高人一等:团队表现与团队凝聚力、团队熟悉度、团队效率和士兵杀伤力有关

Foster Dittmer, Hays Greer, Hannah Homsy, Connor Long, Kathryn Seyer, J. Eaton
{"title":"高人一等:团队表现与团队凝聚力、团队熟悉度、团队效率和士兵杀伤力有关","authors":"Foster Dittmer, Hays Greer, Hannah Homsy, Connor Long, Kathryn Seyer, J. Eaton","doi":"10.1109/SIEDS49339.2020.9106660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of this study is to gather and analyze data through the use of psychometric instruments regarding several theoretical constructs, including Team Cohesion, Team Familiarity, and Team Effectiveness in order to determine their differential impact on Team Performance outcomes. Background: The annual Sandhurst competition, held at the United States Military Academy, provides cadets the opportunity to function as a small unit. Data collected before, during, and after the competition is used to study the performance of each team in order to gain insights on how Team Cohesion, textit{TeamFamiliarity}, and Team Effectiveness influence their final rankings. In addition, this study develops and tests a Soldier Lethality proxy measure using numerical data collected before and during the competition, which is also used to predict Team Performance. Methods: Psychometric instruments and linear regression models are used to determine the significance of the theoretical constructs and the Soldier Lethality measure on Team Performance outcomes. Results: A total of 194 cadets out of the 456 cadets that participated in the Sandhurst Competition completed the survey. Our findings show that the theoretical constructs were not statistically significant when evaluating Team Performance. However, the Soldier Lethality measure yields a significant result (p-value =0.002; β=0.5; R2=0.22). Conclusions: In this study, raw physical data (denoted here as secondary data) is more effective in predicting Team Performance outcomes in a combatlike setting as opposed to using psychometric instruments due to non-response error (failure to respond to one, or all of the survey questions) and response bias (untruthfully or misleadingly responses). Application: This study shows how objective, detailed data on teamwork may be used to provide insights into questions of the performance of teams.","PeriodicalId":331495,"journal":{"name":"2020 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Cut Above the Rest: Team Performance as a Function of Team Cohesion, Team Familiarity, Team Effectiveness, and Soldier Lethality\",\"authors\":\"Foster Dittmer, Hays Greer, Hannah Homsy, Connor Long, Kathryn Seyer, J. Eaton\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SIEDS49339.2020.9106660\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The objective of this study is to gather and analyze data through the use of psychometric instruments regarding several theoretical constructs, including Team Cohesion, Team Familiarity, and Team Effectiveness in order to determine their differential impact on Team Performance outcomes. Background: The annual Sandhurst competition, held at the United States Military Academy, provides cadets the opportunity to function as a small unit. Data collected before, during, and after the competition is used to study the performance of each team in order to gain insights on how Team Cohesion, textit{TeamFamiliarity}, and Team Effectiveness influence their final rankings. In addition, this study develops and tests a Soldier Lethality proxy measure using numerical data collected before and during the competition, which is also used to predict Team Performance. Methods: Psychometric instruments and linear regression models are used to determine the significance of the theoretical constructs and the Soldier Lethality measure on Team Performance outcomes. Results: A total of 194 cadets out of the 456 cadets that participated in the Sandhurst Competition completed the survey. Our findings show that the theoretical constructs were not statistically significant when evaluating Team Performance. However, the Soldier Lethality measure yields a significant result (p-value =0.002; β=0.5; R2=0.22). Conclusions: In this study, raw physical data (denoted here as secondary data) is more effective in predicting Team Performance outcomes in a combatlike setting as opposed to using psychometric instruments due to non-response error (failure to respond to one, or all of the survey questions) and response bias (untruthfully or misleadingly responses). Application: This study shows how objective, detailed data on teamwork may be used to provide insights into questions of the performance of teams.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS49339.2020.9106660\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS49339.2020.9106660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是通过使用心理测量工具收集和分析关于几个理论结构的数据,包括团队凝聚力、团队熟悉度和团队有效性,以确定它们对团队绩效结果的差异影响。背景:一年一度的桑德赫斯特竞赛在美国军事学院举行,为学员提供了作为一个小单位发挥作用的机会。在比赛之前、期间和之后收集的数据被用来研究每个团队的表现,以了解团队凝聚力、文本{teamfamiliar}和团队有效性如何影响他们的最终排名。此外,本研究开发并测试了一种士兵杀伤力代理测量方法,该方法使用在比赛前和比赛期间收集的数值数据,也用于预测团队绩效。方法:采用心理测量工具和线性回归模型,确定理论构念和士兵杀伤力测量对团队绩效结果的显著性。结果:参加桑德赫斯特竞赛的456名学员中,共有194名学员完成了调查。我们的研究结果表明,理论构念在评估团队绩效时不具有统计学意义。然而,士兵死亡率测量产生了显著的结果(p值=0.002;β= 0.5;R2 = 0.22)。结论:在本研究中,原始物理数据(此处表示为次要数据)在预测战斗环境中的团队绩效结果方面更有效,而不是由于无反应错误(未能回答一个或所有调查问题)和反应偏差(不真实或误导性的回答)而使用心理测量工具。应用:本研究展示了如何使用客观、详细的团队合作数据来提供对团队绩效问题的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Cut Above the Rest: Team Performance as a Function of Team Cohesion, Team Familiarity, Team Effectiveness, and Soldier Lethality
Objective: The objective of this study is to gather and analyze data through the use of psychometric instruments regarding several theoretical constructs, including Team Cohesion, Team Familiarity, and Team Effectiveness in order to determine their differential impact on Team Performance outcomes. Background: The annual Sandhurst competition, held at the United States Military Academy, provides cadets the opportunity to function as a small unit. Data collected before, during, and after the competition is used to study the performance of each team in order to gain insights on how Team Cohesion, textit{TeamFamiliarity}, and Team Effectiveness influence their final rankings. In addition, this study develops and tests a Soldier Lethality proxy measure using numerical data collected before and during the competition, which is also used to predict Team Performance. Methods: Psychometric instruments and linear regression models are used to determine the significance of the theoretical constructs and the Soldier Lethality measure on Team Performance outcomes. Results: A total of 194 cadets out of the 456 cadets that participated in the Sandhurst Competition completed the survey. Our findings show that the theoretical constructs were not statistically significant when evaluating Team Performance. However, the Soldier Lethality measure yields a significant result (p-value =0.002; β=0.5; R2=0.22). Conclusions: In this study, raw physical data (denoted here as secondary data) is more effective in predicting Team Performance outcomes in a combatlike setting as opposed to using psychometric instruments due to non-response error (failure to respond to one, or all of the survey questions) and response bias (untruthfully or misleadingly responses). Application: This study shows how objective, detailed data on teamwork may be used to provide insights into questions of the performance of teams.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信