阶跃多频互补相位码雷达中基于超分辨率和阻塞矩阵的角度估计

M. Akita, T. Inaba
{"title":"阶跃多频互补相位码雷达中基于超分辨率和阻塞矩阵的角度估计","authors":"M. Akita, T. Inaba","doi":"10.1109/RADAR.2018.8378709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, two angle estimation methods for applying the stepped multiple frequency CPC radar are considered. One is 2-D Super Resolution (2-D SR) (Method I) and the other is the combination of 1-D SR and Blocking Matrix method (BM) plus monopulse angle estimation (Method II). From the simulation results, the range and angle are obtained by both methods even in the situation where the targets have same velocity and located on the very close range and angle each other. RMSEs of Method I for both range and angle are smaller than those of Method II. On the other hand, both random and bias errors of Method II are smaller than those of Method I in the experiments. The results indicated that Method II has a tolerance to the calibration errors that exists in the actual measurements.","PeriodicalId":379567,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf18)","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Angle estimation using super resolution and blocking matrix in stepped multiple frequency complementary phase code radar\",\"authors\":\"M. Akita, T. Inaba\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RADAR.2018.8378709\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, two angle estimation methods for applying the stepped multiple frequency CPC radar are considered. One is 2-D Super Resolution (2-D SR) (Method I) and the other is the combination of 1-D SR and Blocking Matrix method (BM) plus monopulse angle estimation (Method II). From the simulation results, the range and angle are obtained by both methods even in the situation where the targets have same velocity and located on the very close range and angle each other. RMSEs of Method I for both range and angle are smaller than those of Method II. On the other hand, both random and bias errors of Method II are smaller than those of Method I in the experiments. The results indicated that Method II has a tolerance to the calibration errors that exists in the actual measurements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":379567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf18)\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf18)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RADAR.2018.8378709\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf18)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RADAR.2018.8378709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考虑了两种应用于阶跃多频CPC雷达的角度估计方法。一种是二维超分辨率(2-D SR)方法(方法一),另一种是一维超分辨率与块矩阵法(BM)结合,再加上单脉冲角度估计(方法二)。从仿真结果来看,即使在目标速度相同、距离和角度都很近的情况下,两种方法都能得到距离和角度。方法1的范围和角度均小于方法2的均方根误差。另一方面,在实验中,方法II的随机误差和偏差都比方法I的小。结果表明,方法二对实际测量中存在的标定误差有一定的容忍度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Angle estimation using super resolution and blocking matrix in stepped multiple frequency complementary phase code radar
In this paper, two angle estimation methods for applying the stepped multiple frequency CPC radar are considered. One is 2-D Super Resolution (2-D SR) (Method I) and the other is the combination of 1-D SR and Blocking Matrix method (BM) plus monopulse angle estimation (Method II). From the simulation results, the range and angle are obtained by both methods even in the situation where the targets have same velocity and located on the very close range and angle each other. RMSEs of Method I for both range and angle are smaller than those of Method II. On the other hand, both random and bias errors of Method II are smaller than those of Method I in the experiments. The results indicated that Method II has a tolerance to the calibration errors that exists in the actual measurements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信