双价整合风险与封闭式基金溢价

A. Aboulamer, L. Kryzanowski
{"title":"双价整合风险与封闭式基金溢价","authors":"A. Aboulamer, L. Kryzanowski","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2139875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a frictionless world, a closed-end fund’s (CEF’s) premium equals its price minus both its NAVPS (net asset value per share) and present value of the net benefits (PVNB) from liquidity enhancement, managerial abilities after costs, and leverage. The premium can differ further due to frictions resulting from uncertainties about a CEF’s PVNB and its holdings. Complete hedge positions between CEF prices and NAVPS are not possible since their concurrent daily directional changes are not perfectly integrated. We are able to explain over two-thirds of the variation in premiums or their changes for U.S. equity CEFs. As expected, the CEF premium is positively related to liquidity enhancement, CEF performance and net leverage, and negatively related to management fees, gross leverage, cash and bond holdings, and proxies for price equilibrating risks.","PeriodicalId":129035,"journal":{"name":"Empirical Asset Pricing","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dual-price Integration Risks and Closed-end Fund Premiums\",\"authors\":\"A. Aboulamer, L. Kryzanowski\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2139875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a frictionless world, a closed-end fund’s (CEF’s) premium equals its price minus both its NAVPS (net asset value per share) and present value of the net benefits (PVNB) from liquidity enhancement, managerial abilities after costs, and leverage. The premium can differ further due to frictions resulting from uncertainties about a CEF’s PVNB and its holdings. Complete hedge positions between CEF prices and NAVPS are not possible since their concurrent daily directional changes are not perfectly integrated. We are able to explain over two-thirds of the variation in premiums or their changes for U.S. equity CEFs. As expected, the CEF premium is positively related to liquidity enhancement, CEF performance and net leverage, and negatively related to management fees, gross leverage, cash and bond holdings, and proxies for price equilibrating risks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Empirical Asset Pricing\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Empirical Asset Pricing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2139875\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Empirical Asset Pricing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2139875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在一个无摩擦的世界里,封闭式基金(CEF)的溢价等于其价格减去其每股净资产(NAVPS)和净收益(PVNB)的现值,这些净收益来自流动性增强、管理能力(扣除成本后)和杠杆。由于CEF的PVNB及其持股的不确定性导致的摩擦,溢价可能会进一步不同。CEF价格和NAVPS之间的完全对冲头寸是不可能的,因为它们同时发生的每日方向变化并没有完美地整合在一起。我们能够解释超过三分之二的保费变化或美国股票CEFs的变化。正如预期的那样,CEF溢价与流动性增强、CEF业绩和净杠杆呈正相关,与管理费、总杠杆、现金和债券持有量以及价格均衡风险代理呈负相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dual-price Integration Risks and Closed-end Fund Premiums
In a frictionless world, a closed-end fund’s (CEF’s) premium equals its price minus both its NAVPS (net asset value per share) and present value of the net benefits (PVNB) from liquidity enhancement, managerial abilities after costs, and leverage. The premium can differ further due to frictions resulting from uncertainties about a CEF’s PVNB and its holdings. Complete hedge positions between CEF prices and NAVPS are not possible since their concurrent daily directional changes are not perfectly integrated. We are able to explain over two-thirds of the variation in premiums or their changes for U.S. equity CEFs. As expected, the CEF premium is positively related to liquidity enhancement, CEF performance and net leverage, and negatively related to management fees, gross leverage, cash and bond holdings, and proxies for price equilibrating risks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信