电子货币提供商的决议权

Katharine Kemp, Ross P. Buckley
{"title":"电子货币提供商的决议权","authors":"Katharine Kemp, Ross P. Buckley","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3002927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"E-money has grown dramatically in a number of countries of late, often driven by non-bank providers of e-money, particularly telecommunications companies. Many countries have regulated the issuance of e-money, but in times of trouble there is usually a discrepancy in the treatment of bank and non-bank issuers. When a bank experiences financial distress, legislation normally grants an authority resolution powers to ensure an orderly winding up while limiting systemic disruption and losses to deposit holders. These resolution powers do not usually extend to non-bank e-money providers, notwithstanding the potential disruption the collapse of a large provider could now cause in some countries. This paper proposes three approaches, legislative and non-legislative, to granting resolution powers in respect of e-money providers to limit losses and preserve systemic stability.","PeriodicalId":437878,"journal":{"name":"IRPN: Technology Transfer (Topic)","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resolution Powers Over E-Money Providers\",\"authors\":\"Katharine Kemp, Ross P. Buckley\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.3002927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"E-money has grown dramatically in a number of countries of late, often driven by non-bank providers of e-money, particularly telecommunications companies. Many countries have regulated the issuance of e-money, but in times of trouble there is usually a discrepancy in the treatment of bank and non-bank issuers. When a bank experiences financial distress, legislation normally grants an authority resolution powers to ensure an orderly winding up while limiting systemic disruption and losses to deposit holders. These resolution powers do not usually extend to non-bank e-money providers, notwithstanding the potential disruption the collapse of a large provider could now cause in some countries. This paper proposes three approaches, legislative and non-legislative, to granting resolution powers in respect of e-money providers to limit losses and preserve systemic stability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":437878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IRPN: Technology Transfer (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IRPN: Technology Transfer (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3002927\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRPN: Technology Transfer (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3002927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,电子货币在许多国家迅猛发展,这通常是由非银行电子货币提供商推动的,尤其是电信公司。许多国家都对电子货币的发行进行了监管,但在困难时期,银行和非银行发行人的待遇通常存在差异。当一家银行陷入财务困境时,立法通常会授予当局解决权,以确保有序清盘,同时限制系统性破坏和存款持有人的损失。这些决议权通常不会延伸到非银行电子货币提供商,尽管大型提供商的倒闭现在可能在一些国家造成潜在的破坏。本文提出了立法和非立法三种方法来授予电子货币提供商的决议权,以限制损失并保持系统稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Resolution Powers Over E-Money Providers
E-money has grown dramatically in a number of countries of late, often driven by non-bank providers of e-money, particularly telecommunications companies. Many countries have regulated the issuance of e-money, but in times of trouble there is usually a discrepancy in the treatment of bank and non-bank issuers. When a bank experiences financial distress, legislation normally grants an authority resolution powers to ensure an orderly winding up while limiting systemic disruption and losses to deposit holders. These resolution powers do not usually extend to non-bank e-money providers, notwithstanding the potential disruption the collapse of a large provider could now cause in some countries. This paper proposes three approaches, legislative and non-legislative, to granting resolution powers in respect of e-money providers to limit losses and preserve systemic stability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信