强制投标规则下公司控制权的低效出售

Hidefusa Iida
{"title":"强制投标规则下公司控制权的低效出售","authors":"Hidefusa Iida","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2581374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Separating the value-increasing takeovers from the value-decreasing takeovers is the ideal goal in designing the legal rule on takeovers. The previous studies showed that the Mandatory Bid Rule stops all of the inefficient sales of corporate control. However, this paper, by using the negative private benefits model, refutes this proposition which assumes that private benefits of control are positive. To justify the assumption of negative private benefits, this study examines two events that the standard model cannot explain, but the negative private benefits model does. The Mandatory Bid Rule is not a perfect screen to stop inefficient takeovers.","PeriodicalId":309706,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Governance Law & Arrangements by Subject Matter (Topic)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inefficient Sales of Corporate Control Under Mandatory Bid Rule\",\"authors\":\"Hidefusa Iida\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2581374\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Separating the value-increasing takeovers from the value-decreasing takeovers is the ideal goal in designing the legal rule on takeovers. The previous studies showed that the Mandatory Bid Rule stops all of the inefficient sales of corporate control. However, this paper, by using the negative private benefits model, refutes this proposition which assumes that private benefits of control are positive. To justify the assumption of negative private benefits, this study examines two events that the standard model cannot explain, but the negative private benefits model does. The Mandatory Bid Rule is not a perfect screen to stop inefficient takeovers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":309706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CGN: Governance Law & Arrangements by Subject Matter (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CGN: Governance Law & Arrangements by Subject Matter (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2581374\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Governance Law & Arrangements by Subject Matter (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2581374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

将价值增值收购与价值递减收购分离开来是并购法律规则设计的理想目标。以往的研究表明,强制收购规则阻止了所有公司控制权的低效出售。然而,本文运用负私有利益模型反驳了这一假设控制私有利益为正的命题。为了证明负私人利益的假设是正确的,本研究考察了标准模型无法解释而负私人利益模型可以解释的两个事件。强制收购规则并不是阻止低效收购的完美屏障。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inefficient Sales of Corporate Control Under Mandatory Bid Rule
Separating the value-increasing takeovers from the value-decreasing takeovers is the ideal goal in designing the legal rule on takeovers. The previous studies showed that the Mandatory Bid Rule stops all of the inefficient sales of corporate control. However, this paper, by using the negative private benefits model, refutes this proposition which assumes that private benefits of control are positive. To justify the assumption of negative private benefits, this study examines two events that the standard model cannot explain, but the negative private benefits model does. The Mandatory Bid Rule is not a perfect screen to stop inefficient takeovers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信