VPN、IPSEC和SSL技术安全与管理的观点

Abdelmajid Lakbabi, Ghizlane Orhanou, S. El Hajji
{"title":"VPN、IPSEC和SSL技术安全与管理的观点","authors":"Abdelmajid Lakbabi, Ghizlane Orhanou, S. El Hajji","doi":"10.1109/NGNS.2012.6656108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mobility has driven the need for secure remote access from more locations, end point devices, platforms and environments. Correspondingly, Virtual Private Network (VPN) technology has quickly changed to meet this need. Increasingly, organizations are upgrading their remote access technology from legacy Internet Protocol Security (IPSec VPNs) to more sophisticated Secure Socket Layer VPN (SSL VPN) solutions. We propose to examine the differences between these VPN technologies and approach the accurate criteria for deciding what technology will fit better for networks access needs. In this paper, we will study VPN IPSEC and SSL VPN to have a clear idea about flexibility and security features that the two technologies offer; then help security managers to make the right decision when comparing both protocols Strengths and Weaknesses from a security and management perspective.","PeriodicalId":102045,"journal":{"name":"2012 Next Generation Networks and Services (NGNS)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"VPN IPSEC & SSL technology Security and management point of view\",\"authors\":\"Abdelmajid Lakbabi, Ghizlane Orhanou, S. El Hajji\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NGNS.2012.6656108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mobility has driven the need for secure remote access from more locations, end point devices, platforms and environments. Correspondingly, Virtual Private Network (VPN) technology has quickly changed to meet this need. Increasingly, organizations are upgrading their remote access technology from legacy Internet Protocol Security (IPSec VPNs) to more sophisticated Secure Socket Layer VPN (SSL VPN) solutions. We propose to examine the differences between these VPN technologies and approach the accurate criteria for deciding what technology will fit better for networks access needs. In this paper, we will study VPN IPSEC and SSL VPN to have a clear idea about flexibility and security features that the two technologies offer; then help security managers to make the right decision when comparing both protocols Strengths and Weaknesses from a security and management perspective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":102045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 Next Generation Networks and Services (NGNS)\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 Next Generation Networks and Services (NGNS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NGNS.2012.6656108\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 Next Generation Networks and Services (NGNS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NGNS.2012.6656108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

移动性推动了对来自更多地点、终端设备、平台和环境的安全远程访问的需求。相应地,虚拟专用网(VPN)技术也迅速发展以满足这一需求。越来越多的组织正在将其远程访问技术从传统的互联网协议安全(IPSec VPN)升级到更复杂的安全套接字层VPN (SSL VPN)解决方案。我们建议检查这些VPN技术之间的差异,并接近确定哪种技术更适合网络访问需求的准确标准。在本文中,我们将研究VPN、IPSEC和SSL VPN,以清楚地了解这两种技术所提供的灵活性和安全性;然后帮助安全管理人员在从安全和管理的角度比较协议的优缺点时做出正确的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
VPN IPSEC & SSL technology Security and management point of view
Mobility has driven the need for secure remote access from more locations, end point devices, platforms and environments. Correspondingly, Virtual Private Network (VPN) technology has quickly changed to meet this need. Increasingly, organizations are upgrading their remote access technology from legacy Internet Protocol Security (IPSec VPNs) to more sophisticated Secure Socket Layer VPN (SSL VPN) solutions. We propose to examine the differences between these VPN technologies and approach the accurate criteria for deciding what technology will fit better for networks access needs. In this paper, we will study VPN IPSEC and SSL VPN to have a clear idea about flexibility and security features that the two technologies offer; then help security managers to make the right decision when comparing both protocols Strengths and Weaknesses from a security and management perspective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信