应用电脑建模以简化教学过程

{"title":"应用电脑建模以简化教学过程","authors":"","doi":"10.18469/ikt.2022.20.3.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article describes some actual issues related to computer modeling of educational processes in the context of developing information technologies and increasing use of distance learning elements. Definitions of various learning types are given: in-person, distance, interactive, collaborative. Various options of students' work are determined, such as taking notes, questioning, Case method, testing, laboratory and calculation-graphic works. Performance and evaluation criteria are defined for each of the methods. A scale for assessing the complexity of each type of work has been developed. The average integral and complex integral assessments for all criteria have been derived. As a result of comparing the average integral and complex integral assessments, it is shown that interactive learning is the most preferable among the other types of learning considered in this article. Interactive learning contributes to improving the quality of education through the possibility of interaction between participants in the learning process. The possibility of active joint search for information, its discussion, comprehension and application make the interactive learning option more productive in terms of motivation of students.","PeriodicalId":245247,"journal":{"name":"Infokommunikacionnye tehnologii","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"APPLICATION OF COMPUTER MODELING TO STREAMLINE THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.18469/ikt.2022.20.3.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article describes some actual issues related to computer modeling of educational processes in the context of developing information technologies and increasing use of distance learning elements. Definitions of various learning types are given: in-person, distance, interactive, collaborative. Various options of students' work are determined, such as taking notes, questioning, Case method, testing, laboratory and calculation-graphic works. Performance and evaluation criteria are defined for each of the methods. A scale for assessing the complexity of each type of work has been developed. The average integral and complex integral assessments for all criteria have been derived. As a result of comparing the average integral and complex integral assessments, it is shown that interactive learning is the most preferable among the other types of learning considered in this article. Interactive learning contributes to improving the quality of education through the possibility of interaction between participants in the learning process. The possibility of active joint search for information, its discussion, comprehension and application make the interactive learning option more productive in terms of motivation of students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":245247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infokommunikacionnye tehnologii\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infokommunikacionnye tehnologii\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18469/ikt.2022.20.3.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infokommunikacionnye tehnologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18469/ikt.2022.20.3.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文描述了在发展信息技术和增加远程学习元素使用的背景下,与教育过程的计算机建模有关的一些实际问题。给出了各种学习类型的定义:面对面、远程、互动、协作。确定了学生作业的多种选择,如记笔记、提问、案例法、测试、实验和计算图形作业。为每种方法定义了性能和评估标准。已经制定了评估每一种工作的复杂程度的尺度。导出了所有准则的平均积分和复积分评价。通过对平均积分和复杂积分评估的比较,我们发现在本文所考虑的其他类型的学习中,互动学习是最可取的。互动学习通过学习过程中参与者之间的互动,有助于提高教育质量。主动联合搜索信息、讨论、理解和应用的可能性,使交互式学习选项在学生的动机方面更富有成效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
APPLICATION OF COMPUTER MODELING TO STREAMLINE THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS
The article describes some actual issues related to computer modeling of educational processes in the context of developing information technologies and increasing use of distance learning elements. Definitions of various learning types are given: in-person, distance, interactive, collaborative. Various options of students' work are determined, such as taking notes, questioning, Case method, testing, laboratory and calculation-graphic works. Performance and evaluation criteria are defined for each of the methods. A scale for assessing the complexity of each type of work has been developed. The average integral and complex integral assessments for all criteria have been derived. As a result of comparing the average integral and complex integral assessments, it is shown that interactive learning is the most preferable among the other types of learning considered in this article. Interactive learning contributes to improving the quality of education through the possibility of interaction between participants in the learning process. The possibility of active joint search for information, its discussion, comprehension and application make the interactive learning option more productive in terms of motivation of students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信