{"title":"国际仲裁","authors":"Horatia Muir Watt","doi":"10.1093/law/9780198796190.003.0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter discusses international arbitration as a crucial part of the\n legal framework that has progressively enabled the contemporary\n neo-liberal orientation of global governance. As such, it presents the\n perspective of critical private international law. If the latter\n discipline constitutes a significant viewpoint in this respect, it is\n precisely because it provided the foundational legal tools and discourse\n by means of which international arbitration attained such astounding\n success as a cornerstone of cross-border trade and investment regimes.\n The specific contention here is that in sanctifying freedom of contract\n to an unprecedented degree, including unrestricted party choice of law\n and forum, it has deactivated the regulatory constraints to which\n private actors are subject in a domestic setting and, involuntarily\n thereby, sealed the ‘loss of control’ by nation-states of various\n crucial aspects of the global economy. The chapter then explores the\n grievances generally addressed to arbitration as emblematic of the\n privatization of global governance, understood alternatively as a\n confiscation of power in the hands of a happy few individuals or as the\n subordination of public concerns to private interests.","PeriodicalId":448349,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of International Arbitration","volume":"240 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International Arbitration\",\"authors\":\"Horatia Muir Watt\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/law/9780198796190.003.0021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter discusses international arbitration as a crucial part of the\\n legal framework that has progressively enabled the contemporary\\n neo-liberal orientation of global governance. As such, it presents the\\n perspective of critical private international law. If the latter\\n discipline constitutes a significant viewpoint in this respect, it is\\n precisely because it provided the foundational legal tools and discourse\\n by means of which international arbitration attained such astounding\\n success as a cornerstone of cross-border trade and investment regimes.\\n The specific contention here is that in sanctifying freedom of contract\\n to an unprecedented degree, including unrestricted party choice of law\\n and forum, it has deactivated the regulatory constraints to which\\n private actors are subject in a domestic setting and, involuntarily\\n thereby, sealed the ‘loss of control’ by nation-states of various\\n crucial aspects of the global economy. The chapter then explores the\\n grievances generally addressed to arbitration as emblematic of the\\n privatization of global governance, understood alternatively as a\\n confiscation of power in the hands of a happy few individuals or as the\\n subordination of public concerns to private interests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":448349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Oxford Handbook of International Arbitration\",\"volume\":\"240 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Oxford Handbook of International Arbitration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198796190.003.0021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of International Arbitration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198796190.003.0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This chapter discusses international arbitration as a crucial part of the
legal framework that has progressively enabled the contemporary
neo-liberal orientation of global governance. As such, it presents the
perspective of critical private international law. If the latter
discipline constitutes a significant viewpoint in this respect, it is
precisely because it provided the foundational legal tools and discourse
by means of which international arbitration attained such astounding
success as a cornerstone of cross-border trade and investment regimes.
The specific contention here is that in sanctifying freedom of contract
to an unprecedented degree, including unrestricted party choice of law
and forum, it has deactivated the regulatory constraints to which
private actors are subject in a domestic setting and, involuntarily
thereby, sealed the ‘loss of control’ by nation-states of various
crucial aspects of the global economy. The chapter then explores the
grievances generally addressed to arbitration as emblematic of the
privatization of global governance, understood alternatively as a
confiscation of power in the hands of a happy few individuals or as the
subordination of public concerns to private interests.