业务流程自动化:印尼公共部门内部审计职能适应经验

Syanni Yustiani, M. Ichsan
{"title":"业务流程自动化:印尼公共部门内部审计职能适应经验","authors":"Syanni Yustiani, M. Ichsan","doi":"10.2991/aprish-18.2019.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to analyze the transformation of the Inspectorate General (ITJEN) at the Ministry of Finance as an impact of the Directorate General’s (DGT) Taxation System Information (SIDJP) implementation. This study uses a case study and a qualitative approach with institutional theory to study the problem. Data collection is performed via documentation and interviews with key informants from the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA), the DGT of Taxation, the Indonesian Supreme Audit Institution, the State Development Audit Agency, and the Auditor of Inspectorate General of Ministry of Finance. This study shows that the implementation of SIDJP engendered adaptation of ITJEN’s scope and practice, structure, auditor skill requirements, audit tools, audit sizes, and relationship with information technology departments, whereas the audit source and its relationship with the external auditor remained the same. Keywords—Internal audit, system information, institutional theory, institutional logic, Business Process Automation, Indonesian Public Sector.","PeriodicalId":111073,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 3rd Asia-Pacific Research in Social Sciences and Humanities Universitas Indonesia Conference (APRISH 2018)","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Business Process Automation: Internal Audit Function Adaptation Lesson Learned from Indonesian Public Sector\",\"authors\":\"Syanni Yustiani, M. Ichsan\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/aprish-18.2019.36\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study is to analyze the transformation of the Inspectorate General (ITJEN) at the Ministry of Finance as an impact of the Directorate General’s (DGT) Taxation System Information (SIDJP) implementation. This study uses a case study and a qualitative approach with institutional theory to study the problem. Data collection is performed via documentation and interviews with key informants from the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA), the DGT of Taxation, the Indonesian Supreme Audit Institution, the State Development Audit Agency, and the Auditor of Inspectorate General of Ministry of Finance. This study shows that the implementation of SIDJP engendered adaptation of ITJEN’s scope and practice, structure, auditor skill requirements, audit tools, audit sizes, and relationship with information technology departments, whereas the audit source and its relationship with the external auditor remained the same. Keywords—Internal audit, system information, institutional theory, institutional logic, Business Process Automation, Indonesian Public Sector.\",\"PeriodicalId\":111073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 3rd Asia-Pacific Research in Social Sciences and Humanities Universitas Indonesia Conference (APRISH 2018)\",\"volume\":\"106 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 3rd Asia-Pacific Research in Social Sciences and Humanities Universitas Indonesia Conference (APRISH 2018)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/aprish-18.2019.36\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 3rd Asia-Pacific Research in Social Sciences and Humanities Universitas Indonesia Conference (APRISH 2018)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/aprish-18.2019.36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究的目的是分析财政部监察长(ITJEN)的转型对总局(DGT)税收系统信息(SIDJP)实施的影响。本研究采用个案研究和制度理论的定性方法来研究这一问题。数据收集是通过记录和采访来自内部审计员协会(IIA)、税务总局、印度尼西亚最高审计署、国家发展审计署和财政部监察长审计员的关键线人来完成的。本研究表明,实施SIDJP导致了ITJEN的范围和实践、结构、审计师技能要求、审计工具、审计规模以及与信息技术部门的关系的调整,而审计来源及其与外部审计师的关系保持不变。关键词:内部审计,系统信息,制度理论,制度逻辑,业务流程自动化,印尼公共部门
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Business Process Automation: Internal Audit Function Adaptation Lesson Learned from Indonesian Public Sector
The purpose of this study is to analyze the transformation of the Inspectorate General (ITJEN) at the Ministry of Finance as an impact of the Directorate General’s (DGT) Taxation System Information (SIDJP) implementation. This study uses a case study and a qualitative approach with institutional theory to study the problem. Data collection is performed via documentation and interviews with key informants from the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA), the DGT of Taxation, the Indonesian Supreme Audit Institution, the State Development Audit Agency, and the Auditor of Inspectorate General of Ministry of Finance. This study shows that the implementation of SIDJP engendered adaptation of ITJEN’s scope and practice, structure, auditor skill requirements, audit tools, audit sizes, and relationship with information technology departments, whereas the audit source and its relationship with the external auditor remained the same. Keywords—Internal audit, system information, institutional theory, institutional logic, Business Process Automation, Indonesian Public Sector.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信