基于决策树分类器和以拟合为参数的创新反向传播算法的糖尿病异常检测分析

Aluru Pradeepik, R. Sabitha
{"title":"基于决策树分类器和以拟合为参数的创新反向传播算法的糖尿病异常检测分析","authors":"Aluru Pradeepik, R. Sabitha","doi":"10.1109/ICBATS54253.2022.9759012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The work aims to evaluate the accuracy and precision in the analysis of Anomaly detection of diabetes using Decision tree and Backpropagation classification algorithm. Materials and Methods: Back Propagation Classification is applied on a Pima Indian diabetes dataset that consist of 769 records. A machine learning techniques for earlier prediction of diabetes disease which compares Decision tree and Back Propagation Classification algorithms has been proposed and developed. The sample size was measured as 27 per group using Glower. Sample size was calculated using clincalc analysis, with alpha and beta values 0.07 and 0.5, 95% confidence, pretest power 80% and enrolment ratio 1. The accuracy and precision of the classifiers was evaluated and recorded. Results: The accuracy was maximum in predicting diabetes usingBack propagation (77.29%) with minimum mean error when compared with Decision tree classifier (70.09%). There is a significant difference of 0.05 between the classifiers. Conclusion: The study proves that Back Propagation exhibits better accuracy than Decision tree classifier in predicting diabetes.","PeriodicalId":289224,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Conference on Business Analytics for Technology and Security (ICBATS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Anomaly Detection of Diabetes Using Decision Tree Classifier and an Innovative Back Propagation Algorithm using Fit as a Parameter\",\"authors\":\"Aluru Pradeepik, R. Sabitha\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICBATS54253.2022.9759012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: The work aims to evaluate the accuracy and precision in the analysis of Anomaly detection of diabetes using Decision tree and Backpropagation classification algorithm. Materials and Methods: Back Propagation Classification is applied on a Pima Indian diabetes dataset that consist of 769 records. A machine learning techniques for earlier prediction of diabetes disease which compares Decision tree and Back Propagation Classification algorithms has been proposed and developed. The sample size was measured as 27 per group using Glower. Sample size was calculated using clincalc analysis, with alpha and beta values 0.07 and 0.5, 95% confidence, pretest power 80% and enrolment ratio 1. The accuracy and precision of the classifiers was evaluated and recorded. Results: The accuracy was maximum in predicting diabetes usingBack propagation (77.29%) with minimum mean error when compared with Decision tree classifier (70.09%). There is a significant difference of 0.05 between the classifiers. Conclusion: The study proves that Back Propagation exhibits better accuracy than Decision tree classifier in predicting diabetes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":289224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 International Conference on Business Analytics for Technology and Security (ICBATS)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 International Conference on Business Analytics for Technology and Security (ICBATS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBATS54253.2022.9759012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Conference on Business Analytics for Technology and Security (ICBATS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBATS54253.2022.9759012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:评价决策树和反向传播分类算法在糖尿病异常检测分析中的准确性和精密度。材料和方法:反向传播分类应用于由769条记录组成的皮马印第安糖尿病数据集。提出并发展了一种用于糖尿病疾病早期预测的机器学习技术,该技术比较了决策树和反向传播分类算法。用Glower测量每组27个样本。采用临床分析计算样本量,α和β值分别为0.07和0.5,95%置信度,前测威力为80%,入组率为1。对分类器的准确度和精密度进行了评估和记录。结果:与决策树分类器相比,反向传播法预测糖尿病的准确率最高(77.29%),平均误差最小(70.09%)。分类器之间有显著差异0.05。结论:研究证明,反向传播在预测糖尿病方面比决策树分类器具有更好的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Anomaly Detection of Diabetes Using Decision Tree Classifier and an Innovative Back Propagation Algorithm using Fit as a Parameter
Aim: The work aims to evaluate the accuracy and precision in the analysis of Anomaly detection of diabetes using Decision tree and Backpropagation classification algorithm. Materials and Methods: Back Propagation Classification is applied on a Pima Indian diabetes dataset that consist of 769 records. A machine learning techniques for earlier prediction of diabetes disease which compares Decision tree and Back Propagation Classification algorithms has been proposed and developed. The sample size was measured as 27 per group using Glower. Sample size was calculated using clincalc analysis, with alpha and beta values 0.07 and 0.5, 95% confidence, pretest power 80% and enrolment ratio 1. The accuracy and precision of the classifiers was evaluated and recorded. Results: The accuracy was maximum in predicting diabetes usingBack propagation (77.29%) with minimum mean error when compared with Decision tree classifier (70.09%). There is a significant difference of 0.05 between the classifiers. Conclusion: The study proves that Back Propagation exhibits better accuracy than Decision tree classifier in predicting diabetes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信