儿童权利宪法化的承诺与陷阱

Conor O'Mahony
{"title":"儿童权利宪法化的承诺与陷阱","authors":"Conor O'Mahony","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190694395.013.40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2012, the Irish Constitution was amended by the insertion of a new provision focused on children’s rights. This amendment marked the culmination of a twenty-year campaign driven in large part by the opinion that the Constitution overemphasized the rights of parents and the family unit to the detriment of the rights of children. Campaigners hailed the outcome of the referendum as a historic day, but academic opinion has been more cautious about the true impact and potential of the final version. This article examines the lessons of the Irish experience by first exploring the reasons why children’s rights might be constitutionalized. It then examines the background to the Irish amendment, before drawing some conclusions on its impact and on what can be learned from the Irish experience on the value and limitations of constitutional change as a vehicle for advancing children’s rights.","PeriodicalId":234430,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Children and the Law","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Promises and Pitfalls of Constitutionalizing Children’s Rights\",\"authors\":\"Conor O'Mahony\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190694395.013.40\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2012, the Irish Constitution was amended by the insertion of a new provision focused on children’s rights. This amendment marked the culmination of a twenty-year campaign driven in large part by the opinion that the Constitution overemphasized the rights of parents and the family unit to the detriment of the rights of children. Campaigners hailed the outcome of the referendum as a historic day, but academic opinion has been more cautious about the true impact and potential of the final version. This article examines the lessons of the Irish experience by first exploring the reasons why children’s rights might be constitutionalized. It then examines the background to the Irish amendment, before drawing some conclusions on its impact and on what can be learned from the Irish experience on the value and limitations of constitutional change as a vehicle for advancing children’s rights.\",\"PeriodicalId\":234430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Oxford Handbook of Children and the Law\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Oxford Handbook of Children and the Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190694395.013.40\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Children and the Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190694395.013.40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2012年,《爱尔兰宪法》进行了修订,加入了一项关注儿童权利的新条款。这项修正案标志着一场持续了20年的运动的高潮,这场运动在很大程度上是由一种观点推动的,即宪法过分强调父母和家庭单位的权利,损害了儿童的权利。活动人士称赞公投结果是历史性的一天,但学术界对最终版本的真正影响和潜力持更为谨慎的态度。本文通过探讨儿童权利可能被宪法化的原因,考察爱尔兰经验的教训。然后,它审查了爱尔兰修正案的背景,然后就其影响和可以从爱尔兰的经验中学到的关于宪法改革作为促进儿童权利工具的价值和局限性的一些结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Promises and Pitfalls of Constitutionalizing Children’s Rights
In 2012, the Irish Constitution was amended by the insertion of a new provision focused on children’s rights. This amendment marked the culmination of a twenty-year campaign driven in large part by the opinion that the Constitution overemphasized the rights of parents and the family unit to the detriment of the rights of children. Campaigners hailed the outcome of the referendum as a historic day, but academic opinion has been more cautious about the true impact and potential of the final version. This article examines the lessons of the Irish experience by first exploring the reasons why children’s rights might be constitutionalized. It then examines the background to the Irish amendment, before drawing some conclusions on its impact and on what can be learned from the Irish experience on the value and limitations of constitutional change as a vehicle for advancing children’s rights.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信