厄瓜多尔儿科重症监护病房有效肠内和肠外营养的感知障碍:一项多中心调查研究。

S. Campos-Miño, María Carolina Velasco, Paúl Moscoso, Xavier Páez, M. Alvear, C. Alvarado, Bayron Guillen
{"title":"厄瓜多尔儿科重症监护病房有效肠内和肠外营养的感知障碍:一项多中心调查研究。","authors":"S. Campos-Miño, María Carolina Velasco, Paúl Moscoso, Xavier Páez, M. Alvear, C. Alvarado, Bayron Guillen","doi":"10.47464/metrociencia/vol29/4/2021/27-35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: To identify the main barriers perceived by pediatric intensive care healthcare professionals in delivering enteral and parenteral nutrition to critically ill children in Ecuador. Methods: An online cross-sectional survey was sent electronically from May 2020 to July 2020 to PICU intensivists, pediatricians, nurses, and dieticians across Ecuador. The questionnaire consisted of 27 questions on the barriers to enteral nutrition (EN) and 10 questions on the barriers to parenteral nutrition (PN). Respondents were asked to rate each barrier based on a 7-point Likert scale that ranged from 0 = “it is not a barrier at all” to 6 = “it has a great influence as a barrier”. Each barrier was classified into three categories according to the Likert scale score: no barrier (0), moderate barrier (1-3), and important barrier (4-6). Results: A total of 119 responses from 16 hospitals were obtained. 34% of respondents were pediatricians, 21% pediatric intensivists, 39% nurses, and 6% dieticians. The top 5 perceived barriers for EN were: 1) Feeding being held too far in advance of procedures or operating room visits, 2) Not enough time dedicated to education and training, 3) No or not enough dietician coverage during evenings, weekends, and holidays 4) Dietician not routinely present on weekday patient rounds, 5) Lack of familiarity with current guidelines for nutrition. For PN the top three perceived barriers were: 1) Waiting for physician to place a central venous catheter and then request and review X-ray to confirm its correct placement, 2) There is no PN protocol in place or it is not applied, 3) There is no catheter or catheter lumen available for PN purposes only. Conclusions: Our study shows that many perceived barriers to EN in Ecuadorian PICUs are like those found internationally. Barriers to the implementation of PN were also evaluated, finding organizational problems to be one of the main limitations. Most of the identified barriers can be overcome through practical strategies such as the development of specific protocols for enteral and parenteral nutrition and the conformation of multidisciplinary teams. It is essential to implement continuous training programs in nutrition for all health personnel in charge of critically ill pediatric patients.","PeriodicalId":166447,"journal":{"name":"Metro Ciencia","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived barriers to effective enteral and parenteral nutrition in pediatric intensive care units in Ecuador: a multicenter survey study.\",\"authors\":\"S. Campos-Miño, María Carolina Velasco, Paúl Moscoso, Xavier Páez, M. Alvear, C. Alvarado, Bayron Guillen\",\"doi\":\"10.47464/metrociencia/vol29/4/2021/27-35\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aims: To identify the main barriers perceived by pediatric intensive care healthcare professionals in delivering enteral and parenteral nutrition to critically ill children in Ecuador. Methods: An online cross-sectional survey was sent electronically from May 2020 to July 2020 to PICU intensivists, pediatricians, nurses, and dieticians across Ecuador. The questionnaire consisted of 27 questions on the barriers to enteral nutrition (EN) and 10 questions on the barriers to parenteral nutrition (PN). Respondents were asked to rate each barrier based on a 7-point Likert scale that ranged from 0 = “it is not a barrier at all” to 6 = “it has a great influence as a barrier”. Each barrier was classified into three categories according to the Likert scale score: no barrier (0), moderate barrier (1-3), and important barrier (4-6). Results: A total of 119 responses from 16 hospitals were obtained. 