收获期甜菜根核病和根腐病严重程度对采后损失的影响

L. Campbell, C. Windels, K. Fugate, J. Brantner
{"title":"收获期甜菜根核病和根腐病严重程度对采后损失的影响","authors":"L. Campbell, C. Windels, K. Fugate, J. Brantner","doi":"10.5274/JSBR.51.1.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To investigate the effect of Rhizoctonia crown and root rot (RCRR) on postharvest storage properties, roots with similar symptoms (based upon a 0 = no rot to 7 = 100% rotted scale) were grouped together and extractable sucrose, invert sugar, and respiration rate were determined 30 and 90 days after harvest (DAH). The respiration rate of roots 30 DAH with ratings of three, four, and five was 22, 92, and 213%, respectively, greater than roots with a two rating; 90DAH respiration rate increases of 17, 84, and 201% were associated with ratings of three, four and five. The extractable sucrose concentration 30 DAH of roots with ratings of three, four, and five was 4, 14, and 29% less than roots with a two rating. Compared to roots with a two rating, 90-DAH decreases in extractable sucrose concentration of 4, 16, and 35% were associated with ratings of three, four and five. Invert sugar concentrations of roots with ratings of four and five were 3.3 and 10.8 times the concentration of roots with a three rating, 30 DAH. Roots with ratings of four and five had 6.6 and 26.1 times the invert sugar of roots with a three rating 90 DAH.","PeriodicalId":403165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sugarbeet Research","volume":"128 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postharvest Losses Associated with Severity of Rhizoctonia Crown and Root Rot of Sugarbeet at Harvest\",\"authors\":\"L. Campbell, C. Windels, K. Fugate, J. Brantner\",\"doi\":\"10.5274/JSBR.51.1.31\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To investigate the effect of Rhizoctonia crown and root rot (RCRR) on postharvest storage properties, roots with similar symptoms (based upon a 0 = no rot to 7 = 100% rotted scale) were grouped together and extractable sucrose, invert sugar, and respiration rate were determined 30 and 90 days after harvest (DAH). The respiration rate of roots 30 DAH with ratings of three, four, and five was 22, 92, and 213%, respectively, greater than roots with a two rating; 90DAH respiration rate increases of 17, 84, and 201% were associated with ratings of three, four and five. The extractable sucrose concentration 30 DAH of roots with ratings of three, four, and five was 4, 14, and 29% less than roots with a two rating. Compared to roots with a two rating, 90-DAH decreases in extractable sucrose concentration of 4, 16, and 35% were associated with ratings of three, four and five. Invert sugar concentrations of roots with ratings of four and five were 3.3 and 10.8 times the concentration of roots with a three rating, 30 DAH. Roots with ratings of four and five had 6.6 and 26.1 times the invert sugar of roots with a three rating 90 DAH.\",\"PeriodicalId\":403165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sugarbeet Research\",\"volume\":\"128 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sugarbeet Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5274/JSBR.51.1.31\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sugarbeet Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5274/JSBR.51.1.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

为了研究根核菌冠腐病和根腐病(RCRR)对采后贮藏性能的影响,将症状相似的根(根据0 =无腐到7 = 100%腐烂的等级)分组在一起,并在收获后30和90天(DAH)测定可提取蔗糖、转化糖和呼吸速率。3级、4级和5级30 DAH的根系呼吸速率分别为22.2%、92%和213%,高于2级根系;90DAH呼吸速率增加17%、84%和201%与评分为3、4和5有关。等级为3、4和5的根的可提取蔗糖浓度30 DAH比等级为2的根低4、14和29%。与分级为2的根相比,分级为3、4和5的根的可提取蔗糖浓度分别降低了4,16和35%。4级和5级根的转化糖浓度分别是3级根(30dah)的3.3和10.8倍。评级为4和5的根的转化糖是评级为90 DAH的3根的6.6倍和26.1倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Postharvest Losses Associated with Severity of Rhizoctonia Crown and Root Rot of Sugarbeet at Harvest
To investigate the effect of Rhizoctonia crown and root rot (RCRR) on postharvest storage properties, roots with similar symptoms (based upon a 0 = no rot to 7 = 100% rotted scale) were grouped together and extractable sucrose, invert sugar, and respiration rate were determined 30 and 90 days after harvest (DAH). The respiration rate of roots 30 DAH with ratings of three, four, and five was 22, 92, and 213%, respectively, greater than roots with a two rating; 90DAH respiration rate increases of 17, 84, and 201% were associated with ratings of three, four and five. The extractable sucrose concentration 30 DAH of roots with ratings of three, four, and five was 4, 14, and 29% less than roots with a two rating. Compared to roots with a two rating, 90-DAH decreases in extractable sucrose concentration of 4, 16, and 35% were associated with ratings of three, four and five. Invert sugar concentrations of roots with ratings of four and five were 3.3 and 10.8 times the concentration of roots with a three rating, 30 DAH. Roots with ratings of four and five had 6.6 and 26.1 times the invert sugar of roots with a three rating 90 DAH.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信