评分、纠错反馈和纠错反馈加语法准确性评分的有效性

Arash Hashemifardnia, Ehsan Namaziandost, M. Sepehri
{"title":"评分、纠错反馈和纠错反馈加语法准确性评分的有效性","authors":"Arash Hashemifardnia, Ehsan Namaziandost, M. Sepehri","doi":"10.5861/IJRSLL.2019.3012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study compared the effects of giving grade, corrective feedback (CF), and CF-plus-giving grade on Iranian pre-intermediate EFL students’ learning simple past and simple present tenses. To fulfil this objective, 84 Iranian participants were selected among 80 students based on the results of Oxford Quick Placement Test (OQPT). The selected pre-intermediate participants were then randomly divided into three equal experimental groups; CF-only group (n=28), grade-only group (n=28), and CF-plus-grade group (n=28). Afterwards, the researchers measured the participants’ English grammar knowledge by administering a grammar pre-test including 20 items related to simple past and simple present tenses. After pre-testing, the researchers taught simple present tense to the participants of all groups explicitly. After teaching all points of simple present tense, the researchers gave some homework related to simple present tense to the participants to do at home. In the following session, the researchers checked the participants’ homework and gave grade to one group; gave both written and oral CFs to the other group, and gave grades in addition to the CFs to the third group. In the next session, the researchers taught simple past tense to the participants of all groups explicitly. When they taught all related points of simple past tense, they gave some assignments related to simple past tense to the participants to do at home. In the next session, the researchers corrected the participants’ homework through giving grade, written and oral CFs, giving grades in addition to the CFs. Finally, a post-test of grammar including 20 objective items related to simple present and simple past tenses was administered to the participants to measure the effects of the treatment on their grammar improvement. The results of One-Way ANOVA and paired-samples t-tests indicated that all experimental groups improved on their post-tests but the CF-plus-grade group had better performance than the other two groups on the post-test. The implications of this study may encourage teachers to use both grades and CFs in the EFL classrooms to correct the EFL learners’ grammatical mistakes.","PeriodicalId":173713,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogy eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"36","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effectiveness of Giving Grade, Corrective Feedback, and Corrective Feedback-Plus-Giving Grade on Grammatical Accuracy\",\"authors\":\"Arash Hashemifardnia, Ehsan Namaziandost, M. Sepehri\",\"doi\":\"10.5861/IJRSLL.2019.3012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study compared the effects of giving grade, corrective feedback (CF), and CF-plus-giving grade on Iranian pre-intermediate EFL students’ learning simple past and simple present tenses. To fulfil this objective, 84 Iranian participants were selected among 80 students based on the results of Oxford Quick Placement Test (OQPT). The selected pre-intermediate participants were then randomly divided into three equal experimental groups; CF-only group (n=28), grade-only group (n=28), and CF-plus-grade group (n=28). Afterwards, the researchers measured the participants’ English grammar knowledge by administering a grammar pre-test including 20 items related to simple past and simple present tenses. After pre-testing, the researchers taught simple present tense to the participants of all groups explicitly. After teaching all points of simple present tense, the researchers gave some homework related to simple present tense to the participants to do at home. In the following session, the researchers checked the participants’ homework and gave grade to one group; gave both written and oral CFs to the other group, and gave grades in addition to the CFs to the third group. In the next session, the researchers taught simple past tense to the participants of all groups explicitly. When they taught all related points of simple past tense, they gave some assignments related to simple past tense to the participants to do at home. In the next session, the researchers corrected the participants’ homework through giving grade, written and oral CFs, giving grades in addition to the CFs. Finally, a post-test of grammar including 20 objective items related to simple present and simple past tenses was administered to the participants to measure the effects of the treatment on their grammar improvement. The results of One-Way ANOVA and paired-samples t-tests indicated that all experimental groups improved on their post-tests but the CF-plus-grade group had better performance than the other two groups on the post-test. The implications of this study may encourage teachers to use both grades and CFs in the EFL classrooms to correct the EFL learners’ grammatical mistakes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":173713,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pedagogy eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"36\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pedagogy eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5861/IJRSLL.2019.3012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5861/IJRSLL.2019.3012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

摘要

本研究比较了评分、纠正反馈和纠正反馈加评分对伊朗中级前英语学生学习一般过去时和一般现在时的影响。为了实现这一目标,根据牛津快速分班考试(OQPT)的结果,从80名学生中选出84名伊朗参与者。将选取的中级前参与者随机分为三个实验组;单纯cf组(n=28)、单纯grade组(n=28)、cf + grade组(n=28)。之后,研究人员通过进行包括20个与一般过去时和一般现在时相关的语法预测试来测量参与者的英语语法知识。在预测后,研究人员明确地向所有组的参与者教授简单现在时。在讲授完一般现在时的所有知识点后,研究人员给被试布置了一些与一般现在时相关的家庭作业,让他们在家完成。在接下来的一段时间里,研究人员检查了参与者的家庭作业,并给一组打分;对另一组进行书面和口头的CFs评分,并在CFs评分的基础上对第三组进行评分。在下一个阶段,研究人员明确地向所有组的参与者教授一般过去时。在教授完一般过去时的相关知识点后,他们给参与者布置了一些与一般过去时相关的作业,让他们在家完成。在下一个阶段,研究人员通过给出分数、书面和口头的CFs来纠正参与者的家庭作业,并在CFs之外给出分数。最后,对被试进行语法后测,包括20个与一般现在时和一般过去时有关的客观项目,以衡量治疗对他们语法改善的效果。单因素方差分析(One-Way ANOVA)和配对样本t检验的结果表明,所有实验组的后验成绩均有提高,但cf + grade组的后验成绩优于其他两组。本研究的启示可能鼓励教师在英语课堂上同时使用分数和语法错误来纠正英语学习者的语法错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effectiveness of Giving Grade, Corrective Feedback, and Corrective Feedback-Plus-Giving Grade on Grammatical Accuracy
This study compared the effects of giving grade, corrective feedback (CF), and CF-plus-giving grade on Iranian pre-intermediate EFL students’ learning simple past and simple present tenses. To fulfil this objective, 84 Iranian participants were selected among 80 students based on the results of Oxford Quick Placement Test (OQPT). The selected pre-intermediate participants were then randomly divided into three equal experimental groups; CF-only group (n=28), grade-only group (n=28), and CF-plus-grade group (n=28). Afterwards, the researchers measured the participants’ English grammar knowledge by administering a grammar pre-test including 20 items related to simple past and simple present tenses. After pre-testing, the researchers taught simple present tense to the participants of all groups explicitly. After teaching all points of simple present tense, the researchers gave some homework related to simple present tense to the participants to do at home. In the following session, the researchers checked the participants’ homework and gave grade to one group; gave both written and oral CFs to the other group, and gave grades in addition to the CFs to the third group. In the next session, the researchers taught simple past tense to the participants of all groups explicitly. When they taught all related points of simple past tense, they gave some assignments related to simple past tense to the participants to do at home. In the next session, the researchers corrected the participants’ homework through giving grade, written and oral CFs, giving grades in addition to the CFs. Finally, a post-test of grammar including 20 objective items related to simple present and simple past tenses was administered to the participants to measure the effects of the treatment on their grammar improvement. The results of One-Way ANOVA and paired-samples t-tests indicated that all experimental groups improved on their post-tests but the CF-plus-grade group had better performance than the other two groups on the post-test. The implications of this study may encourage teachers to use both grades and CFs in the EFL classrooms to correct the EFL learners’ grammatical mistakes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信