投资者-国家仲裁法庭适用最惠国条款,对发展中国家的影响:本书各章摘要汇编

T. Sharmin
{"title":"投资者-国家仲裁法庭适用最惠国条款,对发展中国家的影响:本书各章摘要汇编","authors":"T. Sharmin","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3576303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compiles the draft chapter abstracts of my book entitled, 'Application of Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses by Investor-State Arbitral Tribunals. International Law and the Global South (Perspectives from the Rest of the World). Springer, Singapore, 2020. This book comprehensively examines various issues regarding the scope of Most-Favoured Nation (MFN) Clauses in International Investment Agreements (IIAs), and addresses the reform, interpretation, and enforcement of IIAs with a specific focus on the MFN clause. The book begins with a study of the history and evolution of the MFN. It then presents a substantive analysis focusing on the drafting style and how it affects the scope of the MFN; rules of interpretation and arbitral case law on the scope of the MFN, procedural prerequisites to arbitration and jurisdiction of arbitral tribunals, and the implications of adopting an expansive approach to the MFN clause.<br><br>The book’s argument centres on the need for arbitral tribunals to interpret the MFN in a manner that reflects the expressed intent of the parties. This requires taking into consideration the text of the MFN, its purpose, and the overall context of the IIA, rather than relying on values and assumptions that have nothing to do with the original intent of the parties. In making this argument, the book draws on Articles 31 and 32 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and other interpretative rules. What sets the book apart is its comprehensive coverage of issues concerning the interpretation and application of the MFN in IIAs. At the same time, it addresses issues in connection with an expansive interpretation of MFN clauses, as well as concerns regarding the legitimacy crisis in investor-state arbitration. Accordingly, it contributes to future Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) reform, while also offering a wealth of theoretical and practical insights for future treaty drafters, arbitrators, and policymakers.","PeriodicalId":378416,"journal":{"name":"International Economic Law eJournal","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses by Investor-State Arbitral Tribunals, Implications for the Developing Countries: A Collection of Chapter Abstracts of the Book\",\"authors\":\"T. Sharmin\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3576303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper compiles the draft chapter abstracts of my book entitled, 'Application of Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses by Investor-State Arbitral Tribunals. International Law and the Global South (Perspectives from the Rest of the World). Springer, Singapore, 2020. This book comprehensively examines various issues regarding the scope of Most-Favoured Nation (MFN) Clauses in International Investment Agreements (IIAs), and addresses the reform, interpretation, and enforcement of IIAs with a specific focus on the MFN clause. The book begins with a study of the history and evolution of the MFN. It then presents a substantive analysis focusing on the drafting style and how it affects the scope of the MFN; rules of interpretation and arbitral case law on the scope of the MFN, procedural prerequisites to arbitration and jurisdiction of arbitral tribunals, and the implications of adopting an expansive approach to the MFN clause.<br><br>The book’s argument centres on the need for arbitral tribunals to interpret the MFN in a manner that reflects the expressed intent of the parties. This requires taking into consideration the text of the MFN, its purpose, and the overall context of the IIA, rather than relying on values and assumptions that have nothing to do with the original intent of the parties. In making this argument, the book draws on Articles 31 and 32 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and other interpretative rules. What sets the book apart is its comprehensive coverage of issues concerning the interpretation and application of the MFN in IIAs. At the same time, it addresses issues in connection with an expansive interpretation of MFN clauses, as well as concerns regarding the legitimacy crisis in investor-state arbitration. Accordingly, it contributes to future Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) reform, while also offering a wealth of theoretical and practical insights for future treaty drafters, arbitrators, and policymakers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":378416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Economic Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Economic Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3576303\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Economic Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3576303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文汇编了我的著作《投资者-国家仲裁法庭适用最惠国条款》的章节摘要草稿。国际法和全球南方(从世界其他地区的视角)。Springer,新加坡,2020。本书全面考察了有关国际投资协定(IIAs)中最惠国(MFN)条款范围的各种问题,并以最惠国条款为重点,解决了国际投资协定的改革、解释和执行问题。这本书从研究最惠国的历史和演变开始。然后提出实质性分析,重点是起草风格及其如何影响最惠国待遇的范围;关于最惠国范围的解释规则和仲裁判例法,仲裁的程序先决条件和仲裁法庭的管辖权,以及对最惠国条款采取扩张性办法的影响。这本书的论点集中在仲裁法庭需要以反映各方表达的意图的方式解释最惠国待遇。这就要求考虑最惠国待遇的案文、其目的和《国际投资协定》的总体背景,而不是依赖于与各方最初意图毫无关系的价值观和假设。在提出这一论点时,本书引用了《维也纳条约法公约》第31条和第32条以及其他解释性规则。本书的与众不同之处在于它全面涵盖了有关解释和适用国际投资协定中最惠国待遇的问题。与此同时,它处理了与对最惠国条款的广泛解释有关的问题,以及对投资者-国家仲裁的合法性危机的关切。因此,它有助于未来的投资者-国家争端解决机制(ISDS)改革,同时也为未来的条约起草者、仲裁员和政策制定者提供丰富的理论和实践见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses by Investor-State Arbitral Tribunals, Implications for the Developing Countries: A Collection of Chapter Abstracts of the Book
This paper compiles the draft chapter abstracts of my book entitled, 'Application of Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses by Investor-State Arbitral Tribunals. International Law and the Global South (Perspectives from the Rest of the World). Springer, Singapore, 2020. This book comprehensively examines various issues regarding the scope of Most-Favoured Nation (MFN) Clauses in International Investment Agreements (IIAs), and addresses the reform, interpretation, and enforcement of IIAs with a specific focus on the MFN clause. The book begins with a study of the history and evolution of the MFN. It then presents a substantive analysis focusing on the drafting style and how it affects the scope of the MFN; rules of interpretation and arbitral case law on the scope of the MFN, procedural prerequisites to arbitration and jurisdiction of arbitral tribunals, and the implications of adopting an expansive approach to the MFN clause.

The book’s argument centres on the need for arbitral tribunals to interpret the MFN in a manner that reflects the expressed intent of the parties. This requires taking into consideration the text of the MFN, its purpose, and the overall context of the IIA, rather than relying on values and assumptions that have nothing to do with the original intent of the parties. In making this argument, the book draws on Articles 31 and 32 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and other interpretative rules. What sets the book apart is its comprehensive coverage of issues concerning the interpretation and application of the MFN in IIAs. At the same time, it addresses issues in connection with an expansive interpretation of MFN clauses, as well as concerns regarding the legitimacy crisis in investor-state arbitration. Accordingly, it contributes to future Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) reform, while also offering a wealth of theoretical and practical insights for future treaty drafters, arbitrators, and policymakers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信