某飞机发动机机队仿真历史数据监测系统算法调整与验证

Igor Loboda, Victor Manuel Pineda Molina, J. Pérez-Ruiz
{"title":"某飞机发动机机队仿真历史数据监测系统算法调整与验证","authors":"Igor Loboda, Victor Manuel Pineda Molina, J. Pérez-Ruiz","doi":"10.1115/gt2021-60020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In the field of gas turbine diagnostics, a significant gap is observed between the variety of proposed and investigated diagnostic solutions and a narrow group of algorithms employed in real monitoring systems. One of the explanations is that diagnostic algorithms of a monitoring system (system components) are usually developed and verified separately from each other. An additional explanation is related to simplified simulated data used to verify the algorithms.\n The present paper aims to adjust and validate the joint operation of the algorithms of a gas turbine monitoring system during the whole lifetime. The software tool called the Propulsion Diagnostic Method Evaluation Strategy (ProDiMES) provides the input data. This tool realistically simulates the steady-state parameters of an aircraft engine fleet. The simulation embraces a total engine life and includes different variations of deterioration and various engine, actuator, and sensor faults.\n Using ProDiMES, some diagnostic solutions have been verified so far. However, they do not include all necessary monitoring system components, use a short fixed-time interval of input data, and do not analyze long-term deterioration. In contrast, this paper presents an attempt to enhance a whole diagnostic process. It considers the operation of various data-driven algorithms of a monitoring system during engine life. The paper focuses on the tuning of the algorithms themselves and adjustment of their interactions.","PeriodicalId":169840,"journal":{"name":"Volume 4: Controls, Diagnostics, and Instrumentation; Cycle Innovations; Cycle Innovations: Energy Storage; Education; Electric Power","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adjustment and Validation of Monitoring System Algorithms on the Simulated Historical Data of an Aircraft Engine Fleet\",\"authors\":\"Igor Loboda, Victor Manuel Pineda Molina, J. Pérez-Ruiz\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/gt2021-60020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In the field of gas turbine diagnostics, a significant gap is observed between the variety of proposed and investigated diagnostic solutions and a narrow group of algorithms employed in real monitoring systems. One of the explanations is that diagnostic algorithms of a monitoring system (system components) are usually developed and verified separately from each other. An additional explanation is related to simplified simulated data used to verify the algorithms.\\n The present paper aims to adjust and validate the joint operation of the algorithms of a gas turbine monitoring system during the whole lifetime. The software tool called the Propulsion Diagnostic Method Evaluation Strategy (ProDiMES) provides the input data. This tool realistically simulates the steady-state parameters of an aircraft engine fleet. The simulation embraces a total engine life and includes different variations of deterioration and various engine, actuator, and sensor faults.\\n Using ProDiMES, some diagnostic solutions have been verified so far. However, they do not include all necessary monitoring system components, use a short fixed-time interval of input data, and do not analyze long-term deterioration. In contrast, this paper presents an attempt to enhance a whole diagnostic process. It considers the operation of various data-driven algorithms of a monitoring system during engine life. The paper focuses on the tuning of the algorithms themselves and adjustment of their interactions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":169840,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 4: Controls, Diagnostics, and Instrumentation; Cycle Innovations; Cycle Innovations: Energy Storage; Education; Electric Power\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 4: Controls, Diagnostics, and Instrumentation; Cycle Innovations; Cycle Innovations: Energy Storage; Education; Electric Power\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2021-60020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 4: Controls, Diagnostics, and Instrumentation; Cycle Innovations; Cycle Innovations: Energy Storage; Education; Electric Power","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2021-60020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在燃气轮机诊断领域,各种提出和研究的诊断解决方案与实际监测系统中使用的一小部分算法之间存在显著差距。其中一种解释是,监测系统(系统组件)的诊断算法通常是彼此分开开发和验证的。另一个解释与用于验证算法的简化模拟数据有关。本文旨在对某燃气轮机监测系统全寿命期内各算法的联合运行进行调整和验证。名为推进诊断方法评估策略(ProDiMES)的软件工具提供输入数据。该工具逼真地模拟了飞机发动机机队的稳态参数。该仿真包含了发动机的总寿命,包括不同的劣化变化和各种发动机、执行器和传感器故障。使用ProDiMES,到目前为止已经验证了一些诊断解决方案。然而,它们不包括所有必要的监测系统组件,使用短的固定时间间隔输入数据,并且不分析长期恶化。相比之下,本文提出了一种改进整个诊断过程的尝试。研究了发动机寿命监测系统中各种数据驱动算法的运行情况。本文的重点是算法本身的调整和它们之间相互作用的调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adjustment and Validation of Monitoring System Algorithms on the Simulated Historical Data of an Aircraft Engine Fleet
In the field of gas turbine diagnostics, a significant gap is observed between the variety of proposed and investigated diagnostic solutions and a narrow group of algorithms employed in real monitoring systems. One of the explanations is that diagnostic algorithms of a monitoring system (system components) are usually developed and verified separately from each other. An additional explanation is related to simplified simulated data used to verify the algorithms. The present paper aims to adjust and validate the joint operation of the algorithms of a gas turbine monitoring system during the whole lifetime. The software tool called the Propulsion Diagnostic Method Evaluation Strategy (ProDiMES) provides the input data. This tool realistically simulates the steady-state parameters of an aircraft engine fleet. The simulation embraces a total engine life and includes different variations of deterioration and various engine, actuator, and sensor faults. Using ProDiMES, some diagnostic solutions have been verified so far. However, they do not include all necessary monitoring system components, use a short fixed-time interval of input data, and do not analyze long-term deterioration. In contrast, this paper presents an attempt to enhance a whole diagnostic process. It considers the operation of various data-driven algorithms of a monitoring system during engine life. The paper focuses on the tuning of the algorithms themselves and adjustment of their interactions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信