fsm特征监控方案效率比较

Proceedings of ASP-DAC'95/CHDL'95/VLSI'95 with EDA Technofair Pub Date : 1995-08-29 DOI:10.1109/ASPDAC.1995.486391

R. Rochet, R. Leveugle, G. Saucier

{"title":"fsm特征监控方案效率比较","authors":"R. Rochet, R. Leveugle, G. Saucier","doi":"10.1109/ASPDAC.1995.486391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper addresses the detection of permanent and transient faults in complex VLSI circuits, with a particular focus on faults leading to sequencing errors. Several Finite State Machine implementations using signature monitoring for control-flow checking are compared in terms of error detection latency, theoretical error coverage, experimental error coverage and area overheads. Advantages and drawbacks of each approach are presented.","PeriodicalId":119232,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of ASP-DAC'95/CHDL'95/VLSI'95 with EDA Technofair","volume":"106 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficiency comparison of signature monitoring schemes for FSMs\",\"authors\":\"R. Rochet, R. Leveugle, G. Saucier\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ASPDAC.1995.486391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper addresses the detection of permanent and transient faults in complex VLSI circuits, with a particular focus on faults leading to sequencing errors. Several Finite State Machine implementations using signature monitoring for control-flow checking are compared in terms of error detection latency, theoretical error coverage, experimental error coverage and area overheads. Advantages and drawbacks of each approach are presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":119232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of ASP-DAC'95/CHDL'95/VLSI'95 with EDA Technofair\",\"volume\":\"106 6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of ASP-DAC'95/CHDL'95/VLSI'95 with EDA Technofair\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASPDAC.1995.486391\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of ASP-DAC'95/CHDL'95/VLSI'95 with EDA Technofair","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASPDAC.1995.486391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 8

摘要

本文讨论了复杂VLSI电路中永久和暂态故障的检测，特别关注导致排序错误的故障。在错误检测延迟、理论错误覆盖、实验错误覆盖和区域开销方面，比较了几种使用签名监控进行控制流检查的有限状态机实现。介绍了每种方法的优缺点。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Efficiency comparison of signature monitoring schemes for FSMs

This paper addresses the detection of permanent and transient faults in complex VLSI circuits, with a particular focus on faults leading to sequencing errors. Several Finite State Machine implementations using signature monitoring for control-flow checking are compared in terms of error detection latency, theoretical error coverage, experimental error coverage and area overheads. Advantages and drawbacks of each approach are presented.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Proceedings of ASP-DAC'95/CHDL'95/VLSI'95 with EDA Technofair

自引率

0.00%

发文量