Riska Agustina, Grace Sharon, L. Yustitianingtyas, H. Widodo
{"title":"Covid-19的强制性接种政策是基于福利、公共利益和人权原则的","authors":"Riska Agustina, Grace Sharon, L. Yustitianingtyas, H. Widodo","doi":"10.22219/ilrej.v1i3.18244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 vaccine policy received rejection in some communities. The reason for the rejection that many people put forward is the absence of clinical trials on vaccines, as well as the public's assumption that the rule violates human rights. The purpose of this study to find out the implementation of the mandatory policy of Covid-19 vaccination is reviewed from the principle of benefits and principles of public interest and is not contrary to human rights. This research is normative juridical and uses qualitative research methods. This article's contribution is intended for the wider community to know more clearly about the Covid-19 vaccination policy.\nKeywords: Human rights, The principle of benefit, The principle of public interest, Mandatory; Policy; COVID-19.\nAbstrak\nKebijakan vaksin COVID-19 mendapat penolakan dibeberapa masyarat. Alasan penolakan yang banyak dikemukakan oleh masyarakat adalah belum adanya uji klinis atas vaksin, serta anggapan masyarakat tentang aturan tersebut melanggar hak asasi manusia (HAM). Namun di sisi lain kegiatan vaksinasi dinilai sangat penting serta bermanfaat bagi kepentingan masyarakat umum. Sehingga tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui penerapan kebijakan wajib vaksinasi Covid-19 telah sesuai dengan asas manfaat dan asas kepentingan umum serta tidak bertentangan dengan hak asasi manusia (HAM). Penelitian ini bersifat yuridis normatif serta menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif. Kontribusi tulisan ini ditujukan bagi masyarakat luas untuk mengetahui lebih jelas tentang kebijakan vaksinasi Covid-19.","PeriodicalId":404317,"journal":{"name":"Indonesia Law Reform Journal","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kebijakan Wajib Vaksinansi Covid-19 Ditinjau dari Asas Manfaat, Kepentingan Umum dan Hak Asasi Manusia\",\"authors\":\"Riska Agustina, Grace Sharon, L. Yustitianingtyas, H. Widodo\",\"doi\":\"10.22219/ilrej.v1i3.18244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The COVID-19 vaccine policy received rejection in some communities. The reason for the rejection that many people put forward is the absence of clinical trials on vaccines, as well as the public's assumption that the rule violates human rights. The purpose of this study to find out the implementation of the mandatory policy of Covid-19 vaccination is reviewed from the principle of benefits and principles of public interest and is not contrary to human rights. This research is normative juridical and uses qualitative research methods. This article's contribution is intended for the wider community to know more clearly about the Covid-19 vaccination policy.\\nKeywords: Human rights, The principle of benefit, The principle of public interest, Mandatory; Policy; COVID-19.\\nAbstrak\\nKebijakan vaksin COVID-19 mendapat penolakan dibeberapa masyarat. Alasan penolakan yang banyak dikemukakan oleh masyarakat adalah belum adanya uji klinis atas vaksin, serta anggapan masyarakat tentang aturan tersebut melanggar hak asasi manusia (HAM). Namun di sisi lain kegiatan vaksinasi dinilai sangat penting serta bermanfaat bagi kepentingan masyarakat umum. Sehingga tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui penerapan kebijakan wajib vaksinasi Covid-19 telah sesuai dengan asas manfaat dan asas kepentingan umum serta tidak bertentangan dengan hak asasi manusia (HAM). Penelitian ini bersifat yuridis normatif serta menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif. Kontribusi tulisan ini ditujukan bagi masyarakat luas untuk mengetahui lebih jelas tentang kebijakan vaksinasi Covid-19.\",\"PeriodicalId\":404317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indonesia Law Reform Journal\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indonesia Law Reform Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v1i3.18244\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesia Law Reform Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v1i3.18244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
COVID-19疫苗政策在一些社区遭到拒绝。许多人提出反对的理由是缺乏对疫苗的临床试验,以及公众认为该规定侵犯了人权。本研究的目的是从利益原则和公共利益原则的角度来审视新冠肺炎强制性疫苗接种政策的实施,并没有违反人权。本研究采用规范的法学和定性的研究方法。本文的贡献旨在让更广泛的社区更清楚地了解Covid-19疫苗接种政策。关键词:人权;利益原则;公共利益原则;政策;新型冠状病毒肺炎[摘要]新冠肺炎(COVID-19)的研究进展。Alasan penolakan yang banyak dikemukakan oleh masyarakat adalah belum adanya uji klinis atas vaksin, serta anggapan masyarakat tentan turan tersebut melanggar hak asasasnia (HAM)。Namun di sisi lain kegiatan vaksinasi dinilai sangat penting serta bermanfaat bagi kettingan和masyarakat umum。新冠肺炎新冠肺炎流行病学研究进展:新冠肺炎流行病学研究进展、流行病学研究进展、流行病学研究进展、流行病学研究进展、流行病学研究进展和流行病学研究进展。penpentian的用法和样例:penpentian的用法和样例:在新冠肺炎疫情暴发前,我们要先做好防疫准备。
Kebijakan Wajib Vaksinansi Covid-19 Ditinjau dari Asas Manfaat, Kepentingan Umum dan Hak Asasi Manusia
The COVID-19 vaccine policy received rejection in some communities. The reason for the rejection that many people put forward is the absence of clinical trials on vaccines, as well as the public's assumption that the rule violates human rights. The purpose of this study to find out the implementation of the mandatory policy of Covid-19 vaccination is reviewed from the principle of benefits and principles of public interest and is not contrary to human rights. This research is normative juridical and uses qualitative research methods. This article's contribution is intended for the wider community to know more clearly about the Covid-19 vaccination policy.
Keywords: Human rights, The principle of benefit, The principle of public interest, Mandatory; Policy; COVID-19.
Abstrak
Kebijakan vaksin COVID-19 mendapat penolakan dibeberapa masyarat. Alasan penolakan yang banyak dikemukakan oleh masyarakat adalah belum adanya uji klinis atas vaksin, serta anggapan masyarakat tentang aturan tersebut melanggar hak asasi manusia (HAM). Namun di sisi lain kegiatan vaksinasi dinilai sangat penting serta bermanfaat bagi kepentingan masyarakat umum. Sehingga tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui penerapan kebijakan wajib vaksinasi Covid-19 telah sesuai dengan asas manfaat dan asas kepentingan umum serta tidak bertentangan dengan hak asasi manusia (HAM). Penelitian ini bersifat yuridis normatif serta menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif. Kontribusi tulisan ini ditujukan bagi masyarakat luas untuk mengetahui lebih jelas tentang kebijakan vaksinasi Covid-19.