{"title":"发生室性心律失常是否会降低胃扩张扭转(GDV)犬的存活率?","authors":"M. Thomson","doi":"10.18849/ve.v6i4.476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PICO question \nDoes occurrence of ventricular arrhythmia reduce the survival rate in dogs with gastric dilatation and volvulus (GDV)? \n \nClinical bottom line \nCategory of research question \nPrognosis \nThe number and type of study designs reviewed \nThe number and type of study designs that were critically appraised were three retrospective observational case-control studies (Brourman et al., 1996; Green et al., 2012; and Mackenzie et al., 2010) and one prospective, observational study (Aona et al., 2017) \nStrength of evidence \nCritical evaluation and appraisal of the papers that met the inclusion criteria provided only weak evidence to support the clinical question. This is due to the lack of recent (within the last 5 years) and specific (do the presence of cardiac arrythmias affect mortality of dogs with GDV) studies conducted on the subject. Additionally, more in-depth statistical analysis (e.g. P values and confidence intervals (CI)) may also help to determine the strength of association between the presence of ventricular arrythmia and survival rates. \nHowever, there is room for further research to continue investigating the proposed hypothesis. Several of the evaluated studies were carried out more than 10 years before this Knowledge Summary was written, meaning that the knowledge and technology at the time may not be relevant to clinical practice today \nOutcomes reported \nGreen et al. (2012) concluded that ‘cardiac arrhythmia was not a prognostic indicator’ for GDV. \nOf the two papers (Mackenzie et al., 2010; and Brourman et al., 1996) that found a significant association between the development of cardiac arrhythmias (specifically, those of ventricular origin) and an increase in the mortality rates of dogs with GDV, one (Brourman et al., 1996) noted that a greater number of dogs that died prior to discharge were diagnosed with preoperative ventricular tachycardia, while the other (Mackenzie et al., 2010) found that the greatest mortality rate was among those dogs that developed postoperative ventricular tachycardia. \nThe final study, Aona et al. (2017), was the only paper to categorise and grade the ventricular arrhythmias using previously published scales. It was discovered that increased levels of cTn1 (cardiac troponin 1) made a dog more likely to develop a higher grade of arrhythmia, however, no association was found between the type or grade of arrhythmia and patient mortality \nConclusion \nTaking into account the strength of evidence and the outcomes presented by the appraised studies the following conclusion has been drawn; although there is some evidence to suggest that ventricular tachycardia may be associated with an increase in mortality rates in patients with GDV, further research is required in order to make any further conclusions that may definitively answer the clinical question \n \nHow to apply this evidence in practice \nThe application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources. \nKnowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care. \n \n","PeriodicalId":257905,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Evidence","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does occurrence of ventricular arrhythmia reduce the survival rate in dogs with gastric dilatation volvulus (GDV)?\",\"authors\":\"M. Thomson\",\"doi\":\"10.18849/ve.v6i4.476\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PICO question \\nDoes occurrence of ventricular arrhythmia reduce the survival rate in dogs with gastric dilatation and volvulus (GDV)? \\n \\nClinical bottom line \\nCategory of research question \\nPrognosis \\nThe number and type of study designs reviewed \\nThe number and type of study designs that were critically appraised were three retrospective observational case-control studies (Brourman et al., 1996; Green et al., 2012; and Mackenzie et al., 2010) and one prospective, observational study (Aona et al., 2017) \\nStrength of evidence \\nCritical evaluation and appraisal of the papers that met the inclusion criteria provided only weak evidence to support the clinical question. This is due to the lack of recent (within the last 5 years) and specific (do the presence of cardiac arrythmias affect mortality of dogs with GDV) studies conducted on the subject. Additionally, more in-depth statistical analysis (e.g. P values and confidence intervals (CI)) may also help to determine the strength of association between the presence of ventricular arrythmia and survival rates. \\nHowever, there is room for further research to continue investigating the proposed hypothesis. Several of the evaluated studies were carried out more than 10 years before this Knowledge Summary was written, meaning that the knowledge and technology at the time may not be relevant to clinical practice today \\nOutcomes reported \\nGreen et al. (2012) concluded that ‘cardiac arrhythmia was not a prognostic indicator’ for GDV. \\nOf the two papers (Mackenzie et al., 2010; and Brourman et al., 1996) that found a significant association between the development of cardiac arrhythmias (specifically, those of ventricular origin) and an increase in the mortality rates of dogs with GDV, one (Brourman et al., 1996) noted that a greater number of dogs that died prior to discharge were diagnosed with preoperative ventricular tachycardia, while the other (Mackenzie et al., 2010) found that the