Sharma Kattel, D. Manning, P. Erwin, Harrison Wood, D. Kashiwagi, M. Murad
{"title":"出院时的信息传递:一项系统综述。","authors":"Sharma Kattel, D. Manning, P. Erwin, Harrison Wood, D. Kashiwagi, M. Murad","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000000248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nPrompt, complete, and accurate information transfer at the time of discharge between hospital-based and primary care providers (PCPs) is needed for the provision of safe and effective care.\n\n\nPURPOSE OF THE STUDY\nTo evaluate timeliness, quality, and interventions to improve timeliness and quality of hospital discharge summaries.\n\n\nDATA SOURCES\nPubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus database published in English between January 2007 and February 2014 were searched. We also hand-searched bibliographies of relevant articles.\n\n\nSTUDY SELECTION\nObservational studies investigating transfer of information at hospital discharge (n = 7) and controlled studies evaluating interventions to improve timeliness and quality of discharge information (n = 12) were included.\n\n\nDATA EXTRACTION\nWe extracted data on availability, timeliness, and content of hospital discharge summaries and on the effectiveness of interventions targeting discharge summaries. Results of studies are presented narratively and using descriptive statistics.\n\n\nDATA SYNTHESIS\nAcross the studies, discharge summaries were completed within 48 hours in a median of 67% and were available to PCPs within 48 hours only 55% of the time. Most of the time, discharge summaries included demographics, primary diagnosis, hospital course, and discharge instructions. However, information was limited to pending test results (25%), diagnostic tests performed (60%), and postdischarge medications (78%). In 6 interventional studies, implementation of electronic discharge summaries was associated with improvement in timeliness but not quality.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nDelayed or insufficient transfer of discharge information between hospital-based providers and PCPs remains common. Creation of electronic discharge summaries seems to improve timeliness and availability but does not consistently improve quality.","PeriodicalId":206245,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Patient Safety","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"71","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Information Transfer at Hospital Discharge: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Sharma Kattel, D. Manning, P. Erwin, Harrison Wood, D. Kashiwagi, M. Murad\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PTS.0000000000000248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nPrompt, complete, and accurate information transfer at the time of discharge between hospital-based and primary care providers (PCPs) is needed for the provision of safe and effective care.\\n\\n\\nPURPOSE OF THE STUDY\\nTo evaluate timeliness, quality, and interventions to improve timeliness and quality of hospital discharge summaries.\\n\\n\\nDATA SOURCES\\nPubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus database published in English between January 2007 and February 2014 were searched. We also hand-searched bibliographies of relevant articles.\\n\\n\\nSTUDY SELECTION\\nObservational studies investigating transfer of information at hospital discharge (n = 7) and controlled studies evaluating interventions to improve timeliness and quality of discharge information (n = 12) were included.\\n\\n\\nDATA EXTRACTION\\nWe extracted data on availability, timeliness, and content of hospital discharge summaries and on the effectiveness of interventions targeting discharge summaries. Results of studies are presented narratively and using descriptive statistics.\\n\\n\\nDATA SYNTHESIS\\nAcross the studies, discharge summaries were completed within 48 hours in a median of 67% and were available to PCPs within 48 hours only 55% of the time. Most of the time, discharge summaries included demographics, primary diagnosis, hospital course, and discharge instructions. However, information was limited to pending test results (25%), diagnostic tests performed (60%), and postdischarge medications (78%). In 6 interventional studies, implementation of electronic discharge summaries was associated with improvement in timeliness but not quality.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nDelayed or insufficient transfer of discharge information between hospital-based providers and PCPs remains common. Creation of electronic discharge summaries seems to improve timeliness and availability but does not consistently improve quality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":206245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Patient Safety\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"71\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Patient Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000248\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 71
摘要
背景:在出院时,医院和初级保健提供者(pcp)之间需要及时、完整和准确的信息传递,以提供安全有效的护理。研究目的:评价出院摘要的及时性、质量和干预措施,以提高出院摘要的及时性和质量。检索2007年1月至2014年2月出版的英文版pubmed、MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、Web of Science和Scopus数据库。我们还手工检索了相关文章的参考书目。研究选择纳入调查出院时信息传递的观察性研究(n = 7)和评估改善出院信息及时性和质量的干预措施的对照研究(n = 12)。数据提取我们提取了出院摘要的可用性、及时性和内容以及针对出院摘要的干预措施的有效性的数据。研究结果以叙述的方式呈现,并使用描述性统计。在所有研究中,出院总结在48小时内完成的中位数为67%,而在48小时内提供给pcp的时间只有55%。大多数情况下,出院总结包括人口统计、初步诊断、住院过程和出院说明。然而,这些信息仅限于待检测结果(25%)、已进行的诊断测试(60%)和出院后用药(78%)。在6项干预性研究中,电子出院摘要的实施与及时性的提高有关,但与质量无关。结论医院提供者与pcp之间延迟或不充分的出院信息传递仍然普遍存在。创建电子出院摘要似乎提高了时效性和可用性,但并没有持续提高质量。
Information Transfer at Hospital Discharge: A Systematic Review.
BACKGROUND
Prompt, complete, and accurate information transfer at the time of discharge between hospital-based and primary care providers (PCPs) is needed for the provision of safe and effective care.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY
To evaluate timeliness, quality, and interventions to improve timeliness and quality of hospital discharge summaries.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus database published in English between January 2007 and February 2014 were searched. We also hand-searched bibliographies of relevant articles.
STUDY SELECTION
Observational studies investigating transfer of information at hospital discharge (n = 7) and controlled studies evaluating interventions to improve timeliness and quality of discharge information (n = 12) were included.
DATA EXTRACTION
We extracted data on availability, timeliness, and content of hospital discharge summaries and on the effectiveness of interventions targeting discharge summaries. Results of studies are presented narratively and using descriptive statistics.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Across the studies, discharge summaries were completed within 48 hours in a median of 67% and were available to PCPs within 48 hours only 55% of the time. Most of the time, discharge summaries included demographics, primary diagnosis, hospital course, and discharge instructions. However, information was limited to pending test results (25%), diagnostic tests performed (60%), and postdischarge medications (78%). In 6 interventional studies, implementation of electronic discharge summaries was associated with improvement in timeliness but not quality.
CONCLUSIONS
Delayed or insufficient transfer of discharge information between hospital-based providers and PCPs remains common. Creation of electronic discharge summaries seems to improve timeliness and availability but does not consistently improve quality.