禁止对CMU-C健康保险受益人收取额外费用:对私人执业的医生和牙医有什么影响?

B. Dormont, Cécile Gayet
{"title":"禁止对CMU-C健康保险受益人收取额外费用:对私人执业的医生和牙医有什么影响?","authors":"B. Dormont, Cécile Gayet","doi":"10.24187/ECOSTAT.2021.524D.2046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[eng] Whilst it is forbidden to charge patients with CMU-C health cover fees in excess of the reimbursable regulated fee (or extra fees), so as to make their access to care easier, field experiment studies report discrimination against the latter by physicians. This issue is approached here from the angle of healthcare supply, using four waves of longitudinal administrative data on physicians in private practice between 2005 and 2014. We examine whether this ban on excess fees for CMU-C beneficiaries, i.e. charging them fees in excess of the standard social security-negotiated fees agreed under the public health insurance scheme, generates a real financial constraint for Sector 2 physicians (those who charge extra-fees) and dentists in private practice. Estimates show a significant drop in the average extra-fees per procedure when physicians accept more CMU-C patients in their practice. Even if costs are transferred (cost-shifting), with other patients being charged higher extra-fees, this is not enough to offset the financial impact. However, this restriction does not have a negative impact on total fees for Sector 2 specialists, general practitioners and dentists, as they increase their volume of activity at the same time.","PeriodicalId":431625,"journal":{"name":"Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics","volume":"204 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Ban on Extra-Fees for Beneficiaries of the CMU-C Health Cover: What Consequences for Physicians and Dentists in Private Practice?\",\"authors\":\"B. Dormont, Cécile Gayet\",\"doi\":\"10.24187/ECOSTAT.2021.524D.2046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"[eng] Whilst it is forbidden to charge patients with CMU-C health cover fees in excess of the reimbursable regulated fee (or extra fees), so as to make their access to care easier, field experiment studies report discrimination against the latter by physicians. This issue is approached here from the angle of healthcare supply, using four waves of longitudinal administrative data on physicians in private practice between 2005 and 2014. We examine whether this ban on excess fees for CMU-C beneficiaries, i.e. charging them fees in excess of the standard social security-negotiated fees agreed under the public health insurance scheme, generates a real financial constraint for Sector 2 physicians (those who charge extra-fees) and dentists in private practice. Estimates show a significant drop in the average extra-fees per procedure when physicians accept more CMU-C patients in their practice. Even if costs are transferred (cost-shifting), with other patients being charged higher extra-fees, this is not enough to offset the financial impact. However, this restriction does not have a negative impact on total fees for Sector 2 specialists, general practitioners and dentists, as they increase their volume of activity at the same time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":431625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics\",\"volume\":\"204 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24187/ECOSTAT.2021.524D.2046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24187/ECOSTAT.2021.524D.2046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然禁止向患有慢性阻塞性肺病的患者收取超过可报销的规定费用(或额外费用)的医疗保险费用,以使他们更容易获得护理,但实地实验研究报告了医生对后者的歧视。本文从医疗保健供应的角度出发,利用2005年至2014年间私人执业医生的四波纵向管理数据来探讨这个问题。我们研究了对CMU-C受益人收取超额费用的禁令,即向他们收取超过公共健康保险计划下商定的标准社会保障协商费用的费用,是否会对第二部门的医生(收取额外费用的人)和私人执业的牙医产生真正的财务限制。估计表明,当医生在实践中接受更多的CMU-C患者时,每次手术的平均额外费用显着下降。即使成本转移(成本转移),其他患者被收取更高的额外费用,这也不足以抵消经济影响。然而,这一限制并没有对第二部门专家、全科医生和牙医的总费用产生负面影响,因为他们同时增加了他们的活动量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Ban on Extra-Fees for Beneficiaries of the CMU-C Health Cover: What Consequences for Physicians and Dentists in Private Practice?
[eng] Whilst it is forbidden to charge patients with CMU-C health cover fees in excess of the reimbursable regulated fee (or extra fees), so as to make their access to care easier, field experiment studies report discrimination against the latter by physicians. This issue is approached here from the angle of healthcare supply, using four waves of longitudinal administrative data on physicians in private practice between 2005 and 2014. We examine whether this ban on excess fees for CMU-C beneficiaries, i.e. charging them fees in excess of the standard social security-negotiated fees agreed under the public health insurance scheme, generates a real financial constraint for Sector 2 physicians (those who charge extra-fees) and dentists in private practice. Estimates show a significant drop in the average extra-fees per procedure when physicians accept more CMU-C patients in their practice. Even if costs are transferred (cost-shifting), with other patients being charged higher extra-fees, this is not enough to offset the financial impact. However, this restriction does not have a negative impact on total fees for Sector 2 specialists, general practitioners and dentists, as they increase their volume of activity at the same time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信