greatest mortality rate was among those dogs that developed postoperative ventricular tachycardia. \\nThe final study, Aona et al. (2017), was the only paper to categorise and grade the ventricular arrhythmias using previously published scales. It was discovered that increased levels of cTn1 (cardiac troponin 1) made a dog more likely to develop a higher grade of arrhythmia, however, no association was found between the type or grade of arrhythmia and patient mortality \\nConclusion \\nTaking into account the strength of evidence and the outcomes presented by the appraised studies the following conclusion has been drawn; although there is some evidence to suggest that ventricular tachycardia may be associated with an increase in mortality rates in patients with GDV, further research is required in order to make any further conclusions that may definitively answer the clinical question \\n \\nHow to apply this evidence in practice \\nThe application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources. \\nKnowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care. \\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":257905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary Evidence\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary Evidence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v6i4.476\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v6i4.476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
室性心律失常的发生是否会降低胃扩张和胃扭转(GDV)犬的生存率?临床基线研究问题类别预后所审查的研究设计的数量和类型被严格评价的研究设计的数量和类型为三个回顾性观察性病例对照研究(Brourman et al., 1996;Green et al., 2012;and Mackenzie et al., 2010)和一项前瞻性观察性研究(Aona et al., 2017)证据的强度对符合纳入标准的论文的批判性评估和评价仅提供了微弱的证据来支持临床问题。这是由于缺乏最近(近5年)和具体(是否存在心律失常影响GDV狗的死亡率)的研究进行的主题。此外,更深入的统计分析(如P值和置信区间(CI))也可能有助于确定室性心律失常存在与生存率之间的关联强度。然而,仍有进一步研究的空间,以继续调查提出的假设。一些被评估的研究是在本知识摘要撰写前10多年进行的,这意味着当时的知识和技术可能与今天的临床实践不相关。Green等人(2012)得出结论,“心律失常不是GDV的预后指标”。在这两篇论文中(Mackenzie et al., 2010;和Brourman et al., 1996)发现心律失常(特别是室性心律失常)的发生与GDV狗的死亡率增加之间存在显著关联,其中一项(Brourman et al., 1996)指出,出院前死亡的狗中,有更多的狗被诊断为术前室性心动过速,而另一项(Mackenzie et al.,2010)发现死亡率最高的是那些发生术后室性心动过速的狗。最后一项研究,Aona等人(2017),是唯一一篇使用先前发表的量表对室性心律失常进行分类和分级的论文。研究发现,cTn1(心肌肌钙蛋白1)水平的升高使狗更有可能发生更高级别的心律失常,然而,心律失常的类型或级别与患者死亡率之间没有发现关联结论考虑到证据的强度和评估研究提供的结果,得出以下结论:虽然有一些证据表明室性心动过速可能与GDV患者死亡率的增加有关,但需要进一步的研究才能得出任何进一步的结论,从而明确回答临床问题,如何将这些证据应用于实践。证据应用于实践应考虑多种因素,不限于:个人的临床专业知识,病人的情况和业主的价值观,你工作的国家,地点或诊所,你面前的个案,治疗和资源的可用性。知识摘要是帮助加强或告知决策的资源。他们不会凌驾于从业者的责任或判断之上,去做对他们照顾的动物最好的事情。
Does occurrence of ventricular arrhythmia reduce the survival rate in dogs with gastric dilatation volvulus (GDV)?
PICO question
Does occurrence of ventricular arrhythmia reduce the survival rate in dogs with gastric dilatation and volvulus (GDV)?
Clinical bottom line
Category of research question
Prognosis
The number and type of study designs reviewed
The number and type of study designs that were critically appraised were three retrospective observational case-control studies (Brourman et al., 1996; Green et al., 2012; and Mackenzie et al., 2010) and one prospective, observational study (Aona et al., 2017)
Strength of evidence
Critical evaluation and appraisal of the papers that met the inclusion criteria provided only weak evidence to support the clinical question. This is due to the lack of recent (within the last 5 years) and specific (do the presence of cardiac arrythmias affect mortality of dogs with GDV) studies conducted on the subject. Additionally, more in-depth statistical analysis (e.g. P values and confidence intervals (CI)) may also help to determine the strength of association between the presence of ventricular arrythmia and survival rates.
However, there is room for further research to continue investigating the proposed hypothesis. Several of the evaluated studies were carried out more than 10 years before this Knowledge Summary was written, meaning that the knowledge and technology at the time may not be relevant to clinical practice today
Outcomes reported
Green et al. (2012) concluded that ‘cardiac arrhythmia was not a prognostic indicator’ for GDV.
Of the two papers (Mackenzie et al., 2010; and Brourman et al., 1996) that found a significant association between the development of cardiac arrhythmias (specifically, those of ventricular origin) and an increase in the mortality rates of dogs with GDV, one (Brourman et al., 1996) noted that a greater number of dogs that died prior to discharge were diagnosed with preoperative ventricular tachycardia, while the other (Mackenzie et al., 2010) found that the greatest mortality rate was among those dogs that developed postoperative ventricular tachycardia.
The final study, Aona et al. (2017), was the only paper to categorise and grade the ventricular arrhythmias using previously published scales. It was discovered that increased levels of cTn1 (cardiac troponin 1) made a dog more likely to develop a higher grade of arrhythmia, however, no association was found between the type or grade of arrhythmia and patient mortality
Conclusion
Taking into account the strength of evidence and the outcomes presented by the appraised studies the following conclusion has been drawn; although there is some evidence to suggest that ventricular tachycardia may be associated with an increase in mortality rates in patients with GDV, further research is required in order to make any further conclusions that may definitively answer the clinical question
How to apply this evidence in practice
The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources.
Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.