer perceptrons (MLPs). The system can be used for both identification and verification purposes. It was tested on a population of 20 writers with non-correlated training and test specimens. The mean error for identification was 3.5% while error rates as low as 0.5% were achieved on specimens with more than 25 characters. For verification the mean error was 1.2% (2.22% false rejection, 0.18% false acceptance) considering a minimum of 15 characters per test specimen. These error rates are comparable to those achieved by classical methods while the response of the system is substantially faster.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信