工业物联网:NoSQL数据库时间序列的持久化

S. Martino, Luca Fiadone, A. Peron, Alberto Riccabone, Vincenzo Norman Vitale
{"title":"工业物联网:NoSQL数据库时间序列的持久化","authors":"S. Martino, Luca Fiadone, A. Peron, Alberto Riccabone, Vincenzo Norman Vitale","doi":"10.1109/WETICE.2019.00076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the advent of Internet of Things (IoT) tech-nologies, there is a rapidly growing number of connected devices, producing more and more data, potentially useful for a large number of applications. The streams of data coming from each connected device can be seen as collections of Time Series, which need proper techniques to guarantee their persistence. In particular, these solutions must be able to provide both an effective data ingestion and data retrieval, which are challenging tasks. This problem is particularly sensible in the Industrial IoT (IIoT) context, given the potentially great number of equipment that could be instrumented with sensors generating time series. In this study we present the results of an empirical comparison of three NoSQL Database Management Systems, namely Cassandra, MongoDB and InfluxDB, in maintaining and retrieving gigabytes of real IIoT data, collected from an instrumented dressing machine. Results show that, for our specific Time Series dataset, InfluxDB is able to outperform Cassandra in all the considered tests, and has better overall performance respect to MongoDB.","PeriodicalId":116875,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 28th International Conference on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE)","volume":"137 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Industrial Internet of Things: Persistence for Time Series with NoSQL Databases\",\"authors\":\"S. Martino, Luca Fiadone, A. Peron, Alberto Riccabone, Vincenzo Norman Vitale\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WETICE.2019.00076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the advent of Internet of Things (IoT) tech-nologies, there is a rapidly growing number of connected devices, producing more and more data, potentially useful for a large number of applications. The streams of data coming from each connected device can be seen as collections of Time Series, which need proper techniques to guarantee their persistence. In particular, these solutions must be able to provide both an effective data ingestion and data retrieval, which are challenging tasks. This problem is particularly sensible in the Industrial IoT (IIoT) context, given the potentially great number of equipment that could be instrumented with sensors generating time series. In this study we present the results of an empirical comparison of three NoSQL Database Management Systems, namely Cassandra, MongoDB and InfluxDB, in maintaining and retrieving gigabytes of real IIoT data, collected from an instrumented dressing machine. Results show that, for our specific Time Series dataset, InfluxDB is able to outperform Cassandra in all the considered tests, and has better overall performance respect to MongoDB.\",\"PeriodicalId\":116875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE 28th International Conference on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE)\",\"volume\":\"137 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE 28th International Conference on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WETICE.2019.00076\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 28th International Conference on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WETICE.2019.00076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

随着物联网(IoT)技术的出现,连接设备的数量迅速增长,产生越来越多的数据,可能对大量应用程序有用。来自每个连接设备的数据流可以被视为时间序列的集合,需要适当的技术来保证它们的持久性。特别是,这些解决方案必须能够提供有效的数据摄取和数据检索,这是具有挑战性的任务。这个问题在工业物联网(IIoT)环境中尤其明显,因为潜在的大量设备可以用生成时间序列的传感器进行检测。在这项研究中,我们展示了三个NoSQL数据库管理系统(即Cassandra, MongoDB和InfluxDB)在维护和检索从仪器化梳妆机收集的千兆字节的真实工业物联网数据方面的经验比较结果。结果表明,对于我们特定的时间序列数据集,InfluxDB能够在所有考虑的测试中优于Cassandra,并且相对于MongoDB具有更好的整体性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Industrial Internet of Things: Persistence for Time Series with NoSQL Databases
With the advent of Internet of Things (IoT) tech-nologies, there is a rapidly growing number of connected devices, producing more and more data, potentially useful for a large number of applications. The streams of data coming from each connected device can be seen as collections of Time Series, which need proper techniques to guarantee their persistence. In particular, these solutions must be able to provide both an effective data ingestion and data retrieval, which are challenging tasks. This problem is particularly sensible in the Industrial IoT (IIoT) context, given the potentially great number of equipment that could be instrumented with sensors generating time series. In this study we present the results of an empirical comparison of three NoSQL Database Management Systems, namely Cassandra, MongoDB and InfluxDB, in maintaining and retrieving gigabytes of real IIoT data, collected from an instrumented dressing machine. Results show that, for our specific Time Series dataset, InfluxDB is able to outperform Cassandra in all the considered tests, and has better overall performance respect to MongoDB.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信