道德和植入前诊断:一个在瑞士的讨论

C. Rehmann-Sutter
{"title":"道德和植入前诊断:一个在瑞士的讨论","authors":"C. Rehmann-Sutter","doi":"10.24894/bf.2008.01018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ethics and preimplantation diagnosis: a contribution to discussions in Switzerland The concept of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) was conceived not just following a technological logic of feasiblity, but also for moral reasons. Compared to the termination of a pregnancy after prenatal diagnosis, PGD with selective embryo transfer is a lesser burden and in this sense it has ethical advantages. Two concrete cases highlight partly unexpected circumstances arising in practice, and underline how diverse our moral perceptions of PGD can be. Single cases cannot ground general normative solutions; nevertheless, they can point to moral contradictions in existing governance. This article argues that a ban of PGD on grounds of embryo protection and avoidance of eugenics is not an equitable answer to the needs and interests of those involved. This result is in line with reflections of the Swiss National Advisory Commission on Biomedical Ethics, whose opinions of 2005 and 2007 are summarized.","PeriodicalId":263926,"journal":{"name":"Bioethica Forum","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethik und Präimplantationsdiagnostik: Ein Beitrag zur Diskussion in der Schweiz\",\"authors\":\"C. Rehmann-Sutter\",\"doi\":\"10.24894/bf.2008.01018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ethics and preimplantation diagnosis: a contribution to discussions in Switzerland The concept of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) was conceived not just following a technological logic of feasiblity, but also for moral reasons. Compared to the termination of a pregnancy after prenatal diagnosis, PGD with selective embryo transfer is a lesser burden and in this sense it has ethical advantages. Two concrete cases highlight partly unexpected circumstances arising in practice, and underline how diverse our moral perceptions of PGD can be. Single cases cannot ground general normative solutions; nevertheless, they can point to moral contradictions in existing governance. This article argues that a ban of PGD on grounds of embryo protection and avoidance of eugenics is not an equitable answer to the needs and interests of those involved. This result is in line with reflections of the Swiss National Advisory Commission on Biomedical Ethics, whose opinions of 2005 and 2007 are summarized.\",\"PeriodicalId\":263926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioethica Forum\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioethica Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24894/bf.2008.01018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioethica Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24894/bf.2008.01018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

胚胎植入前遗传学诊断(PGD)的概念不仅遵循可行性的技术逻辑,而且出于道德原因。与产前诊断后终止妊娠相比,PGD与选择性胚胎移植的负担较小,从这个意义上讲,它具有伦理优势。两个具体的案例突出了实践中出现的部分意想不到的情况,并强调了我们对PGD的道德观念是多么的多样化。单一案例不能作为一般规范解决方案的基础;然而,他们可以指出现有治理中的道德矛盾。本文认为,以保护胚胎和避免优生学为由禁止PGD不是对相关人员需求和利益的公平回答。这一结果与瑞士国家生物医学伦理咨询委员会的反映一致,总结了其2005年和2007年的意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethik und Präimplantationsdiagnostik: Ein Beitrag zur Diskussion in der Schweiz
Ethics and preimplantation diagnosis: a contribution to discussions in Switzerland The concept of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) was conceived not just following a technological logic of feasiblity, but also for moral reasons. Compared to the termination of a pregnancy after prenatal diagnosis, PGD with selective embryo transfer is a lesser burden and in this sense it has ethical advantages. Two concrete cases highlight partly unexpected circumstances arising in practice, and underline how diverse our moral perceptions of PGD can be. Single cases cannot ground general normative solutions; nevertheless, they can point to moral contradictions in existing governance. This article argues that a ban of PGD on grounds of embryo protection and avoidance of eugenics is not an equitable answer to the needs and interests of those involved. This result is in line with reflections of the Swiss National Advisory Commission on Biomedical Ethics, whose opinions of 2005 and 2007 are summarized.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信