冷却技术的热力学与传热分析:比较研究

W. R. I. Novais, E. P. Cerqueira, B. Narváez-Romo, J. Simões-Moreira
{"title":"冷却技术的热力学与传热分析:比较研究","authors":"W. R. I. Novais, E. P. Cerqueira, B. Narváez-Romo, J. Simões-Moreira","doi":"10.5380/reterm.v21i1.86687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Refrigeration systems applications are broadly used in food and drug conservation and in air conditioning systems. Commercial buildings may demand as much as 80% of total electrical power just for powering the air-conditioning system based on conventional vapor compression refrigeration systems (VCRS), which contributes to reach peak demands on the electrical distribution network that could cause an unstable condition. Implementing absorption refrigeration systems (ARS) to produce cooling effects driven by thermal energy could decrease that power demand. Thermodynamic models of these systems can be found in the literature with a variety of working fluids and also integrated with other cycles such as power generation plants. However, a few previous analyses have a direct comparison between ARS and VCRS at the same operational conditions. Thus, the current study aims to simulate and compare two different refrigeration technologies: single stage ammonia-water absorption refrigeration system and vapor compression refrigeration system working with refrigerants R-134a and R-717. Thermodynamic simulation was carried out by evaluating heat transfer rates in the main devices, coefficients of performance, and specific areas of evaporator and condenser. As evaporator temperature decreases from 10°C to -20°C, ARS requires 16.9 kW or 67.5% more heat in generator and COP decreased from 0.601 to 0.359. Utilizing the same comparison parameter, VCRS needed 3.26-3.54 kW or 154-160% more compressor power, depending on refrigerant used, and COP decreased from 6.77 to 2.60 with R-134a and 7.07 to 2.79 using R-717 at the same condensation temperature (40°C). Compared to ARS, condenser specific area required for VCRS is smaller, evaporator is twofold smaller when using R-134a, and is equal when using R-717. Those results can justify the usage of ARS in facilities with high amount of waste heat, mainly on applications working with lower evaporator temperatures.","PeriodicalId":106768,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Engenharia Térmica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THERMODYNAMIC AND HEAT TRANSFER ANALYSIS OF COOLING TECHNOLOGIES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY\",\"authors\":\"W. R. I. Novais, E. P. Cerqueira, B. Narváez-Romo, J. Simões-Moreira\",\"doi\":\"10.5380/reterm.v21i1.86687\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Refrigeration systems applications are broadly used in food and drug conservation and in air conditioning systems. Commercial buildings may demand as much as 80% of total electrical power just for powering the air-conditioning system based on conventional vapor compression refrigeration systems (VCRS), which contributes to reach peak demands on the electrical distribution network that could cause an unstable condition. Implementing absorption refrigeration systems (ARS) to produce cooling effects driven by thermal energy could decrease that power demand. Thermodynamic models of these systems can be found in the literature with a variety of working fluids and also integrated with other cycles such as power generation plants. However, a few previous analyses have a direct comparison between ARS and VCRS at the same operational conditions. Thus, the current study aims to simulate and compare two different refrigeration technologies: single stage ammonia-water absorption refrigeration system and vapor compression refrigeration system working with refrigerants R-134a and R-717. Thermodynamic simulation was carried out by evaluating heat transfer rates in the main devices, coefficients of performance, and specific areas of evaporator and condenser. As evaporator temperature decreases from 10°C to -20°C, ARS requires 16.9 kW or 67.5% more heat in generator and COP decreased from 0.601 to 0.359. Utilizing the same comparison parameter, VCRS needed 3.26-3.54 kW or 154-160% more compressor power, depending on refrigerant used, and COP decreased from 6.77 to 2.60 with R-134a and 7.07 to 2.79 using R-717 at the same condensation temperature (40°C). Compared to ARS, condenser specific area required for VCRS is smaller, evaporator is twofold smaller when using R-134a, and is equal when using R-717. Those results can justify the usage of ARS in facilities with high amount of waste heat, mainly on applications working with lower evaporator temperatures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Engenharia Térmica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Engenharia Térmica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5380/reterm.v21i1.86687\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Engenharia Térmica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5380/reterm.v21i1.86687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

制冷系统广泛应用于食品和药品的保存以及空调系统中。商业建筑可能需要多达80%的总电力来为基于传统蒸汽压缩制冷系统(VCRS)的空调系统供电,这有助于达到配电网络的峰值需求,从而导致不稳定的状态。实施吸收式制冷系统(ARS)来产生由热能驱动的冷却效果可以减少电力需求。这些系统的热力学模型可以在各种工作流体的文献中找到,也可以与其他循环(如发电厂)集成。然而,先前的一些分析在相同的操作条件下对ARS和VCRS进行了直接比较。因此,本研究旨在模拟和比较两种不同的制冷技术:单级氨-水吸收式制冷系统和蒸汽压缩制冷系统,制冷剂为R-134a和R-717。通过对主要装置的传热速率、性能系数以及蒸发器和冷凝器的具体面积进行了热力学模拟。当蒸发器温度从10°C降低到-20°C时,ARS需要16.9 kW或67.5%的发电机热量,COP从0.601降低到0.359。使用相同的比较参数,根据制冷剂的不同,VCRS需要3.26-3.54 kW或154-160%的压缩机功率,并且在相同的冷凝温度(40℃)下,R-134a的COP从6.77降至2.60,R-717的COP从7.07降至2.79。与ARS相比,VCRS所需的冷凝器比面积更小,蒸发器比面积为R-134a的2倍,与R-717相当。这些结果可以证明在有大量废热的设施中使用ARS是合理的,主要是在蒸发器温度较低的应用中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THERMODYNAMIC AND HEAT TRANSFER ANALYSIS OF COOLING TECHNOLOGIES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
Refrigeration systems applications are broadly used in food and drug conservation and in air conditioning systems. Commercial buildings may demand as much as 80% of total electrical power just for powering the air-conditioning system based on conventional vapor compression refrigeration systems (VCRS), which contributes to reach peak demands on the electrical distribution network that could cause an unstable condition. Implementing absorption refrigeration systems (ARS) to produce cooling effects driven by thermal energy could decrease that power demand. Thermodynamic models of these systems can be found in the literature with a variety of working fluids and also integrated with other cycles such as power generation plants. However, a few previous analyses have a direct comparison between ARS and VCRS at the same operational conditions. Thus, the current study aims to simulate and compare two different refrigeration technologies: single stage ammonia-water absorption refrigeration system and vapor compression refrigeration system working with refrigerants R-134a and R-717. Thermodynamic simulation was carried out by evaluating heat transfer rates in the main devices, coefficients of performance, and specific areas of evaporator and condenser. As evaporator temperature decreases from 10°C to -20°C, ARS requires 16.9 kW or 67.5% more heat in generator and COP decreased from 0.601 to 0.359. Utilizing the same comparison parameter, VCRS needed 3.26-3.54 kW or 154-160% more compressor power, depending on refrigerant used, and COP decreased from 6.77 to 2.60 with R-134a and 7.07 to 2.79 using R-717 at the same condensation temperature (40°C). Compared to ARS, condenser specific area required for VCRS is smaller, evaporator is twofold smaller when using R-134a, and is equal when using R-717. Those results can justify the usage of ARS in facilities with high amount of waste heat, mainly on applications working with lower evaporator temperatures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信