混合抽样与元启发式的性能分析

Ryan Dieter Lang, A. Engelbrecht
{"title":"混合抽样与元启发式的性能分析","authors":"Ryan Dieter Lang, A. Engelbrecht","doi":"10.1145/3583133.3590602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the effect of hybridising sampling algorithms with population-based meta-heuristics. Recent literature has shown that alternatives to the traditionally used pseudo-random number generators to generate the initial population of meta-heuristics can improve performance. However, most studies focus on sample sizes that are limited to the size of the initial populations. In contrast, this paper studies the effect of extended random initialisation, which uses relatively large samples and then initialises the meta-heuristics from the points in the sample with the best-found fitness values. A portfolio of three meta-heuristics, four sampling algorithms and three different sampling budgets are analysed from the fixed budget perspective on the BBOB benchmark suite. Statistical analysis of the results shows that the hybrid algorithms converge to better solutions than their non-hybrid counterparts. The results further indicate that large sample sizes can be used to generate landscape analysis features, ensuring reliable approximations of the investigated functions' properties without lessening the meta-heuristics' performance.","PeriodicalId":422029,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Companion Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Analysis of Hybrid Sampling and Meta-heuristics\",\"authors\":\"Ryan Dieter Lang, A. Engelbrecht\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3583133.3590602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates the effect of hybridising sampling algorithms with population-based meta-heuristics. Recent literature has shown that alternatives to the traditionally used pseudo-random number generators to generate the initial population of meta-heuristics can improve performance. However, most studies focus on sample sizes that are limited to the size of the initial populations. In contrast, this paper studies the effect of extended random initialisation, which uses relatively large samples and then initialises the meta-heuristics from the points in the sample with the best-found fitness values. A portfolio of three meta-heuristics, four sampling algorithms and three different sampling budgets are analysed from the fixed budget perspective on the BBOB benchmark suite. Statistical analysis of the results shows that the hybrid algorithms converge to better solutions than their non-hybrid counterparts. The results further indicate that large sample sizes can be used to generate landscape analysis features, ensuring reliable approximations of the investigated functions' properties without lessening the meta-heuristics' performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":422029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Companion Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation\",\"volume\":\"98 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Companion Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3583133.3590602\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Companion Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3583133.3590602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了混合抽样算法与基于总体的元启发式算法的效果。最近的文献表明,替代传统上使用的伪随机数生成器来生成元启发式的初始种群可以提高性能。然而,大多数研究都集中在样本量上,受限于初始种群的大小。相比之下,本文研究了扩展随机初始化的效果,该方法使用较大的样本,然后从样本中具有最佳适应度值的点初始化元启发式。从固定预算的角度分析了三种元启发式算法、四种采样算法和三种不同的采样预算。统计分析结果表明,混合算法比非混合算法收敛到更好的解。结果进一步表明,大样本量可以用于生成景观分析特征,在不降低元启发式性能的情况下,确保所调查函数属性的可靠近似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance Analysis of Hybrid Sampling and Meta-heuristics
This paper investigates the effect of hybridising sampling algorithms with population-based meta-heuristics. Recent literature has shown that alternatives to the traditionally used pseudo-random number generators to generate the initial population of meta-heuristics can improve performance. However, most studies focus on sample sizes that are limited to the size of the initial populations. In contrast, this paper studies the effect of extended random initialisation, which uses relatively large samples and then initialises the meta-heuristics from the points in the sample with the best-found fitness values. A portfolio of three meta-heuristics, four sampling algorithms and three different sampling budgets are analysed from the fixed budget perspective on the BBOB benchmark suite. Statistical analysis of the results shows that the hybrid algorithms converge to better solutions than their non-hybrid counterparts. The results further indicate that large sample sizes can be used to generate landscape analysis features, ensuring reliable approximations of the investigated functions' properties without lessening the meta-heuristics' performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信