根据《约旦民事诉讼法》提出重审上诉的程序欺诈

Basel M Nawaiseh, Haneen Abo Greganah
{"title":"根据《约旦民事诉讼法》提出重审上诉的程序欺诈","authors":"Basel M Nawaiseh, Haneen Abo Greganah","doi":"10.35682/jjlps.v15i1.406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The idea of ​​fraud is considered to have ethical dimensions that find its applications in a wide range of branches of law, both public and private, without exception. Its range is extended to the Civil Procedure Code, which is the common law for all other procedural laws. These procedural laws vary between judicial and non-judicial; Therefore, they must be protected from the fraud and manipulation of the opponents, which are usually aimed at prolonging the litigation period, depriving rights holders of their rights, or misleading justice for an unlawful purpose, which affects the proper course of justice.\nWe have concluded that the possibility of applying the principle of cheating spoils everything on the rules of procedure. Especially, since this principle is one of the universal and stable legal principles without stipulating it in the law, as it is a principle linked to the public order. In addition, the methods of cheating are not limited to the illegal behavior of the opponent but extend to include the concealment and lying of the opponent. Therefore, it is necessary for the legislator to intervene to regulate the rules of fraud in the procedures with explicit texts and not to leave them to the general rules.\n ","PeriodicalId":270369,"journal":{"name":"Jordanian Journal of Law and Political Science","volume":"412 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The procedural fraud that justifies the appeal for a retrial according to the Jordanian Civil Procedure Code\",\"authors\":\"Basel M Nawaiseh, Haneen Abo Greganah\",\"doi\":\"10.35682/jjlps.v15i1.406\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The idea of ​​fraud is considered to have ethical dimensions that find its applications in a wide range of branches of law, both public and private, without exception. Its range is extended to the Civil Procedure Code, which is the common law for all other procedural laws. These procedural laws vary between judicial and non-judicial; Therefore, they must be protected from the fraud and manipulation of the opponents, which are usually aimed at prolonging the litigation period, depriving rights holders of their rights, or misleading justice for an unlawful purpose, which affects the proper course of justice.\\nWe have concluded that the possibility of applying the principle of cheating spoils everything on the rules of procedure. Especially, since this principle is one of the universal and stable legal principles without stipulating it in the law, as it is a principle linked to the public order. In addition, the methods of cheating are not limited to the illegal behavior of the opponent but extend to include the concealment and lying of the opponent. Therefore, it is necessary for the legislator to intervene to regulate the rules of fraud in the procedures with explicit texts and not to leave them to the general rules.\\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":270369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jordanian Journal of Law and Political Science\",\"volume\":\"412 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jordanian Journal of Law and Political Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35682/jjlps.v15i1.406\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jordanian Journal of Law and Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35682/jjlps.v15i1.406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欺诈的概念被认为具有道德层面,在公共和私人法律的广泛分支中都有其应用,无一例外。它的适用范围扩展到《民事诉讼法》,它是所有其他程序法的普通法。这些程序法在司法和非司法之间有所不同;因此,必须保护他们免受对手的欺诈和操纵,这些欺诈和操纵通常旨在延长诉讼期限,剥夺权利持有人的权利,或为非法目的误导司法,从而影响司法的正常进行。我们的结论是,适用作弊原则的可能性破坏了程序规则的一切。特别是,由于这一原则是普遍和稳定的法律原则之一,而没有在法律中规定,因为它是与公共秩序联系在一起的原则。此外,作弊的方法不仅限于对手的违法行为,还扩大到包括对手的隐瞒和撒谎。因此,有必要由立法者介入,以明确的文本规范程序中的欺诈规则,而不是将其留给一般规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The procedural fraud that justifies the appeal for a retrial according to the Jordanian Civil Procedure Code
The idea of ​​fraud is considered to have ethical dimensions that find its applications in a wide range of branches of law, both public and private, without exception. Its range is extended to the Civil Procedure Code, which is the common law for all other procedural laws. These procedural laws vary between judicial and non-judicial; Therefore, they must be protected from the fraud and manipulation of the opponents, which are usually aimed at prolonging the litigation period, depriving rights holders of their rights, or misleading justice for an unlawful purpose, which affects the proper course of justice. We have concluded that the possibility of applying the principle of cheating spoils everything on the rules of procedure. Especially, since this principle is one of the universal and stable legal principles without stipulating it in the law, as it is a principle linked to the public order. In addition, the methods of cheating are not limited to the illegal behavior of the opponent but extend to include the concealment and lying of the opponent. Therefore, it is necessary for the legislator to intervene to regulate the rules of fraud in the procedures with explicit texts and not to leave them to the general rules.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信