稳定条款的死胡同?特许指令对投资者保护机制的影响

C. Stănescu
{"title":"稳定条款的死胡同?特许指令对投资者保护机制的影响","authors":"C. Stănescu","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3291270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2014/23/EU Directive on concessions introduces a new definition for concession contracts and a new set of rules concerning contract design and contract modification. The paper seeks to determine the effects of the Directive on concessions concerning oil and gas or energy production, mainly the clauses providing for fiscal and political investor protection mechanisms. By analyzing the black letter provisions of the Directive, the existent CJEU case law and relevant arbitral awards, it concludes that the new EU regime of concessions is incompatible with stabilization clauses and other mechanisms of investor protection that, on the one hand, limit the state’s regulatory powers and, on the other hand, guarantee investor’s profit arising from a concession, on the state’s expense. However, such change of regime is likely to stir a new wave of arbitration cases with unforeseeable results regarding the application of EU law and to drive away foreign investment altogether.","PeriodicalId":378416,"journal":{"name":"International Economic Law eJournal","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dead End for Stabilization Clauses? The Effects of the Concessions Directive on Investor Protection Mechanisms\",\"authors\":\"C. Stănescu\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.3291270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The 2014/23/EU Directive on concessions introduces a new definition for concession contracts and a new set of rules concerning contract design and contract modification. The paper seeks to determine the effects of the Directive on concessions concerning oil and gas or energy production, mainly the clauses providing for fiscal and political investor protection mechanisms. By analyzing the black letter provisions of the Directive, the existent CJEU case law and relevant arbitral awards, it concludes that the new EU regime of concessions is incompatible with stabilization clauses and other mechanisms of investor protection that, on the one hand, limit the state’s regulatory powers and, on the other hand, guarantee investor’s profit arising from a concession, on the state’s expense. However, such change of regime is likely to stir a new wave of arbitration cases with unforeseeable results regarding the application of EU law and to drive away foreign investment altogether.\",\"PeriodicalId\":378416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Economic Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"106 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Economic Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3291270\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Economic Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3291270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于特许权的2014/23/EU指令引入了特许权合同的新定义以及一套关于合同设计和合同修改的新规则。本文件试图确定该指令对石油和天然气或能源生产特许权的影响,主要是规定财政和政治投资者保护机制的条款。通过分析该指令的黑体字条款、现有的欧洲法院判例法和相关仲裁裁决,本文得出结论,新的欧盟特许权制度与稳定条款和其他投资者保护机制不相容,这些机制一方面限制了国家的监管权力,另一方面以国家为代价保证投资者从特许权中获得利润。然而,这种制度的改变很可能引发新一轮仲裁案件,对欧盟法律的适用产生不可预见的后果,并彻底赶走外国投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dead End for Stabilization Clauses? The Effects of the Concessions Directive on Investor Protection Mechanisms
The 2014/23/EU Directive on concessions introduces a new definition for concession contracts and a new set of rules concerning contract design and contract modification. The paper seeks to determine the effects of the Directive on concessions concerning oil and gas or energy production, mainly the clauses providing for fiscal and political investor protection mechanisms. By analyzing the black letter provisions of the Directive, the existent CJEU case law and relevant arbitral awards, it concludes that the new EU regime of concessions is incompatible with stabilization clauses and other mechanisms of investor protection that, on the one hand, limit the state’s regulatory powers and, on the other hand, guarantee investor’s profit arising from a concession, on the state’s expense. However, such change of regime is likely to stir a new wave of arbitration cases with unforeseeable results regarding the application of EU law and to drive away foreign investment altogether.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信