森加斯

Lukas Mengelkamp
{"title":"森加斯","authors":"Lukas Mengelkamp","doi":"10.35998/fw-2021-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The arms control regime is on the verge of collapse. In view of this, is a re-evaluation of older ideas on deterrence and arms control worthwhile? The article answers this question approvingly using Dieter Senghaas’ critique of deterrence and arms control as an example. After introducing this critique and contemporary counter-criticism in the 1970s, the paper attempts to show Senghaas current relevance against the background of the state of research in recent nuclear history. The latter emphasizes the persistent U. S. pursuit of relative nuclear superiority, which is difficult to reconcile with notions of “strategic stability” and “balance”.","PeriodicalId":135312,"journal":{"name":"Die Friedens-Warte","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Organisierte Friedlosigkeit – Dieter Senghaas’ Abschreckungskritik\",\"authors\":\"Lukas Mengelkamp\",\"doi\":\"10.35998/fw-2021-0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The arms control regime is on the verge of collapse. In view of this, is a re-evaluation of older ideas on deterrence and arms control worthwhile? The article answers this question approvingly using Dieter Senghaas’ critique of deterrence and arms control as an example. After introducing this critique and contemporary counter-criticism in the 1970s, the paper attempts to show Senghaas current relevance against the background of the state of research in recent nuclear history. The latter emphasizes the persistent U. S. pursuit of relative nuclear superiority, which is difficult to reconcile with notions of “strategic stability” and “balance”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":135312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Die Friedens-Warte\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Die Friedens-Warte\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35998/fw-2021-0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Die Friedens-Warte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35998/fw-2021-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

军备控制制度正处于崩溃的边缘。鉴于此,重新评估威慑和军备控制的旧观念是否值得?本文以迪特尔·森哈斯(Dieter Senghaas)对威慑和军备控制的批判为例,赞许地回答了这个问题。在介绍了这种批评和20世纪70年代的当代反批评之后,本文试图在最近核历史研究状况的背景下展示森哈斯的当前相关性。后者强调美国对相对核优势的持续追求,这与“战略稳定”和“平衡”的概念难以调和。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Organisierte Friedlosigkeit – Dieter Senghaas’ Abschreckungskritik
The arms control regime is on the verge of collapse. In view of this, is a re-evaluation of older ideas on deterrence and arms control worthwhile? The article answers this question approvingly using Dieter Senghaas’ critique of deterrence and arms control as an example. After introducing this critique and contemporary counter-criticism in the 1970s, the paper attempts to show Senghaas current relevance against the background of the state of research in recent nuclear history. The latter emphasizes the persistent U. S. pursuit of relative nuclear superiority, which is difficult to reconcile with notions of “strategic stability” and “balance”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信