34% of respondents were pediatricians, 21% pediatric intensivists, 39% nurses, and 6% dieticians. The top 5 perceived barriers for EN were: 1) Feeding being held too far in advance of procedures or operating room visits, 2) Not enough time dedicated to education and training, 3) No or not enough dietician coverage during evenings, weekends, and holidays 4) Dietician not routinely present on weekday patient rounds, 5) Lack of familiarity with current guidelines for nutrition. For PN the top three perceived barriers were: 1) Waiting for physician to place a central venous catheter and then request and review X-ray to confirm its correct placement, 2) There is no PN protocol in place or it is not applied, 3) There is no catheter or catheter lumen available for PN purposes only. Conclusions: Our study shows that many perceived barriers to EN in Ecuadorian PICUs are like those found internationally. Barriers to the implementation of PN were also evaluated, finding organizational problems to be one of the main limitations. Most of the identified barriers can be overcome through practical strategies such as the development of specific protocols for enteral and parenteral nutrition and the conformation of multidisciplinary teams. It is essential to implement continuous training programs in nutrition for all health personnel in charge of critically ill pediatric patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Metro Ciencia\",\"volume\":\"104 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Metro Ciencia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47464/metrociencia/vol29/4/2021/27-35\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metro Ciencia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47464/metrociencia/vol29/4/2021/27-35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定儿科重症监护保健专业人员在向厄瓜多尔危重儿童提供肠内和肠外营养时感受到的主要障碍。方法:2020年5月至2020年7月,通过电子方式向厄瓜多尔PICU重症监护医师、儿科医生、护士和营养师发送在线横断面调查。问卷包括27个肠内营养障碍(EN)问题和10个肠外营养障碍(PN)问题。受访者被要求根据7分的李克特量表对每个障碍进行评分,从0 =“根本不是障碍”到6 =“作为障碍有很大影响”。根据Likert量表得分将每个障碍分为三类:无障碍(0)、中度障碍(1-3)和重要障碍(4-6)。结果:共获得来自16家医院的119份反馈。34%的受访者是儿科医生,21%是儿科重症医师,39%是护士,6%是营养师。最常见的5个障碍是:1)在手术或手术室就诊前太早进行喂养;2)没有足够的时间用于教育和培训;3)没有或没有足够的营养师在晚上、周末和假期提供服务;4)营养师没有常规出现在工作日的病人查房中;5)缺乏对当前营养指南的熟悉。对于PN而言,最常见的三个障碍是:1)等待医生放置中心静脉导管,然后要求并检查x光片以确认其正确放置,2)没有适当的PN协议或未应用,3)没有仅用于PN目的的导管或导管腔。结论:我们的研究表明,厄瓜多尔picu的许多认知障碍与国际上发现的障碍相似。还评估了实施PN的障碍,发现组织问题是主要限制之一。大多数已确定的障碍可以通过诸如制定肠内和肠外营养的具体方案以及组建多学科小组等实际战略加以克服。对所有负责儿科危重病人的卫生人员实施持续的营养培训计划至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceived barriers to effective enteral and parenteral nutrition in pediatric intensive care units in Ecuador: a multicenter survey study.
Aims: To identify the main barriers perceived by pediatric intensive care healthcare professionals in delivering enteral and parenteral nutrition to critically ill children in Ecuador. Methods: An online cross-sectional survey was sent electronically from May 2020 to July 2020 to PICU intensivists, pediatricians, nurses, and dieticians across Ecuador. The questionnaire consisted of 27 questions on the barriers to enteral nutrition (EN) and 10 questions on the barriers to parenteral nutrition (PN). Respondents were asked to rate each barrier based on a 7-point Likert scale that ranged from 0 = “it is not a barrier at all” to 6 = “it has a great influence as a barrier”. Each barrier was classified into three categories according to the Likert scale score: no barrier (0), moderate barrier (1-3), and important barrier (4-6). Results: A total of 119 responses from 16 hospitals were obtained. 34% of respondents were pediatricians, 21% pediatric intensivists, 39% nurses, and 6% dieticians. The top 5 perceived barriers for EN were: 1) Feeding being held too far in advance of procedures or operating room visits, 2) Not enough time dedicated to education and training, 3) No or not enough dietician coverage during evenings, weekends, and holidays 4) Dietician not routinely present on weekday patient rounds, 5) Lack of familiarity with current guidelines for nutrition. For PN the top three perceived barriers were: 1) Waiting for physician to place a central venous catheter and then request and review X-ray to confirm its correct placement, 2) There is no PN protocol in place or it is not applied, 3) There is no catheter or catheter lumen available for PN purposes only. Conclusions: Our study shows that many perceived barriers to EN in Ecuadorian PICUs are like those found internationally. Barriers to the implementation of PN were also evaluated, finding organizational problems to be one of the main limitations. Most of the identified barriers can be overcome through practical strategies such as the development of specific protocols for enteral and parenteral nutrition and the conformation of multidisciplinary teams. It is essential to implement continuous training programs in nutrition for all health personnel in charge of critically ill pediatric patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信