{"title":"合伙人对银行的诉讼","authors":"Carlo Mancuso","doi":"10.30687/RG/2281-6100/2018/01/008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author comments on a recent decision of the Court of Verona concerning the powers of the “court of businesses” in a case of purchase by an investor partner, of bonds convertible into shares of the bank. Starting from the case decided by the judgment in question, the discussion highlights some problematic aspects related to the different nature of the ordinary court and the court of businesses.","PeriodicalId":204526,"journal":{"name":"Ricerche giuridiche","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Azione del socio investitore contro la Banca\",\"authors\":\"Carlo Mancuso\",\"doi\":\"10.30687/RG/2281-6100/2018/01/008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The author comments on a recent decision of the Court of Verona concerning the powers of the “court of businesses” in a case of purchase by an investor partner, of bonds convertible into shares of the bank. Starting from the case decided by the judgment in question, the discussion highlights some problematic aspects related to the different nature of the ordinary court and the court of businesses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":204526,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ricerche giuridiche\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ricerche giuridiche\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30687/RG/2281-6100/2018/01/008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ricerche giuridiche","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30687/RG/2281-6100/2018/01/008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The author comments on a recent decision of the Court of Verona concerning the powers of the “court of businesses” in a case of purchase by an investor partner, of bonds convertible into shares of the bank. Starting from the case decided by the judgment in question, the discussion highlights some problematic aspects related to the different nature of the ordinary court and the court of businesses.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
